Well, now that I have time to look at the thread, here's my two cents:
This is by extension of its nature limited to the cosmology, which is 1-C.
Sure.
Keep in mind for concept type 1, it has to be independent of the cosmology, not just exist alongside it. And for the BD1 you need to lack space-time in specific.
That is something I already know.
This doesn't exactly prove independence tho? All it shows is that parallel worlds and dimensions don't exist there. Sure, but that is not even close to the scope The "End" governs (the end governs the entire ultimate ensemble, yet the scans here only talk about universes and dimensions not existing here).
That is not correct.
The text confirms multiple times that absolutely nothing existed there. No matter how much UEG searched for any world, universe, dimension, or anything else, there was truly nothing at all. After that, she attempted to travel somewhere, but that also failed, despite the fact that she is capable of time travel, interdimensional travel, and teleportation to any location. Even so, the text explicitly states that there was nowhere to travel to in the first place because nothing existed at all. Therefore, your argument here is not correct, and the text itself never stated what you are claiming here; that is only your own interpretation.
"....I see. this definitely seemed to be a phenomenon that even the wisdom of mistress could not comprehend.
But, would the mistress die? I don't know where I am, but I just have to move to wherever it is I'm going."
UEG explored the area. The darkness went on forever, really forever. It goes on and on, endlessly, as far as UEG's perception can go.
Then she tried to find another dimension, another parallel world, another universe, but that didn't work either. What she see is nothing but emptiness.
There really is nothing here.
Realizing this, UEG was slowly beginning to feel fear. No matter where she tried to go, there was nothing. As long as there was nothing, there was nowhere to travel to.
UEG would have also destroyed everything—spacetime, the universe, and higher universes (including his true form)—but that was pointless because these things do not exist in the first place, as they have already ended. You cannot destroy things that do not exist.
Very well then! I will destroy everything! Space-time! The universe! Higher universes, including that one as well!”
UEG unleashed all of her power with everything she had, but the power that was supposed to destroy everything vanished into the void. UEG’s power had absolutely no effect on the surroundings.
“It’s useless. There is nothing here. You cannot destroy something that does not exist.”
Summary:
This proves that spacetime does not exist and that there is absolutely nothing, as the text explains. Even spacetime itself and higher universes are not present. She stated everything, and the text still confirms that these things do not exist. Of course, there is nothing because everything has already ended here in the end, and the narrative confirms that he is the one who will remain at the end because he is the End. As I said, his darkness is a void of nothingness representing the end, so yes, in essence he is the end of everything. In the end, nothing remains.
This supports his possession of BDE 1, since spacetime itself does not exist, as shown when it was targeted along with everything else.
Also, where are you even getting the idea that yogiri is a concept? The current justification from the profile is this:
It does not mention End being a concept, nor does it classify it as such. Abstract existence does not automatically mean conceptual existence. Abstractions come in many other forms, such as Laws, Information, etc. Also, you already gave him this:
Aspect 2 is Concept. You're basically saying "he's a concept that lacks a concept", which is nonsense... (I mean I can get the logic behind a concept of nonexistence, but not this)
I am talking about the law. If there is a law that defines and governs the entire world and is independent from the world, then it should also be a Type 1 law, although I don’t think this currently exists in VSBW. However, regarding his true form, he is the one that defines and knows the entire world. So the “law” here means a law that governs the entire world, which is very similar to a concept, but under the name of a law. Therefore, it should be considered an independent law.
This is more like just it being a cosmological constant, rather than it lacking space-time outright in the BDE1 sense. Also, I'm fairly sure but, rather than being "the lack of it", it is instead one with all space-time. From yogiri's speed section:
Unless the mechanic through which it exists throughout all of time and space is explained (such as everything being an infinitesimal part of the End, which the current rating does not suggest, I would disagree and regard the end existing across all of time and space as an anti-feat.
Being present across all time and space is not an anti-feat, and this also does not mean that spacetime is a part of it as you claim.
Rather, the novel only states that it exists in all time and space; it does not say that spacetime is a part of it. What you are saying is merely your own inference that is not supported by evidence.
This is the justification, and this is what the novel states:
Omnipresent (
Exists across all the space and time,
[5][6] acting as "The End" and Limiter of the
Ultimate Ensemble World[59])
Therefore, what you are saying is not correct. The text does not state that spacetime is a part of it or that it is one with spacetime. Rather, it is only described as existing across all time and space as the End and the limiter of the Ultimate Ensemble world.
(This is what is clarified in the novel and in the justification, and if you have an issue with it, you can also open another thread.)
This doesn't work at all. For one:
- It doesn't show a changeless nature. It just shows that because everything ends at it, you can't go back once you have arrived at it. If I had to put it in an analogy, it would be the ultimate "Effect" that all Cause leads to, and also perhaps the cause itself (Since it is both Alpha and Omega), but by no means does being that (being the Final Effect) mean it lacks and transcends causality.
- Your whole argument is under the assumption that Space-Time = causality, which is not how we treat it here. The acausality page even has a note for specifically this type of argument:
Ah yes, something that's BDE1 (lack of space and time) but is literally called "Space". This just looks like plane range to me; the space exists outside the space-time of the rest of the cosmology. That does not grant BDE1 or anything close to it.
For now, I will not discuss Acausality Type 5.
There is also of course the canonity issue.
Uh, this is about the "world". You have to prove Sea of Darkness is a part of a "World" as well. I'm talking about a world as in a universe or CF, not the ultimate ensemble. Otherwise you first have to prove the same single core governs the entire ultimate ensemble and not just a "world".
Yeah no, same as above. You need to prove Sea of Darkness is encompassed by a world's information core to begin with. Based on what I read, it seems to be an individual world-by-world thing
I will respond to this when I am not busy.