- 8,438
- 3,292
After the creation of my thread pointing out the heavy clutter of calcs, it has been agreed upon that the process needs to be streamlined. Two changes are suggested. The first is a priority system in which requests and evaluations are listed on a priority level, allowing for the group to more effectively do the most important calculations. Second is a standard format for Calculations themselves, Requests, and Evaluations.
For example, we can give a format in which the requester must follow an order and description of the request... e.g...
The calcs themselves would have rules established as to format and requirements (important numbers/formulas bolded, outside-wiki values cited, scientific notation used, ect.) to make the calc easier to read and quickly understand.
Evaluations would just need the same as the request, but without the feat video/description, as both of those should be in the calculation itself.
Of course this is all just what I came up with; this is open to all of the Calc group members and staff: What should be required for the format?
For example, we can give a format in which the requester must follow an order and description of the request... e.g...
- Insert Importance/Priority Here (Once agreed upon and implemented)
- Verse/Character Name
- Feat Brief Descriptio ("Mountain Bust", "Tank Explosion", "Planet Bust", ect.)
- Feat Video/Picture When Applicable (Picture inserted/video linked; no manga or other laggy/hard to navigate sites)
- Feat Description and Context (A full explanation of what is going on. Any unusual circumstances or justifications for destruction values, assertion of real lightning, ect. stated here)
The calcs themselves would have rules established as to format and requirements (important numbers/formulas bolded, outside-wiki values cited, scientific notation used, ect.) to make the calc easier to read and quickly understand.
Evaluations would just need the same as the request, but without the feat video/description, as both of those should be in the calculation itself.
Of course this is all just what I came up with; this is open to all of the Calc group members and staff: What should be required for the format?