• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Black Clover: Discussion Rule Proposal

Status
Not open for further replies.

CloverDragon03

He/Him
VS Battles
Calculation Group
13,106
20,825
So recently, there's been a certain topic in Black Clover that people have repeatedly made CRTs for, without any new evidence. It's often the same arguments that have been addressed in a previous CRT, and it's been getting tiring dealing with it all the time.

That topic is, of course, Black Divider scaling above Conquering Eon.

The arguments for this not being the case have boiled down to “it was Anti-Magic hax, not AP” which relies on the assumption that a devil’s heart is made of magic, which we cannot assume to be true. Regardless, numerous CRTs have been made about the topic with this same argument, and as such I want to propose a discussion rule that Black Divider scaling to Conquering Eon should not be discussed unless new, relevant information is brought in.
 
Couldn’t you say the same thing for any other verse discussion rule?
There is a difference, those not only those happened on a far more frequent basis but are also know for generating a far higher level of toxicity
Making a black divider discussion rule seens like overreacting
 
Is this really necessary like,awsering the same argument is annoying but this seens extreme
I actually asked Damage about this before making this since I wanted to be sure and he said that it’d be fair to propose a discussion rule
 
I think it’s best to clarify that the arguments can’t consist of what was said in the OP. At least then people can make crts for it with new arguments
 
I think it’s best to clarify that the arguments can’t consist of what was said in the OP. At least then people can make crts for it with new arguments
That’s why I said “unless new, relevant information is brought up”
 
This seems unanimous. I'll add it as a note on the Black Clover verse page.
 
I can temporarily unlock the page for you if you are willing to handle the addition.
 
Okay. No problem. Tell me here when you are done.
 
Okay. Thank you for helping out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top