Combined/Composite Human Downgrade

[WeeklyBattles]

We currently rate the Combined Human and Composite Human as being 6-C with prep time scaling to The World's Nuclear Weapon Stockpile / Arsenal. There's just one problem though, the arsenal is only 6-C because it's the combined yield of all nukes in the world, when all of these nukes individually only have a yield of Low 7-C to 7-B. The Combined and Composite Humans should be changed to Low 7-C to 7-B with prep time unless there is a more powerful weapon they can get their hands on.

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

I was thinking about it earlier.

I think that just 7-B is fine.

 

[The_Everlasting]

I was thinking about it earlier.
I think that just 7-B is fine.

This.

 

[Golden_Void]

Agreed.

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

We have like ten thousand or so right?

 

[Fllflourine]

I agree, it'd take a ridiculous amount of time to be able to get all of those nukes anyway, many of which are now decomissioned.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I agree, it'd take a ridiculous amount of time to be able to get all of those nukes anyway, many of which are now decomissioned.

Its not even that, even if the CH DID get every nuke in existence it wouldnt equal a 6-C attack, just a huge bombardment of Low 7-C to 7-B attacks

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Also our Arsenal profile is ugly. We have the explanation in the Tiering for some reasons.

 

[Fllflourine]

Mind if I change that on the Arsenal page right about now?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

PLease do

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Also i could be wrong but i thouught the aresnal has gotten smaller recently?

 

[Fllflourine]

Did so.

 

[Lightbuster30]

Can't we theoretically make gigaton nukes, but choose not to as the fallout would destroy almost everyone else too?

 

[Fllflourine]

100 Megatons is about the highest we've gotten (and that is thereotical, with a Uranium tamper with the Tsar Bomba rather than lead); and even then, no one has actually made a gigaton nuke, which is not really feasible/practical in the first place, at least with our current tech.

 

[VersusJunkie54]

100 Megatons is about the highest we've gotten (and that is thereotical, with a Uranium tamper with the Tsar Bomba rather than lead); and even then, no one has actually made a gigaton nuke, which is not really feasible/practical in the first place, at least with our current tech.

I've heard that yields over a gigaton are possible. That was the cold war, and tech has progressed. The Soviets didn't consider more than 100 megatons and downgraded to 50 because the fallout would cause problems, and the plane that dropped it would've been vaporised.


Anyways I support this downgrade. Combined Human would need a rediciuous amount of prep time to get every nuke in the world.

 

[Fllflourine]

@VersusJunkie

It would be possible, but it wouldn't be practical compared to simply making many nuclear weapons of smaller yields.

Anyways, let's go back on topic.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Should this be applied?

 

[DMUA]

I approve.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Alright, ive made the changes

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Aaaa Weekly why "7-C to 7-B".

7-B is sufficient unless you want to list every weapon that CH can get. And we will end up with "9-B to 7-B".

 

[WeeklyBattles]

How about 'At Most 7-B'?

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Either "up to" or just outright 7-B. At most imply that it's below 7-B in some capacity.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I mean the strongest weapon we have is the Tsar Bomba right? That's only 50 Megatons, right in the middle of 7-B

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Ye but "At most" is the antithesis of At least.

It implies you're below X level but still comparable in some capacity.

"Up to" seems like the best option.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Mkay, i'll fix it

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Better?

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

Yee. To me at least.

 

[Fllflourine]

Woa.