• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Amakasu vs Reinhard

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
8,998
Reaction score
2,927
Context: Amakasu got annoyed that BB was stolen but apparently Reinhard "loves" him too.

In this match of hax and going by our rules, who ultimately wins and why?

Reinhard vs Amakasu

Rules: Both at 5-B, equalize speed. Amakasu can summon whatever he wants and Reinhard can summon whatever he wants, too. If Ragnarowned somehow makes this unfair, restrict it.
 
>> and going by our rules, who ultimately wins and why?

WoG said Garou would be superior to Boros, they had one pretty big Inconclusive match.

Also that probs took into account some 1-A stuff that unrestricted Reinhard has too such as Merc's immortality.
 
What Ever said. WoG stated that if Amakasu were to be Dies Irae, the first thing he'd do is fight Reinhard...and die.
 
FateAlbane said:
>> and going by our rules, who ultimately wins and why?
WoG said Garou would be superior to Boros, they had one pretty big Inconclusive match.
 
The fact that authors hardly ever gauge the powers of characters as accurately as we try to. So the variables change entirely.

Or do we take the game as confirmation that say, Kirby is below human level by being damaged by an apple falling on its head?
 
@Fate

He didn't, tho.

He said they would be evenly matched with Garou having an advantage in close combat.

Also you can't extrapolate that Masada was referring to that. He just said Amakasu would lose.
 
He never said Garou was superior, he said Garou would have the advantage in hand to hand and that they would be on par with eachother, not superior.
 
FateAlbane said:
The fact that authors hardly ever gauge the powers of characters as accurately as we try to. So the variables change entirely.
/\ This still stands.
 
CrossverseCrisis said:
And Fate now gave me a reason to hate stupid ***** ass fights like this,.
And this reply doesn't add a single thing to the thread but derail.
 
The Everlasting said:
I don't see what that has to do with it.
WoG says Reinhard > Amakasu. That's what we need to know.
WoG does not gauge things as accurately. Even the policy of author statements is being questioned by now if the source material shows stuff in a different way. Death of the Author is a thing, you do know that?
 
Ultimately this comes down to who pulls their trump card first.

I give it to Amakasu via Ragnorok being able to cancel Low Godly regen which in turn finishes Reinhard off.
 
CrossverseCrisis said:
And now i dislike you even more now than ever...
Because of a thread? If you want to dislike someone because of something as trivial as a vs debate, go ahead. Your life.
 
@Fate

When an author literally says that Character A is stronger than Character B, both of whom he owns and created, what reason do we have to assume otherwise?
 
@Ever Just do us all a favor and close this.

At this rate I can already see far where exactly all this is going. We'll just be here wasting my time on a senseless discussion which will ultimately not go anywhere, and Cross is getting triggered saying he hates people because literally I just made a Vs Thread.

That's pretty silly.

The moment it devolves into arguments against users is the moment I lose interest, so yeah. Pretty stupid. Close it and save me the trouble.

To all your points, my answer is now: "Sure, whatever, close it, I was wrong."

Done, now we can end this sillyness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top