• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All-purpose request thread (New forum)

This should be moved to FC/OC I believe
 
I have reverted my decision.

That discussion thread was apparently made by the user for Fraymakers mods, so I can't turn that into the verse page's general discussion thread because I would essentially be hijacking the thread and change its original purpose.

If you want, you can start a general discussion thread, and I can use that instead.

This should be moved to FC/OC I believe
I have moved the thread.
 
I have reverted my decision.

That discussion thread was apparently made by the user for Fraymakers mods, so I can't turn that into the verse page's general discussion thread because I would essentially be hijacking the thread and change its original purpose.

If you want, you can start a general discussion thread, and I can use that instead.
Ah I hadn't realized it was meant to be for mods

Here I made a general discussion thread for it (y)
 
I have reverted my decision.

That discussion thread was apparently made by the user for Fraymakers mods, so I can't turn that into the verse page's general discussion thread because I would essentially be hijacking the thread and change its original purpose.

If you want, you can start a general discussion thread, and I can use that instead.


I have moved the thread.
Please open Yogiri’s profile so that I can apply the edits that were approved in this thread ↓


And please close this thread now as well.
 
Please open Yogiri’s profile so that I can apply the edits that were approved in this thread ↓


And please close this thread now as well.
Do you even know what was actually accepted and what was not? Since most of the stuff that passed was through arguments made by others...
 
Do you even know what was actually accepted and what was not? Since most of the stuff that passed was through arguments made by others...
What are you saying??? Please stop this evasion. The staff have already agreed, and I’ve listed everything under the approvals and what has been accepted. Also, please do not reply to me again.
 
Please open Yogiri’s profile so that I can apply the edits that were approved in this thread ↓


And please close this thread now as well.
Do you even know what was actually accepted and what was not? Since most of the stuff that passed was through arguments made by others...
So, what were the exact accepted changes then?

Also, I will need someone who knows how to apply the changes while properly following our editing format.
 
Also, I will need someone who knows how to apply the changes while properly following our editing format.
@Oblivion_Of_The_Endless was the one who came with more valid evidence, which was supported. He also improved the wording. So I think he knows best. (Not to mention their is still ongoing debates there, even if it's currently by non-staff)
 
This CRT has been accepted and grace period is over, so can these pages be unlocked? 🙏
Thanks!
 
This CRT has been accepted and grace period is over, so can these pages be unlocked? 🙏
Thanks!
👌
 
So, what were the exact accepted changes then?

Also, I will need someone who knows how to apply the changes while properly following our editing format.
The accepted changes involve these types of immortality negation ( 4, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9). They have been approved by three staff members, including one administrator.

Immortality negation type 4 already existed.

Open Yogiri’s profile and I will apply the changes myself. You can also proceed with closing the thread, as I am the one who created it and I am requesting its closure.
 
@Oblivion_Of_The_Endless was the one who came with more valid evidence, which was supported. He also improved the wording. So I think he knows best. (Not to mention their is still ongoing debates there, even if it's currently by non-staff)
Speak all you want. You mean that a single random member objected and you're trying to delay the thread because of one random member, despite having more than three approvals from the staff—hahaha, ridiculous.
 
Speak all you want. You mean that a single random member objected and you're trying to delay the thread because of one random member, despite having more than three approvals from the staff—hahaha, ridiculous.
larp harder bro
Please open Yogiri’s profile so that I can apply the edits that were approved in this thread ↓


And please close this thread now as well.
most of this is STILL being argued and you're being even FURTHER obtuse
 
Done homie 👌
Lemme know if I made a mistake. Otherwise can be closed.
While you're at it, can u close the thread as well?
 
larp harder bro

most of this is STILL being argued and you're being even FURTHER obtuse
Come on, Tensura fans and their friends, go ahead and all attack here—come on, come on, come on! Where are the rest of you? Your leader objected to the topic, so you all have to defend it, come on.

I am the one who created the topic, and I am the one who requested its closure. I will apply the edits that were approved by the staff, including a manager. Anyone who doesn’t like these edits afterward can open another topic for discussion. This topic was created by me, and I decided to close it. The only person who objected was Astral, and he is not staff or anything—while you keep trying to make a big deal as if everyone opposed it, the only opponent is Astral, and he is just a member.

If there are more of you, then come out all at once and try to stop the edits. I’m waiting for all of you here.
 
I have three approvals, including one from a manager, so the topic must be applied and closed. I am also the creator of the topic, and I am the one who decides when it is closed. No one has the right to object to this because I created the topic and will close it whenever I want. Since I have three approvals, it will be implemented, and I have the right to do so. The staff here must open Yogiri’s profile to apply the edits, and I will do this myself.

Anyone who objects can open another topic to remove what they want and discuss it as they see fit.
 
Come on, Tensura fans and their friends, go ahead and all attack here—come on, come on, come on! Where are the rest of you? Your leader objected to the topic, so you all have to defend it, come on.
Can you stop turning All Purpose Threads into Drama? This is not Ace Attorney. Also i looked into thread and saw this

Agree: @Reiner04 ( Agreed on types (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9). @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless ( Agreed on types (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9). @Elizhaa ( Agreed on types (2 ,3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9). @Vietthai96 ( Agreed on types (4, 5, 7, 8, 9).

Can you be clear what do you want to apply there? Cuz if others are still being argued you can only apply 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9
 
Can you stop turning All Purpose Threads into Drama? This is not Ace Attorney. Also i looked into thread and saw this

Agree: @Reiner04 ( Agreed on types (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9). @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless ( Agreed on types (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9). @Elizhaa ( Agreed on types (2 ,3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9). @Vietthai96 ( Agreed on types (4, 5, 7, 8, 9).

Can you be clear what do you want to apply there? Cuz if others are still being argued you can only apply 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9
Yes, I only want to apply these types because types 1, 2, and 6 were rejected.
I want to apply only what was approved by the staff, which are these types: (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9).
 
Yes, I only want to apply these types because types 1, 2, and 6 were rejected.
I want to apply only what was approved by the staff, which are these types: (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9).
My man, you are still missing the point, sure they were "accepted", but not for the reasons in the OP, so I am worried you will try to insert the OP but not the "reason it was accepted."
 
My man, you are still missing the point, sure they were "accepted", but not for the reasons in the OP, so I am worried you will try to insert the OP but not the "reason it was accepted."
The edits will be like this, and I already know the necessary reasons. Of course, the changes that will be made to Yogiri’s profile will not be exactly in the same form as I presented in the thread.

 
I was suggested that this thread should be moved to calc group discussion

 

This match was already added to the profiles and can be closed
As this has already happened and no changes to the profiles altered the result in the slightest, as per discussed in the threads, and future revisions for Alexandre were discussed in this last one, i'd like to call attention for the mods to not remove this from the profiles, except in the case of rematches, of course.
 
It’s really strange. I mean, you open a thread and it gets approved, and then when you ask to apply the edits and close the thread, no one responds or does their job here.

I am the only active supporter who has worked hard for Yogiri’s upgrade since he had nothing when I joined, and now the staff are refusing to open his profile for me.
 
It’s really strange. I mean, you open a thread and it gets approved, and then when you ask to apply the edits and close the thread, no one responds or does their job here.

I am the only active supporter who has worked hard for Yogiri’s upgrade since he had nothing when I joined, and now the staff are refusing to open his profile for me.
Dude. People are confused on what was accepted. Give it time.
 
Accidentally posted it before I was finished typing it out

Managed to update it in time before anyone responded so it should all be fine now
 
Last edited:
Dude. People are confused on what was accepted. Give it time.
So three staff members agreed, and most of the members agreed as well. The only thing left was to close the thread and apply the edits, when suddenly a random user appears out of nowhere and says he does not agree with one accepted type—Type 3—even though Oblivion_Of_The_Endless himself explained the matter here and provided a response and proof here.

For me, this is completely illogical: ignoring all staff statements, three approvals, and the majority of members agreeing, and then after the thread reaches four pages, one person comes and objects to a single type that has already been explained by @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless s, an expert in instant death whose name is listed among the instant death experts. Meanwhile, the only person objecting to that one type is a Tensura fan with no expertise. I personally tried to respond to him and explain the matter further, but it was useless. After that, he is now receiving support from other Tensura fans; even when they were reported a week ago, they all came to defend each other, even against the staff.

This is the thread. You can verify it yourself if you want, and that is all.

If someone disagrees and cannot accept it, they can create a removal thread after the edits are applied.
 
So three staff members agreed, and most of the members agreed as well. The only thing left was to close the thread and apply the edits, when suddenly a random user appears out of nowhere and says he does not agree with one accepted type—Type 3—even though Oblivion_Of_The_Endless himself explained the matter here and provided a response and proof here.

For me, this is completely illogical: ignoring all staff statements, three approvals, and the majority of members agreeing, and then after the thread reaches four pages, one person comes and objects to a single type that has already been explained by @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless s, an expert in instant death whose name is listed among the instant death experts. Meanwhile, the only person objecting to that one type is a Tensura fan with no expertise. I personally tried to respond to him and explain the matter further, but it was useless. After that, he is now receiving support from other Tensura fans; even when they were reported a week ago, they all came to defend each other, even against the staff.

This is the thread. You can verify it yourself if you want, and that is all.

If someone disagrees and cannot accept it, they can create a removal thread after the edits are applied.
That's not the problem. It got accepted.

But what exactly got accepted? That's what people are confused about. Just wait and stop derailing this thread.
 
This CRT is done and the OP have asked for it to be closed.
 
I was suggested that this thread should be moved to calc group discussion

It seems that Random-Helper have already done so.

Accidentally posted it before I was finished typing it out

Managed to update it in time before anyone responded so it should all be fine now
Are you using the Sandbox feature of this forum?

You can usually avoid issues like those if you write them on a sandbox in advance.

This CRT is done and the OP have asked for it to be closed.
I have handled it.
 
I have handled it.
0ee11a2dd635.gif
 
That's not the problem. It got accepted.

But what exactly got accepted? That's what people are confused about. Just wait and stop derailing this thread.
I already wrote what was accepted in the thread under the approvals section.

These types were accepted (3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9).

Type 4 was already present in the profile.

@Oblivion_Of_The_Endless approval here ( 3,4,5, 7,8,9)
@Reiner04 approval here ( 3,4,5,7,8,9)
@Elizhaa approval here (2 ,3,4,5, 7,8,9)
 

Can someone unlock these profiles please? 🙏 (to add the accepted changes)
 

Can someone unlock these profiles please? 🙏 (to add the accepted changes)
They’re open
 
This thread can now be closed, it has been mostly implemented, with the rest requiring further speed reworks before fully integrating...
 
Back
Top