• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Deleting Star vs. the Forces of Evil verse

Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe it's not that simple, but still I kinda want to preserve that verse on vsbw in some shape and form, at least main cast
 
AppleMaker said:
I'd say I'm neutral about it, since you know, you can just make a CRT like this, where you use your csap versions of their profiles and explain why they are better. But those who weren't scaled currently could be deleted from the verse page
Click to expand...
Well that guy just added abilities to one character, while I’d need to revamp the entire verse with all haxes, abilities, calcs, etc., which would take too much time and effort, all while having zero other supporters and CRTs/calcs taking very long to get accepted (it takes long to even nuke this verse, now imagine for every CRT and calc).

Even if I want to do that in the future, it’s better to delete it first and then re-introduce as I said here:
TheOrangeGuy09 said:
I thought of it, but given that the verse is dead along with supporters/knowledgeable people for about like two years, there really isn't much point to it imo.

It would also take lots of time and work, so even if rework is to be done, I think deleting the verse and then re-introducing it in a better state would be a better option, as was done with several other verses.
Click to expand...
 
TheOrangeGuy09 said:
Well that guy just added abilities to one character, while I’d need to revamp the entire verse with all haxes, abilities, calcs, etc., which would take too much time and effort, all while having zero other supporters and CRTs/calcs taking very long to get accepted (it takes long to even nuke this verse, now imagine for every CRT and calc).

Even if I want to do that in the future, it’s better to delete it first and then re-introduce as I said here:
Click to expand...
I meant that you could use some of your CSAP profiles of those characters with arguments from that CRT, but even if that would take way too much work - I don't mind if you delete that verse for now
 
Just thought it would be much easier to revamp some profiles, when you already have your versions of them lying around
 
AppleMaker said:
I'd say I'm neutral about it, since you know, you can just make a CRT like this, where you use your csap versions of their profiles and explain why they are better. But those who weren't scaled currently could be deleted from the verse page
Click to expand...

We arent supposed to just copy profiles from other sites. That is infact agasint the rules.

"Please refrain from creating content revision threads that consist solely of links to off-site sources (such as YouTube, Reddit, other VS forums, etc.) and have no discernible arguments of their own."

As well as it is basically just seen as plagiarism by the wiki. No we cant just copy over a csap profile.
 
Ebihara said:
We arent supposed to just copy profiles from other sites. That is infact agasint the rules.

"Please refrain from creating content revision threads that consist solely of links to off-site sources (such as YouTube, Reddit, other VS forums, etc.) and have no discernible arguments of their own."

As well as it is basically just seen as plagiarism by the wiki. No we cant just copy over a csap profile.
Click to expand...
Oh damn... Didn't knew about that. Alr, you can nuke that verse
 
Ebihara said:
We arent supposed to just copy profiles from other sites. That is infact agasint the rules.

"Please refrain from creating content revision threads that consist solely of links to off-site sources (such as YouTube, Reddit, other VS forums, etc.) and have no discernible arguments of their own."

As well as it is basically just seen as plagiarism by the wiki. No we cant just copy over a csap profile.
Click to expand...
I think he moreso argued that I already have lots of scans and arguments in hands, so it would be easier to rework the verse.

Which is true, but still lots of time and effort with lots of cons tbh.
 
Agreed.

Star's page still has the "New Mewberty"label for her super form, which was never the name for her form.

It's a shame because her profile could be very cool if given lots of love, she has a huge ton of hax and such, but yeah, just delete them.
 
RiloKileyFan said:
Star's page still has the "New Mewberty"label for her super form, which was never the name for her form.
Click to expand...
What is even funnier is the fact that it has "New Mewberty" only for images lmao, her second key is just called "Mewberty" and is a blend of both Mewberty and Ultimate Magic Form for some reason, as I said in the OP somewhere. The profile directly contradicts itself and confuses the two.

RiloKileyFan said:
It's a shame because her profile could be very cool if given lots of love, she has a huge ton of hax and such, but yeah, just delete them.
Click to expand...
Wholeheartedly agreed.
 
TheOrangeGuy09 said:
What is even funnier is the fact that it has "New Mewberty" only for images lmao, her second key is just called "Mewberty" and is a blend of both Mewberty and Ultimate Magic Form for some reason, as I said in the OP somewhere. The profile directly contradicts itself and confuses the two.


Wholeheartedly agreed.
Click to expand...
Yeah... and when her death battle episode came out, a lot of people would refer to that form as "New Mewberty" because of that error, it was frustrating and I believe in that 2021 CRT I asked to change it several times, but nobody ever did.

Maybe a future person with lots of nostalgia and love for SVTFOE will resurrect her and her verse. My hats off to whoever attempts it, if someone ever does.
 
RiloKileyFan said:
Yeah... and when her death battle episode came out, a lot of people would refer to that form as "New Mewberty" because of that error, it was frustrating and I believe in that 2021 CRT I asked to change it several times, but nobody ever did.
Click to expand...
Oh-hoh, NOW I remember you!

And yeah this is annoying as hell. When reading through the thread I got the impression that both sides really only wanted to nuke/save Tier 2 (despite the title ironically saying "let's finally fix Star Butterfly"), so that may explain why nobody really cared about you pointing this out several times, but oh well.
 
I don't mind the verse being deleted given the state of it and if no one's gonna work on it reasonably for a while then there's no need to keep it around at the moment.
 
Welp, since I got three staff approvals and all pages are now deleted, I can call this thread a success. This can be closed. Thank you everyone who gave their opinions here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

ElJoaki5
  • Locked
Berserk: I am The Idea of Evil, The Desired God (Rework)
Replies
11
Views
805
Re5yh
Re5yh
Voidnether
  • Locked
Honkai: Star Rail — Regarding the Aeons
Replies
24
Views
2K
TWILIGHT-OP
TWILIGHT-OP
Phsccarvalho
  • Locked
Star Wars: Are blasters lightspeed in canon?
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
Dalesean027
Dalesean027
Hagane_no_Saiyajin
  • Locked
Why having "Star Wars" and "Star Wars (Legends)" does not work
Replies
2
Views
1K
Qawsedf234
Qawsedf234
Mbpoops
  • Locked
quick hsr crt: in verse additions
Replies
36
Views
2K
Mbpoops
Mbpoops
Back
Top