Higher Dimensions vs Lower Dimensions hax physiology

[Sniper670]

Aca 5, TD2, NEP2 and stuff of similar nature

Does being higher dimensional make one ignore such physiologies? Say the one who possesses these is a 3D being, but he's fighting a 6D being. Can the 6D being affect the 3D being regardless?

 

[Cat275]

Nah the higher dim needs some kind of negation to this or feat maybe even have it itself.

 

[StekFence]

Aca 5, TD2, NEP2 and stuff of similar nature

Does being higher dimensional make one ignore such physiologies? Say the one who possesses these is a 3D being, but he's fighting a 6D being. Can the 6D being affect the 3D being regardless?

Nope, still needs the required stuff. The reason why is that being much bigger then someone doesnt let you magically hit someone who doesn’t exist.

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

Not unless they destroy the entire 3-dimensional construct.

 

[Vietthai96]

No, without feat or statement they can't

 

[Sniper670]

Not even tier 0?

That's hard

 

[StekFence]

I mean, yeah. U can’t really bypass the other guy being a soul by punching harder. Even if u are the literally strongest striker in fiction

 

[Vietthai96]

that why tier 2 haxlords like Anos can incon a lot of tier 1

DontTalk did created a revision about if character A see character B as fiction then all of B's abilities will be useless, but that kinda bad because it will benefit verse that use reality > fiction difference for their cosmology hierarchy. Also DontTalk lost interest in that thread

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

DontTalk did created a revision about if character A see character B as fiction then all of B's abilities will be useless, but that kinda bad because it will benefit verse that use reality > fiction difference for their cosmology hierarchy. Also DontTalk lost interest in that thread

Lower-dimensional beings already can’t affect higher-dimensional beings unless they’re a smurf.

 

[Vietthai96]

Lower-dimensional beings already can’t affect higher-dimensional beings unless they’re a smurf.

well it is more complicated that just being smurf, iirc, the thread is about. Character A see Character B as fiction, so even if B have things like NEP, AE, etc....but because B is just fiction to A, thus all the abilities like AE, NEP, etc....is also just a fiction to A, thus A can do anything to B despite having no feat or statement of being able to do so, because to A, all those things is just fiction, A can do everything A want

 

[Cat275]

well it is more complicated that just being smurf, iirc, the thread is about. Character A see Character B as fiction, so even if B have things like NEP, AE, etc....but because B is just fiction to A, thus all the abilities like AE, NEP, etc....is also just a fiction to A, thus A can do anything to B despite having no feat or statement of being able to do so, because to A, all those things is just fiction, A can do everything A want

Thread link?

 

[Vietthai96]

Thread link?

i don't remember, it is like 1 year ago, i only remember some detail of the thread

 

[AKUTO123]

Lower-dimensional beings already can’t affect higher-dimensional beings unless they’re a smurf.

However, this situation changes in some abilities. The point of DT's post is f>r, it's very likely that exception capabilities don't work either.

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

well it is more complicated that just being smurf, iirc, the thread is about. Character A see Character B as fiction, so even if B have things like NEP, AE, etc....but because B is just fiction to A, thus all the abilities like AE, NEP, etc....is also just a fiction to A, thus A can do anything to B despite having no feat or statement of being able to do so, because to A, all those things is just fiction, A can do everything A want

A wouldn’t be able to affect B directly, but can still indirectly affect them through manipulating the dimensional construct. The OP gave the example of 6D fighting a 3D, so we’ll say Character A is 6D while Character B is 3D. A can’t simply punch B and be done with it, but he could for instance destroy the 6D construct, and by that effect, it would kill B.

 

[Vietthai96]

A wouldn’t be able to affect B directly, but can still indirectly affect them through manipulating the dimensional construct. The OP gave the example of 6D fighting a 3D, so we’ll say Character A is 6D while Character B is 3D. A can’t simply punch B and be done with it, but he could for instance destroy the 6D construct, and by that effect, it would kill B.

i know, but the point of DT thread is about, if A see B as fiction, mean abilities like NEP, AE is also just a fiction to A, which mean it is nothing, and A can directly do whatever A want with B, because to A, NEP or AE, etc.. of B, is just fiction

 

[ShadowWarrior1999]

i know, but the point of DT thread is about, if A see B as fiction, mean abilities like NEP, AE is also just a fiction to A, which mean it is nothing, and A can directly do whatever A want with B, because to A, NEP or AE, etc.. of B, is just fiction

If by this he means giving A abilities they have never demonstrated, then no I don’t agree with it.

 

[Vietthai96]

If by this he means giving A abilities they have never demonstrated, then no I don’t agree with it.

well, he already ignored it, yeah, also i like said it only benefit verse that have reality > fiction cosmology, which kinda unbalanced