That doesn't make sense. Ockham's Razor; if there isn't enough information available to come to a reasonable conclusion, we have to go with the choice that makes the least assumptions. There is less assumptions involved in it just having high resilience, even supported by quotes such as "It kept tearing apart my squad, but with half of its torso gone." and "But it was taking damage? ... If it was, it wasn't showing it. It must have lost all its organs, all its blood, but it didn't acknowledge any of it.". There are far more assumptions in saying it healed all of those wounds, and they didn't happen to mention any regenerative abilities on the main file or in the interview.
I would probably want to also kill something that can continue to survive with most of its torso off and still go on killing sprees as soon as possible. At best, you have a "Possibly" that isn't even combat applicable.
"ER-A 3 fires three more shots; the first two miss, and the third hits SCP-096 in the head. SCP-096 falls, skids, and rolls several times, reducing its speed minimally. SCP-096 rolls to its feet and continues unabated."
It doesn't say anything here about healing from the wound, it just flinches and doesn't appear to be injured by it. Again, there are much more assumptions in regards to saying it can regenerate. If it could, it would be on the main file, as that's pretty significant.
Glad that it got removed, that confused me.
Extrasensory Perception doesn't make sense. There isn't anything stating that it is "sensing" anything other than the location of its target. "Ability to detect energy signatures, matter signatures, or the like near the user.". It's only ever said that it knows the location, and there is nothing about how it does that. I read through 1-A and couldn't find anything.