Cosmology Blog Question

[AlipheeseXIV]

How exactly do you go about getting a cosmology blog accepted on a page? Do you need a CRT even though you're just explaining existing concepts on a verse page? Or are you able to add a cosmology blog for a verse without a CRT similarly to non tier 2 or higher character profiles since they don't technically affect any character tiers?

 

[Vietthai96]

You need to make a cosmology page and release it, not personal blog

Secondly, you need to make CRT for it, unless all the stuff you plan to add was already accepted. Though i recommend to make a CRT even in this scenario

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

You need to make a cosmology page and release it, not personal blog

Secondly, you need to make CRT for it, unless all the stuff you plan to add was already accepted. Though i recommend to make a CRT even in this scenario

Ok...I have question then, how exactly is acceptance of it going to be handled? Because unlike normal CRT's for character tiers or P&A's, cosmology based stuff isn't really something that can be properly evaluated unless a person is a knowledgeable member of said verse. Like to give an example, if I theoretically made a cosmology CRT and added stuff from x verse, but some staff who knows nothing about the verse disagrees with it then...like what happens? Also what staff is going to evaluate a cosmology blog of a large but nonpopular verse, would take ages to get accepted

 

[Vietthai96]

Staff still need to evaluate based on the evidences you presents on your blog, knowledgeable members of the verse or not, everything still need to be evaluated by neutral party for fairness, you can't dismiss staff evaluation simply because they don't have knowledge of the verse, because if we can do that, then everyone can just wank the verse they supports with the excuse of "i'm knowledgeable member of the verse so i know everything while you know nothing of it". Even if they do not know anything about the verse, as long as staff provide the reason for their vote, you need to count their vote and evaluation nonetheless

Of course, staff themselves need to stay fair when evaluating the CRT, if you think they are unfair, you could report them to Human Resource staff member for staff punishment, though again you need evidence that staff is unfair, not empty word

Anyway, nothing is perfect, staff have their opinion which something clash with the verse supporters, doesn't mean their evaluation is invalid

Also what staff is going to evaluate a cosmology blog of a large but nonpopular verse, would take ages to get accepted

Not only cosmology blog, but most big CRT, staff need to divide their attention for many thing while normal member can dedicate their time to a single thread of a single verse. There are also real life issues too, so if you plan to make a too big CRT with too many thing, expecting that it will not get the interaction you want

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

then everyone can just wank the verse they supports with the excuse of "i'm knowledgeable member of the verse so i know everything while you know nothing of it". Even if they do not know anything about the verse, as long as staff provide the reason for their vote, you need to count their vote and evaluation nonetheless

Yeah well of course, my point was more so if a knowledgeable member who also understands the wiki's guidelines and practices with what is and isn't accepted makes a cosmology blog that just details and outlines already existing and accepted things on a verse, what's the point of making a CRT to get it evaluated? At that point, it isn't even about whether or not it will be accepted, it just logically should be. I can understand if the cosmology blog details things that aren't yet on a verse page but if it's just existing things like...what exactly is there to evaluate?

Of course, staff themselves need to stay fair when evaluating the CRT, if you think they are unfair, you could report them to Human Resource staff member for staff punishment, though again you need evidence that staff is unfair, not empty word

Mm...

Anyway, nothing is perfect, staff have their opinion which something clash with the verse supporters, doesn't mean their evaluation is invalid

I mean if their opinion was (theoretically in this case) wrong, then...their evaluation by extension should, by all accounts be invalid though?

Not only cosmology blog, but most big CRT, staff need to divide their attention for many thing while normal member can dedicate their time to a single thread of a single verse. There are also real life issues too, so if you plan to make a too big CRT with too many thing, expecting that it will not get the interaction you want

Well yeah of course, that's natural and I agree with your point there. But in this case, it wouldn't even be that the CRT itself is long so much so that the actual content covered in the cosmology page itself is astronomical. Like how many staff would truly dedicate the time to properly evaluate a cosmology page over 8k words long? And, even then assuming a staff member does this. How long would such a process take? Like, it's an absurd amount of time for something that's largely parroting already existing concepts, abilities, etc.

But yeah, naturally that is the only conclusion. Of course it's going to take ages, nothing can be done in that aspect.