Archetype question

[HakutoRei000]

What tier would one get if the Archetype was categorized as "Something certain, undeniable, not a lie, the highest point of truth below Divinity"
And at the same time is the original embodiment of something. Like a source but not a source in the sense of an object, more like a Hierarchy that this Archetype is at the bottom of the endless layers and is at the "Top" of the layers themselves.

 

[HakutoRei000]

Bump

 

[Xearesay]

Needs more context, and by that I mean we’d need to know the tier of the layers this archetypes transcendence corresponds to.

 

[HakutoRei000]

Needs more context, and by that I mean we’d need to know the tier of the layers this archetypes transcendence corresponds to.

Each archetype is essentially a Form or Idea that evolves from a higher archetype—originating from those at the top of the truth-hierarchy. Lower-tier archetypes cannot be "good" or "pure" no matter how refined they appear, because their very foundation is derived from a less truthful, more distorted level of reality. Only the highest archetypes possess the purity and certainty that make them true embodiments of their concepts. Lower ones are merely echoes—diluted reflections that can never transcend their flawed origin.

However, these lower-tier archetypes still operate in accordance with Plato’s notion of Ideas—where the material or manifested world is merely a fractal, an imperfect reflection of a purer, more original realm. Thus, even the flawed archetypes function as necessary shadows or imprints of the higher truth, maintaining a structural continuity across layers of reality
.

 

[Xearesay]

Each archetype is essentially a Form or Idea that evolves from a higher archetype—originating from those at the top of the truth-hierarchy. Lower-tier archetypes cannot be "good" or "pure" no matter how refined they appear, because their very foundation is derived from a less truthful, more distorted level of reality. Only the highest archetypes possess the purity and certainty that make them true embodiments of their concepts. Lower ones are merely echoes—diluted reflections that can never transcend their flawed origin.

However, these lower-tier archetypes still operate in accordance with Plato’s notion of Ideas—where the material or manifested world is merely a fractal, an imperfect reflection of a purer, more original realm. Thus, even the flawed archetypes function as necessary shadows or imprints of the higher truth, maintaining a structural continuity across layers of reality
.

You can likely get 1-A for the lower archetypes since physical reality is a mere shadow of something truer, that being the world of forms/archetypes. This would meet the R>F requirement as being truer is the same as being more real, with that more realness being over physical existence itself which can be extrapolated to quantitative jumps in transcendence. And since there is a greater hierarchy of higher archetypes within the world of forms, that would extend forever into outerversal.

The true archetypes would be baseline High 1-A as they would be generating the very framework of flawed-ness in which the lower archetypes participate within in in both content and structuring. This is because flawed-ness is being used here to describe anything that relates in a way where it’s derived from a more superior(more real) layer of reality. If the true archetypes are not flawed but derivate all flawed structures, then they’re operating on a more fundamental system than whatever the physical universe and flawed archetypes are operating on.