• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Another Hoyoverse Downgrade | 1-B to High 1-C

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
470
Reaction score
307
The god-tiers of Hoyoverse are currently rated at 1-B via scaling to the Imaginary Tree, which is the origin of everything, stores everything (particularly, it stores everything as if it were game data), is supposedly akin to a bulk neutral hyperspace, contains infinite 11-D multiverses, and would logically contain an uncountable amount of bubble worlds since it runs on MWI. However, none of these are valid evidence for a higher dimensional tier at all, and I will explain why each of these are invalid evidence.

First of all, neither being the "origin" of something nor "storing" something (even an infinite amount of it) indicates a higher dimensional tier. This is pretty obvious.

Now on to the seemingly-stronger evidence...

The imaginary tree stores everything as game data

The Imaginary Tree is stated to store everything as if it were game data. However, this doesn't prove any sort of quantitative superiority (nor does it prove qualitative superiority, mind you). A game server doesn't have uncountably infinite quantitative superiority over its game data, but it does have a great deal of control over its game data (basically hax). Likewise, the Imaginary Tree doesn't necessarily have uncountably infinite quantitative superiority over the bubble worlds it contains, it simply has a great deal of control/hax over those bubble worlds. Note that while a data/server analogy could prove R>F-like relationships or even straight-up R>F, the analogy in Honkai Impact simply doesn't go that far. The relationship between the Imaginary Tree and its 11D worlds is more similar to the relationship between Flowey and the timelines he controls or between Monika and the timeline she controls than some sort of uncountably infinite quantitative superiority.

The bulk/hyperspace argument

It is also claimed that the Imaginary Tree acts as a bulk neutral hyperspace, containing infinite 11-D multiverses (both of these statements work hand-in-hand, so I can address both at once). However, the former is never proven and does not follow from the latter. All that we know is that the Imaginary Tree contains an infinite multiverse of 11-D bubble worlds. The issue is that we already know that containing an infinite amount of x-dimensional worlds and being larger than it does not indicate n+1-dimensionality. Just because the Imaginary Tree contains infinite 11-D multiverses doesn't mean that it is 1-B

Even if one were to argue that the Imaginary Tree must be +1 dimensional tier above the 11-D multiverses it contains because it encompasses a collection of them that are separated by a "significant distance", this still isn't a valid justification. Here in this image one can see that it's quite possible for multiple lengths/intervals, each separated by a "significant distance" to be "encompassed" by a length/interval of equal length/cardinality; that is, without any need for higher infinities or extra dimensions. Here, the infinite lengths/cardinalities [0, ω] and [2ω, 3ω] are both separated by an significant distance and are "encompassed" by the interval [-ω, 3ω+1]. No higher cardinalities or extra dimensions are necessary. Sure, this image only contains a finite number of infinite intervals/lengths, but you could repeat this an infinite number of times without the need for higher infinities or extra dimensions. For example, the interval [-ω^2, ω^2] "encompasses" all of the intervals (ω*n, ω*n+1) where n is an even number. It "encompasses" an infinite number of infinitely long lengths/intervals that are each separated by a "significant" infinite length/interval, yet no higher cardinalitities or extra dimensions are necessary.

The MWI argument

Finally, it is claimed that Honkai runs on MWI, so there would be an uncountably infinite amount of bubble worlds. While I do agree that MWI would probably logically result in there being uncountably many worlds, we simply don't have any proof that Honkai runs on MWI to begin with. The writer of the CRT claims that they provided proof for MWI in this thread, but neither MWI nor the many worlds interpretation are even mentioned in that thread.

Going back to the Part 2 thread, the writer claims that this scan proves that Honkai operates under MWI, but all that does is prove that there are infinite possibilities that sprout from each world. That's it. This doesn't prove MWI because MWI isn't just "the theory that there are infinite branching worlds," it's a theory based off a very specific, particular interpretation of quantum mechanics that also assumes that the wave function doesn't collapse and that all possible quantum states are actually real. In short, the existence of "infinite worlds" doesn't prove MWI, so we shouldn't assume Honkai actually has MWI merely based on statements confirming that it has infinite worlds.

Conclusion

As a result, all of the god tiers that currently scale to 1-B should be downgraded to High 1-C (11-D).

Agree:
Disagree:
Neutral:
 
The imaginary tree stores everything as game data

The Imaginary Tree is stated to store everything as if it were game data. However, this doesn't prove any sort of quantitative superiority (nor does it prove qualitative superiority, mind you). A game server doesn't have uncountably infinite quantitative superiority over its game data, but it does have a great deal of control over its game data (basically hax). Likewise, the Imaginary Tree doesn't necessarily have uncountably infinite quantitative superiority over the bubble worlds it contains, it simply has a great deal of control/hax over those bubble worlds. Note that while a data/server analogy could prove R>F-like relationships or even straight-up R>F, the analogy in Honkai Impact simply doesn't go that far. The relationship between the Imaginary Tree and its 11D worlds is more similar to the relationship between Flowey and the timelines he controls or between Monika and the timeline she controls than some sort of uncountably infinite quantitative superiority.
it does prove a R>F relationship because a server is more real than the game it stores, and can do anything to game.
The bulk/hyperspace argument

It is also claimed that the Imaginary Tree acts as a bulk neutral hyperspace, containing infinite 11-D multiverses (both of these statements work hand-in-hand, so I can address both at once). However, the former is never proven and does not follow from the latter. All that we know is that the Imaginary Tree contains an infinite multiverse of 11-D bubble worlds. The issue is that we already know that containing an infinite amount of x-dimensional worlds and being larger than it does not indicate n+1-dimensionality. Just because the Imaginary Tree contains infinite 11-D multiverses doesn't mean that it is 1-B

Even if one were to argue that the Imaginary Tree must be +1 dimensional tier above the 11-D multiverses it contains because it encompasses a collection of them that are separated by a "significant distance", this still isn't a valid justification. Here in this image one can see that it's quite possible for multiple lengths/intervals, each separated by a "significant distance" to be "encompassed" by a length/interval of equal length/cardinality; that is, without any need for higher infinities or extra dimensions. Here, the infinite lengths/cardinalities [0, ω] and [2ω, 3ω] are both separated by an significant distance and are "encompassed" by the interval [-ω, 3ω+1]. No higher cardinalities or extra dimensions are necessary. Sure, this image only contains a finite number of infinite intervals/lengths, but you could repeat this an infinite number of times without the need for higher infinities or extra dimensions. For example, the interval [-ω^2, ω^2] "encompasses" all of the intervals (ω*n, ω*n+1) where n is an even number. It "encompasses" an infinite number of infinitely long lengths/intervals that are each separated by a "significant" infinite length/interval, yet no higher cardinalitities or extra dimensions are necessary.
It not just contains infinite bubbles of 11D but it also have R>F relation with them according to game-server analogy, so no you should see both of them in context of each other.

so overall i disagree
 
that relationship is like a dreamer and dream, who is more real?
Actually, no. A more accurate analogy would be the "brain stimuli that create said dream". The dream itself WOULD BE a meaningful difference, but the stimuli themselves wouldn't. This is the same issue regarding game-server. Stocking data (that are, for all intent and purpose, still "within the reality") in a server isn't a qualitative gap.
 
Actually, no. A more accurate analogy would be the "brain stimuli that create said dream". The dream itself WOULD BE a meaningful difference, but the stimuli themselves wouldn't. This is the same issue regarding game-server. Stocking data (that are, for all intent and purpose, still "within the reality") in a server isn't a qualitative gap.
dreams are also based on irl memories you see in your life, but that does not mean dreams are as real as dreamer.

same with games, they are also based on some irl data, but that does not mean games are as real as server.
 
dreams are also based on irl stimulus you see in your life, but that does not mean dreams are as real as dreamer.
Except that in the case of those stuff, we don't scale the "brain stimuli" but we scale the dream itself. In Umineko, some verses are in the form of a book, but we don't scale the "book" itself, we scale the "world within the book", obviously, since the book is merely a physical manifestation in a higher world.
same with games, they are also based on some irl data, but that does not mean games are as real as server.
Game and server are quite literally made of the same thing. The only difference is their purpose. (Game is, well, gaming/data and a server is a place where you keep data).

This is the same logic as saying "there is a R>F difference between a folder on my desktop and my SSD".
 
Except that in the case of those stuff, we don't scale the "brain stimuli" but we scale the dream itself. In Umineko, some verses are in the form of a book, but we don't scale the "book" itself, we scale the "world within the book", obviously, since the book is merely a physical manifestation in a higher world.
well but here case is different as imaginary tree is not merely a physical manifestation


Game and server are quite literally made of the same thing. The only difference is their purpose. (Game is, well, gaming/data and a server is a place where you keep data).

This is the same logic as saying "there is a R>F difference between a folder on my desktop and my SSD".
how are they made of same thing? what is that "same" thing?
 
how are they made of same thing? what is that "same" thing?
Data.

Imagine you have a (physical) server. You boot it up and all to start Windows. You then create a Linux Virtual Machine. No matter the level at which you make a relationship, it's still within the same quality.

Server and Windows = The first one is physical, but the data needed to start up windows (and the data of windows overall) are still "within reality" in the form of electric currents ig? I'm not that well versed in stuff like this, but you get the idea.

Windows and VM = Self-explanatory, data and data are quite literally the same thing.

Server and VM = Same relationship as first one.
well but here case is different as imaginary tree is not merely a physical manifestation
I don't know much about the details, I just mentioned the relationship stuff.
 
Data.

Imagine you have a (physical) server. You boot it up and all to start Windows. You then create a Linux Virtual Machine. No matter the level at which you make a relationship, it's still within the same quality.

Server and Windows = The first one is physical, but the data needed to start up windows (and the data of windows overall) are still "within reality" in the form of electric currents ig? I'm not that well versed in stuff like this, but you get the idea.

Windows and VM = Self-explanatory, data and data are quite literally the same thing.

Server and VM = Same relationship as first one.
by same logic dream is also made of neurotransmitters (equivalent of electric currents in computer)

so does that mean we should remove whole R>F thing?
 
by same logic dream is also made of neurotransmitters (equivalent of electric currents in computer)
I explained to you why dream and dreamer can work. We don't scale the stimuli, we scale the dream directly. Unless you can prove that the whole "data/game" is nothing but a representation of a higher world and that they aren't "literally" made of data (but translated that way by the higher being/realm) then it's a no-go.
so does that mean we should remove R>F thing?
No, it just doesn't work for Hoyoverse with only this much. Maybe there are other stuff to back it up, though.
 
by same logic dream is also made of neurotransmitters (equivalent of electric currents in computer)

so does that mean we should remove R>F thing?
It's more like the imaginary tree holds existence in the form of data in that it manages and controls existence in a way information type 2 does rather than holding a superior position like how a person in a higher reality views the world as a video game.
 
I explained to you why dream and dreamer can work. We don't scale the stimuli, we scale the dream directly.
well in case of dream stimuli would be our memories of life and in case of game it would be input of user

if we don't scale stimuli it means we don't scale memories(for dream) and input(for server)

we scale dream means we scale game.

there is clear parallel in these things


Unless you can prove that the whole "data/game" is nothing but a representation of a higher world and that they aren't "literally" made of data (but translated that way by the higher being/realm) then it's a no-go.
Yeah it was just an analogy and not literal as said in screenshots.
 
well in case of dream stimuli would be our memories of life and in case of server it would be input of user
They may or may not influence the dream itself, but they aren't "literally" the dream. Although in most case, a dream would scale 11-C (inferior quality) by default.
if we don't scale stimuli it means we don't scale memories(for dream) and input(for server)
That's...not how it works. When Featherine write something into existence using her plot manipulation, it has nothing to do (beside the origin of the ability, perhaps) with the fundamental nature of the difference between her and the world she's currently into.
we scale dream means we scale game.
I mean, we do scale both, just not the way you think.
Yeah it was just an analogy and not literal as said in screenshots.
Ditto what MGQscaler said. Also, I'm almost sure it's a convoluted explanation to just explain that the Imaginary Tree is a multiverse.
 
it does prove a R>F relationship because a server is more real than the game it stores, and can do anything to game.

It not just contains infinite bubbles of 11D but it also have R>F relation with them according to game-server analogy, so no you should see both of them in context of each other.

so overall i disagree
"Server" can mean different things depending on context. It can mean hardware OR software. But that also means that in many cases, a "server" is literally just more software/data. It's just another program. Programs don't have R>F over other programs. Due to Occam's Razor we shouldn't go with an interpretation that assumes R>F if we can also go with an interpretation that doesn't assume R>F.

Further supporting the lack of R>F is the fact that no R>F-like distinction is ever made. They never say "this server treats you as fiction, it's more real than you, you could never affect the Tree no matter how much stronger you get." They only ever talk about how the Tree as a server is able to change the records of the world whereas people within those worlds usually can't unless they ascend to the Tree. It's just a matter of greater control over reality; we shouldn't extrapolate on this analogy to give it a meaning that it wasn't supposed to have.

Also, keep in mind that we're not talking about proper R>F here in the sense of qualitative superiority. That's already disproven by the fact that there's only a quantitative difference between the Imaginary Tree and Earth (which is just part of the "game data"). At best you can argue a bastardized R>F-like relationship with quantitative superiority, but as I've already explained that isn't the case either.
 
"3rd Coming" Scale I'm making
Will be rejected and closed.
https://images-ext-1.**********.net/external/489VuH7I8sbYwnTCeOq3iD8EUigD07zLaL55u5iIVis/https/cdn.**********.com/emojis/1202150054199308328.png
 
Will be rejected and closed.
https://images-ext-1.**********.net/external/489VuH7I8sbYwnTCeOq3iD8EUigD07zLaL55u5iIVis/https/cdn.**********.com/emojis/1202150054199308328.png
Is this because of some god forgiven 3 month rule or is it because you think i'd lose?
 
Technically, the thread about whether the verse should be rated 1-B or High 1-C wasn’t rejected but rather left inconclusive. So, this CRT can remain open.
Do you agree or disagree with the downgrade?
 
Technically, the thread about whether the verse should be rated 1-B or High 1-C wasn’t rejected but rather left inconclusive. So, this CRT can remain open.
Bump. Do you agree with the downgrade?
 
Absolutely not. In fact, the initial downgrade shouldn't even have happened.

Pulled straight from the definition of Low 1-A from the wiki
"As a general rule-of-thumb, statements of being "above dimensions" and the like, whenever validly indicating a superiority over higher dimensions, fall under this tier without further context."

The tree doesn't exists in any dimension


Tree transcends reality


The Cocoon transcends dimensions




Based on this alone, Hoyoverse cosmology is minimum L1-A
 
Last edited:
Absolutely not. In fact, the initial downgrade shouldn't even have happened.

Pulled straight from the definition of Low 1-A from the wiki
"As a general rule-of-thumb, statements of being "above dimensions" and the like, whenever validly indicating a superiority over higher dimensions, fall under this tier without further context."

The tree doesn't exists in any dimension


Tree transcends reality


The Cocoon transcends dimensions




Based on this alone, Hoyoverse cosmology is minimum L1-A

99% sure you still have to prove that it is a qualitative difference, but hey, I'm not an expert so it would be best to get more knowledgeable ppl here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top