Downgrade Attack Potency Reality Quest

[BlackCat]

Hmm... where should I start? Alright, let’s begin here.
In this calculation for Choi Sun-Jae, the result came out to 237,186,184.57956 Joules (9-A)

However, the destructive value for Reinforced Concrete violent fragmentation has now been revised to 26–41.4 J/cc.

So I believe this calculation should also be adjusted accordingly,

using 26–41.4 J/cc (with an average of 33.7 J/cc)

I will use the same volume from the previous calculation =3,875,591.2513

3,875,591.2513*33.7
= 130,607,425.169 Joules or 0.0312159238 Tons of tnt (9-A) [ACCEPT]

• This is my calculation blog

I hope this revision will be accepted successfully

Agree: @Viott, @Mr. Bambu, @FinePoint

Disagree:

 

[Voidnether]

Imo, make a new blog to recalculate it with all these then try to get a CGM to evaluate it and make a CRT after cause I don't think calc group discussion is the place for that but someone could correct me if I'm wrong

 

[BlackCat]

Imo, make a new blog to recalculate it with all these then try to get a CGM to evaluate it and make a CRT after cause I don't think calc group discussion is the place for that but someone could correct me if I'm wrong

In my opinion, if we create a calculation blog first and then make the thread, I think it would take two steps.

But if we create the thread and do it there instead, I think it would be easier, because in the end, there’s not much to change we just need to adjust the multiplier that has been lowered.

However, if making a calculation blog is really necessary, I’ll create it later.

 

[Viott]

I agree.

 

[Zefra3011]

In my opinion, if we create a calculation blog first and then make the thread, I think it would take two steps.

But if we create the thread and do it there instead, I think it would be easier, because in the end, there’s not much to change we just need to adjust the multiplier that has been lowered.

However, if making a calculation blog is really necessary, I’ll create it later.

It's the standard procedure tho, even for very small changes like this one.

 

[BlackCat]

It's the standard procedure tho, even for very small changes like this one.

So in the end, should I create a calculation blog? Or can I use this thread to perform the downgrade this time?

 

[Viott]

So in the end, should I create a calculation blog? Or can I use this thread to perform the downgrade this time?

Create a new blog.

 

[BlackCat]

Create a new blog.

Okay, I understand. I’ll create a new calculation blog tomorrow.

By the way, if the calculation gets accepted, can I still use this thread to continue with the downgrade (if I update the explanation)

 

[Zefra3011]

Okay, I understand. I’ll create a new calculation blog tomorrow.

By the way, if the calculation gets accepted, can I still use this thread to continue with the downgrade (if I update the explanation)

yeah, just add it in the OP

 

[Mr. Bambu]

The calc needs to be adjusted to reflect the value. This can either be a revision of the existing calc, or a new calc, but it does need to be somewhere. In premise, I agree.

 

[FinePoint]

Same as Bambu.