• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Honkai Impact | Major Downgrade From Low 1-A

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
470
Reaction score
307
The Honkai verse (including Yog-Sothoth's Outer God key from GGZ) got downgraded from 1-A to Low 1-A recently, and I plan to get the profiles downgraded even further (to 12D or 11D for now). The justifications for Low 1-A can be found here, although the R>F statements are no longer taken as valid, only being interpreted as analogical descriptions of higher-dimensional superiority instead. Anyways, it’s probably best to get the biggest “evidence” for Low 1-A out of the way from the get-go: absolute infinity in Honkai. As the argument goes, Low 1-A is the Von Neumann universe, absolute infinity scales to or above the Von Neumann universe, and False God Otto scales to absolute infinity. Therefore, everyone who scales to or above False God Otto scales to Low 1-A. [EDIT: My argument doesn't necessarily rely on surpassing Otto himself, but quantitatively surpassing absolute infinities in general. Flamescion Kiana destroyed Otto's imaginary space, and Kalpas had the power to destroy an imaginary space, imaginary spaces being said to be absolutely infinite. Yet, the power of Flamescion Kiana and Kalpas, respectively, are both quantitatively surpassed. Even if you assert that nobody scales above Otto himself, there are still cases where people quantitatively surpass so-called "absolutely infinite" levels of power.] Simple, right? Not so fast. The whole point of “absolute infinity” is to be the pinnacle of all quantities, standing above any other quantity. The issue here is that many characters in Honkai such as Kiana, Kevin and Elysia have quantitatively exceeded this level of power ("slightly" exceeding someone's non-qualitative power is absolutely quantitative, and qualitative superiority in Honkai has already been rejected anyways). That’s obviously self-defeating and entirely disproves the notion that False God Otto actually had absolute infinite power. If there is an absolute infinite, it must by definition stand above all other quantities entirely. If something were to quantitatively exceed the absolute infinite, that just proves that it wasn’t actually absolutely infinite to begin with.

Another thing of note is that Otto’s claims about his power being absolutely infinite aren’t even particularly credible to begin with. As pointed out in his profile, he claimed to have transcended Herrschers, becoming a god even in comparison to them. Yet, the Herrschers were obviously able to defeat him, matching and even exceeding his power. My point here is that he’s full of shit and we shouldn’t scale Honkai to low outer based off of one statement he made that’s contradicted within the verse anyways or based off of a statement that doesn't even say that Otto's power is absolutely infinite in the first place, just a "sign" of the absolute infinite, whatever that means.

[on top of this, I've already discussed this topic with Ultima on discord and he agrees with this downgrade, so he might be able to provide further arguments about "absolute infinity" and why it isn't even a coherent quantitative concept in the first place]


Now that that's out of the way, let's examine the other justifications given for Honkai's Low 1-A scaling. It has been pointed out that in the Honkai series, it is mentioned that in terms of transfinite numbers, the Honkai on Earth is "around the lowest cardinal number and far from seeing the Imaginary Tree that's also infinite in scale in a transfinite sense." The scaling that has been derived from this is the idea that the Imaginary Tree scales to "transfinite layers of transcendence," and is thus High 1-B or even Low 1-A. However, this scan doesn't say any of that. All that it says is that the Imaginary Tree as a whole is on a higher level of infinity than the Earth, and that's just Low 2-C. There is no mention of the Imaginary tree supposedly being an infinite number of transfinite levels above Earth, nor is there any mention of any higher transfinite hierarchies that the Imaginary Tree scales to at all.

And here’s one of the other main justifications: Project Stigma. It’s claimed that scans about Project Stigma prove that there’s an infinite hierarchy of layered stories in the Honkai cosmology, each transcending the last. But this simply isn’t the case, and it’s clear to anyone who puts their biases aside and actually reads the text. Narratives are described as conceptual things that shape the world. Project Stigma is a narrative meant to control all other narratives. But that’s about it. There are a few mentions of fiction, but the essential elements of an upwards R>F-like hierarchy are never shown here. There is mention of humans creating civilization from fiction, but there is no mention of things viewing baseline reality as fiction, transcending it as something that is more real. In fact, many of these narratives simply exist parallel to each other, with the only major quantitative difference being their complexity (unless you really want to argue that the implication is that there’s a higher dimensional difference between a resort hotel and a cave dwelling in Honkai). Even Project Stigma was only meant to “govern” all other stories rather than dimensionally transcend them. At best, you can make a 2-layered downward R>F hierarchy here: baseline reality and fiction below it. But that obviously doesn’t scale anywhere.

So what do we make of this? Well, the only valid scaling left that we have here is to 12D. Or 11D? But yeah, no Low 1-A or even High 1-B.

Agree: DarkDragonMedeus, Ultima_Reality, Reiner04, Elizhaa
Disagree:
Neutral:
 
Last edited:
Ever heard of spacing too many long paragraphs.

Agree with op
Wdym? None of the sections are very long. All the major ideas are separated and spaced out: Absolute infinite scaling is contradicted within the verse -> There are no credible sources supporting absolute infinite scaling -> I talked about this with Ultima ---> "Transfinite layers" scaling is unfounded -> Project Stigma scaling goes nowhere -> Closing sentence.

Unless you worded your comment a bit weirdly?
 
Wdym? None of the sections are very long. All the major ideas are separated and spaced out: Absolute infinite scaling is contradicted within the verse -> There are no credible sources supporting absolute infinite scaling -> I talked about this with Ultima ---> "Transfinite layers" scaling is unfounded -> Project Stigma scaling goes nowhere -> Closing sentence.

Unless you worded your comment a bit weirdly?
Relax, he just means the proposal has too many long paragraphs. He's not talking about arguements or scans.
 
I have a few things to say later, but I'm very busy today, so my reply will take a while.
 
Anyways, it’s probably best to get the biggest “evidence” for Low 1-A out of the way from the get-go: absolute infinity in Honkai. As the argument goes, Low 1-A is the Von Neumann universe, absolute infinity scales to or above the Von Neumann universe, and False God Otto scales to absolute infinity. Therefore, everyone who scales to or above False God Otto scales to Low 1-A. Simple, right? Not so fast. The whole point of “absolute infinity” is to be the pinnacle of all quantities, standing above any other quantity. The issue here is that many characters in Honkai such as Kiana, Kevin and Elysia have quantitatively exceeded this level of power ("slightly" exceeding someone's non-qualitative power is absolutely quantitative, and qualitative superiority in Honkai has already been rejected anyways). That’s obviously self-defeating and entirely disproves the notion that False God Otto actually had absolute infinite power. If there is an absolute infinite, it must by definition stand above all other quantities entirely. If something were to quantitatively exceed the absolute infinite, that just proves that it wasn’t actually absolutely infinite to begin with.

Another thing of note is that Otto’s claims about his power being absolutely infinite aren’t even particularly credible to begin with. As pointed out in his profile, he claimed to have transcended Herrschers, becoming a god even in comparison to them. Yet, the Herrschers were obviously able to defeat him, matching and even exceeding his power. My point here is that he’s full of shit and we shouldn’t scale Honkai to low outer based off of one statement he made that’s contradicted within the verse anyways or based off of a statement that doesn't even say that Otto's power is absolutely infinite in the first place, just a "sign" of the absolute infinite, whatever that means.

I'll address this directly because that's where I have the most problems, from my understanding, the OP is arguing that we can't have “scaling-chain” at Low 1-A, since Low 1-A is the peak of all quantities, someone being stronger than that (without being qualitative, that is 1-A) would be contradictory.

To begin with, OP didn't cite any standard either in the FAQ or on the Tiering system page that supports his argument, and we actually recognize that there are quantitative structures that can be bigger than others in Low 1-A even if they are in the same tier.

To quote our standards from the Tiering system page:

“Likewise, even the Von Neumann Universe (As well as larger structures still) is still simply the union of many elements that, individually, are smaller than itself. And the same applies to any mathematical space whatsoever.”

Following our standards… for example, the tier High 3-A, which has Infinite 3-D energy, we acknowledge that it is possible to be infinitely stronger than High 3-A while still being High 3-A, or take the tier 2-A, which is an infinite amount of 4-D structures, normally one could argue that if someone can’t be stronger than 2-A while being 4-D, but no, we still allow someone to be stronger than someone else in 2-A despite it already being infinite x infinite 4D via scaling chain. What I want to get with this is that, both High 3-A and 2-A are already the peak of their respective tier, yet we still allow someone to be stronger than said “peak” even infinitely times so without having to go into a higher tier. The same applies here, so uhmn, this isn’t really based on anything.

Apart from that, Otto and co never really surpassed the Imaginary Tree, Otto’s power was just equal to it at best, his statement about transcending Herrschers isn’t really contradictory, we have Herrschers at 3-C and High 1-C here, he gaining a higher power in a way that him physically stronger than most of Herrschers would allow him to “transcend” them, no contradictions here.

OP is also arguing that the infinity statements weren’t applied to Otto, now, this is pretty easy to counter as he is empowered to this level by the Tree, his church which is said to be the Absolute Infinity is just his power, Otto also reaffirms this here, Otto’s statements about it are backed by other characters saying the same. You can’t really claim that Otto was high, when other characters, media and narration states the same as him.

If you want to nitpick the “sign” in the statement, the original CN text of the book, directly states that it means/signifies the absolute infinity. This ignoring how Otto states the same directly in the game.

虚数空间·伪神教堂

当男人取得了“神”的权柄时,周遭的空间似乎都发生了异变。
这里是虚数空间的某一个领域,意味着绝对的无限

This is one of the realms of Imaginary Space, which means/signifies absolute infinity.

Now that that's out of the way, let's examine the other justifications given for Honkai's Low 1-A scaling. It has been pointed out that in the Honkai series, it is mentioned that in terms of transfinite numbers, the Honkai on Earth is "around the lowest cardinal number and far from seeing the Imaginary Tree that's also infinite in scale in a transfinite sense." The scaling that has been derived from this is the idea that the Imaginary Tree scales to "transfinite layers of transcendence," and is thus High 1-B or even Low 1-A. However, this scan doesn't say any of that. All that it says is that the Imaginary Tree as a whole is on a higher level of infinity than the Earth, and that's just Low 2-C. There is no mention of the Imaginary tree supposedly being an infinite number of transfinite levels above Earth, nor is there any mention of any higher transfinite hierarchies that the Imaginary Tree scales to at all.

Umn, no. The transfinite scan is being used to support the Low 1-A rating, not as a sole reason, after all, Set Theory exists in the verse and the Imaginary Tree being infinite even in a transfinite sense is to just extra consistency to it being the Absolute infinity. After all, the AI is just that. “However, this scan doesn't say any of that” I ask you to read again the second scan in the album, after the comma, it is literally 1 to 1 the text copied from the scan to the justifications.
 
Last edited:
I'll address this directly because that's where I have the most problems, from my understanding, the OP is arguing that we can't have “scaling-chain” at Low 1-A, since Low 1-A is the peak of all quantities, someone being stronger than that (without being qualitative, that is 1-A) would be contradictory.
That's not my issue with it. Hierarchies within Low 1-A should be fine. The real issue is when you bring up hierarchies within "absolute infinity" specifically. "Absolute infinity" by definition means "a number that is bigger than any other conceivable or inconceivable quantity, either finite or transfinite" as per the article you yourself cited. Absolute infinity does not have any hierarchies that surpass it nor can it have hierarchies that surpass it; otherwise, it would not actually be bigger than any other conceivable or inconceivable quantity and thus not be absolute infinity by definition.
Apart from that, Otto and co never really surpassed the Imaginary Tree, Otto’s power was just equal to it at best
That doesn't matter. I never claimed he surpassed the Tree, so stop strawmanning my argument. The point is that Otto presumably scaled to an absolute infinite quantity whether or not that absolute infinite quantity matched the Tree or not, and then the Herrschers surpassed THAT. The issue is that it is contradictory nonsense to quantitatively surpass an absolute infinite quantity whatsoever.
his statement about transcending Herrschers isn’t really contradictory, we have Herrschers at 3-C and High 1-C here, he gaining a higher power in a way that him physically stronger than most of Herrschers would allow him to “transcend” them, no contradictions here.
That's just cope. He didn't say "I transcend most Herrschers," he straight up just said "I transcend Herrscher" totally and that he would "become a god" compared to the category of Herrscher itself. And of course, that was not true. You have to use headcanon to bend his statements if you want to defend his credibility.
If you want to nitpick the “sign” in the statement, the original CN text of the book, directly states that it means/signifies the absolute infinity.
Fine, I'll give you that. My point still stands that this statement is contradicted within the verse, and can therefore be discarded.
I ask you to read again the second scan in the album, after the comma, it is literally 1 to 1 the text copied from the scan to the justifications.
"Even if we exhaust the Honkai on Earth, we're still wandering around the lowest cardinal number and far from seeing the Imaginary Tree that's also infinite in scale in a transfinite sense."

That's literally just 2-C. It's transfinite but bigger than the lowest cardinal number.
 
Last edited:
That's just cope. He didn't say "I transcend most Herrschers," he straight up just said "I transcend Herrscher" totally and that he would "become a god" compared to the category of Herrscher itself. And of course, that was not true. You have to use headcanon to bend his statements if you want to defend his credibility.
you say that while claiming Elysia is stronger than him , and then you say we have to use headcannon, while only headcannon here is that supposedly Elysia and other herrschers are stronger than him, in reality hes only ever been compared to previous era herrscher of finality, who is mind you far superior than every other herrscher as they are nothing but her shadow (supported by kevin himself) including elysia the herrscher of origin, with sole exception being Deliverance Kevin who already had to shoulder part of finality to even be able to surpass her.
Fine, I'll give you that. My point still stands that this statement is contradicted within the verse, and can therefore be discarded.

"Even if we exhaust the Honkai on Earth, we're still wandering around the lowest cardinal number and far from seeing the Imaginary Tree that's also infinite in scale in a transfinite sense."

That's literally just 2-C. It's transfinite but bigger than the lowest cardinal number.
How is that 2-C, where does it remotely say that being lowest in the cardinal whatver shit that scan is 2-C? where do you see more universes?"
Now for Low 1-A slop, personally dont care but if Low 1-A as an entire tier cannot have the characters stronger than another then the entire tier itself is pointless icl.
Also wasnt just "Absolute Infinity" the baseline in low 1-A?
Also you only brought up absolute infinity part for low 1-A (from garrixian crt you linked), but if we only used that we would have "Possibly Low 1-A" which even Ultima suggested So you have to downgrade other slop to even tackle with low 1-A
Edit: removed the IT slop mentioned as i didnt understand last argument well, it just talks about that transfinity slop part not the entire cosmo . MB
 
Last edited:
you say that while claiming Elysia is stronger than him , and then you say we have to use headcannon, while only headcannon here is that supposedly Elysia and other herrschers are stronger than him, in reality hes only ever been compared to previous era herrscher of finality, who is mind you far superior than every other herrscher as they are nothing but her shadow (supported by kevin himself) including elysia the herrscher of origin, with sole exception being Deliverance Kevin who already had to shoulder part of finality to even be able to surpass her.
My argument doesn't necessarily rely on scaling to Otto himself. Really, it applies to any supposedly absolutely infinite quantity in Honkai in general being surpassed. For example, Kiana was able to destroy Otto's "absolutely infinite" space with her Flamescion key, which would make the power of that key absolutely infinite. However, Kiana quantitatively surpasses the power of that key, and so do other characters in that verse. Thus, we have so-called "absolute infinity" being quantitatively surpassed. Kalpas was also able to destroy an "absolutely infinite" space, and thus his power would also be "absolutely infinite." Yet his power level was also quantitatively surpassed. Again, we have so-called "absolute infinity" being quantitatively surpassed. There is still a problem here even if you don't scale anyone above Otto.
How is that 2-C
I'm not saying that it's actually 2-C. My point was that that scan alone doesn't prove anything above 2-C. Considering all the dimensional scaling, it would still only be High 1-C or 1-B at best, not Low 1-A
Now for Low 1-A slop, personally dont care but if Low 1-A as an entire tier cannot have the characters stronger than another then the entire tier itself is pointless icl.
Also wasnt just "Absolute Infinity" the baseline in low 1-A?
No. Absolute infinity is not "baseline low 1-A". That guy is just wrong. "Baseline" implies something can surpass it, but at that point it's no longer absolute infinity by definition.

And neither do all Low 1-A characters scale to "absolute infinity." That's just not a thing. Since you're referring to ultima (i think you posted the wrong link), Ultima currently doesn't even believe absolute infinity is a coherent quantitative concept at all due to the Burali-Forti paradox fwiw (sorry if anyone doesn't want that message shared for some reason).
 
the Herrschers surpassed THAT.
Yet, the Herrschers were obviously able to defeat him, matching and even exceeding his power.
Where is the proof for this? Sorry if I was mistaken but as far as I remember, Kiana defeated Otto with Void power by reversing the link of imaginary tree to Otto?
The whole thing is exactly what Otto wanted. He was defeated because he wanted to get defeated is it not? Are there any other statements of cases of other herrschers surpassing false god otto explictly?
 
My argument doesn't necessarily rely on scaling to Otto himself. Really, it applies to any supposedly absolutely infinite quantity in Honkai in general being surpassed. For example, Kiana was able to destroy Otto's "absolutely infinite" space with her Flamescion key, which would make the power of that key absolutely infinite. However, Kiana quantitatively surpasses the power of that key, and so do other characters in that verse. Thus, we have so-called "absolute infinity" being quantitatively surpassed. Kalpas was also able to destroy an "absolutely infinite" space, and thus his power would also be "absolutely infinite." Yet his power level was also quantitatively surpassed. Again, we have so-called "absolute infinity" being quantitatively surpassed. There is still a problem here even if you don't scale anyone above Otto.
Kalpas scales to supposed Imaginary Space, Otto downscales from Imaginary Tree thats the difference, so theres no absolute infinity being surpassed by them. only by Kiana and Deliverance Kevin anyway idc abt low 1-A so yall can beat each other to it, im just saying you shouldnt tell us we use headcannon while blindly claiming shit like Elysia>Otto or Kalpas>Absolute infinity. Thats all
I'm not saying that it's actually 2-C. My point was that that scan alone doesn't prove anything above 2-C. Considering all the dimensional scaling, it would still only be High 1-C or 1-B at best, not Low 1-A.
i realised that, thats why i edited my post

No. Absolute infinity is not "baseline low 1-A". That guy is just wrong. "Baseline" implies something can surpass it, but at that point it's no longer absolute infinity by definition.

And neither do all Low 1-A characters scale to "absolute infinity." That's just not a thing. Since you're referring to ultima (i think you posted the wrong link), Ultima currently doesn't even believe absolute infinity is a coherent quantitative concept at all due to the Burali-Forti paradox fwiw (sorry if anyone doesn't want that message shared for some reason).
Well thats just not my problem that he made this a standard before realising its ass so he should just outright nuke it next time.
tho id jut suggest Kiana and IT being low 1-A, otto only took a power from it to be low 1-A in the first place, and bro was just a "slave to it" explaining his inferiority to the tree. while Cocoon Kiana is the strongest being surpassing everyone but the Tree.
 
Where is the proof for this? Sorry if I was mistaken but as far as I remember, Kiana defeated Otto with Void power by reversing the link of imaginary tree to Otto?
The whole thing is exactly what Otto wanted. He was defeated because he wanted to get defeated is it not? Are there any other statements of cases of other herrschers surpassing false god otto explictly?
No, only deliverance kevin and cocoon kiana outright surpass him, tho sounds stupid but "slightly" exceeding absolute infinty sounds weird as an "anti-feat" they are just not surpassing him by infinite ammounts of strenght which would automatically nuke the purpose of the absolute infinity itself.
Thats why mfs who are high 3-A that can beat another high 3-A still high 3-A, but ofc this is science fantasy bullshit theory which just proves how tier 1 after high 1-B becomes stupid AF.
not to mention that being (far) stronger than someone doesnt automatically grant you another tier higher or anything sort of that, it could also be a plot thing which happens here.
 
Where is the proof for this? Sorry if I was mistaken but as far as I remember, Kiana defeated Otto with Void power by reversing the link of imaginary tree to Otto?
The whole thing is exactly what Otto wanted. He was defeated because he wanted to get defeated is it not? Are there any other statements of cases of other herrschers surpassing false god otto explictly?
I've already said that my argument doesn't necessarily rely on scaling above Otto himself. Regardless of whether "Otto wanted" it to happen, Flamescion Kiana destroying Otto's "absolutely infinite" imaginary space and Kalpas destroying an "absolutely infinite" imaginary space would both require absolutely infinite power. Yet, both of them respectively have their power quantitatively surpassed. And there's the contradiction. Do you see what I mean?
 
so theres no absolute infinity being surpassed by them. only by Kiana and Deliverance Kevin
"Absolute infinity" being surpassed by ANYONE at all, even if only by two people, still disproves the idea that it was ever "absolute infinity" in the first place.
Woomica said:
tho sounds stupid but "slightly" exceeding absolute infinty sounds weird as an "anti-feat" they are just not surpassing him by infinite ammounts of strenght which would automatically nuke the purpose of the absolute infinity itself.
It absolutely is an antifeat. If we actually use the definition of absolute infinity, then absolute infinity CANNOT be surpassed AT ALL. Otherwise, it is not absolute infinity.

If we don't use the actual definition, then using "absolute infinity" for scaling is meaningless since there is no other definition for what "absolute infinity" is.
 
I've already said that my argument doesn't necessarily rely on scaling above Otto himself. Regardless of whether "Otto wanted" it to happen, Flamescion Kiana destroying Otto's "absolutely infinite" imaginary space and Kalpas destroying an "absolutely infinite" imaginary space would both require absolutely infinite power. Yet, both of them respectively have their power quantitatively surpassed. And there's the contradiction. Do you see what I mean?
I think you are getting the timeline wrong here.
Kiana didn't destory the imaginary space. She reversed the link of imaginary tree to otto, then defeated him while he is in finite state. He can be defeated in finite state so he lost. Thus, his false god power vanished. As his false god power which is supporting the realm vanished, the realm too vanished. So there's no contradiction here.

Elysia imaginary space is not powered by imaginary tree with absolute infinity power. I think that's why kalpas is able to destroy it. I'm not sure about this part. We can just assign absolute infinity to Otto's imaginary space only and chain scale from it and remove the justification from kalpas
 
I think you are getting the timeline wrong here.
Kiana didn't destory the imaginary space. She reversed the link of imaginary tree to otto, then defeated him while he is in finite state. He can be defeated in finite state so he lost. Thus, his false god power vanished. As his false god power which is supporting the realm vanished, the realm too vanished. So there's no contradiction here.

Elysia imaginary space is not powered by imaginary tree with absolute infinity power. I think that's why kalpas is able to destroy it. I'm not sure about this part. We can just assign absolute infinity to Otto's imaginary space only and chain scale from it and remove the justification from kalpas
Well otto still gets surpassed by Kiana and Kevin so even then low 1-A gets gone so ig the only actual low 1-A would either be CoF kiana or just Imaginary tree.
 
Kiana didn't destory the imaginary space
Yeah she did. It's literally in the profiles, i don't know how you can just miss that.
Elysia imaginary space is not powered by imaginary tree with absolute infinity power. I think that's why kalpas is able to destroy it. I'm not sure about this part. We can just assign absolute infinity to Otto's imaginary space only and chain scale from it and remove the justification from kalpas
According to both this wiki's profiles and the translation of the book given above, imaginary spaces in general are straight up stated to be absolute infinity. "This is one of the realms of Imaginary Space, which means/signifies absolute infinity." Saying that the imaginary space that Kalpas destroyed isn't actually absolutely infinite just sounds like ad hoc special pleading solely made to defend this extremely inconsistent scaling.
 
Well otto still gets surpassed by Kiana and Kevin so even then low 1-A gets gone so ig the only actual low 1-A would either be CoF kiana or just Imaginary tree.
The absolute infinity statements were only ever made about Otto's imaginary space and imaginary spaces in general. And we know those are obviously BS since the power of those spaces/the power to destroy those spaces gets surpassed anyways. I know that you regard Otto's low 1-A scaling as invalid, but in doing so you also invalidate CoF Kiana and the Imaginary Tree's Low 1-A scaling as well since they just upscale from Otto's statements. There's no support for CoF Kiana or the Imaginary Tree being low 1-A since the only two "absolute infinity" statements that exist in Hoyoverse are BS.
 
Yeah she did. It's literally in the profiles, i don't know how you can just miss that.
Durandal talking about "Destroying Imaginary" is overly simplified. Kiana corrected this by saying durandal is talking about using void power to change infinite to finite.
I am not the one who made the profiles. I'm just saying how I understand this. As far as I understand, Kiana didn't destroyed the imaginary space. The space vanished becuz of Otto losing false god power. But anyway Kiana Low 1-A is still valid at CoF form.
According to both this wiki's profiles and the translation of the book given above, imaginary spaces in general are straight up stated to be absolute infinity. "This is one of the realms of Imaginary Space, which means/signifies absolute infinity." Saying that the imaginary space that Kalpas destroyed isn't actually absolutely infinite just sounds like ad hoc special pleading solely made to defend this extremely inconsistent scaling.
The book translation is a bit misleading I would say. I think the intention is to say Imaginary tree absolute infinity power are in this imaginary space which is supported by Otto saying how he is infinite in this space because he has been graced by the tree. Meaning only the spaces graced the tree with absolute infinity will have low 1-A rating.

We can keep low 1-A scaling to CoF kiana, Kevin deliverence and others who scale to them and imaginary tree on equal term.
 
Oh my god.

Bro, you are arguing solely on belief because "nothing can surpass absolute infinity" phrase while its tiering is taken to be Low 1-A. So what, if a character with 1-A were to appear in the cosmology, ie 'Aha' because they climbed to the highest branch of the Imaginary Tree, were you going to disagree due to the same reason, that it's "absolute infinity" so it should be unreachable or unable to be transcended?

Then why the hell, based on your beliefs again, it's not tier 0? XD
 
Durandal talking about "Destroying Imaginary" is overly simplified. Kiana corrected this by saying durandal is talking about using void power to change infinite to finite.
I am not the one who made the profiles. I'm just saying how I understand this. As far as I understand, Kiana didn't destroyed the imaginary space. The space vanished becuz of Otto losing false god power.
Even before coming up with that idea, Flamescion Kiana was still able to severely harm and keep up with False God Otto whos power is supposed to be "absolutely infinite" as pointed out in the profiles, thus making her scale to "absolute infinity" as well which is problematic for the reasons I outlined (this level of power got quantitatively surpassed)
The book translation is a bit misleading I would say. I think the intention is to say Imaginary tree absolute infinity power are in this imaginary space which is supported by Otto saying how he is infinite in this space because he has been graced by the tree. Meaning only the spaces graced the tree with absolute infinity will have low 1-A rating.
Except none of those stipulations are said by the book at all. It just straight up says that being an imaginary space "means absolute infinity," not that "being an imaginary space that has been graced by the Tree means absolute infinity." Otto saying that doesn't support it either. Him saying the space was supported by the tree doesn't get rid of the fact that imaginary spaces in general are still absolute infinity. You're just making a headcanon distinction that directly goes against the text to justify this inconsistent scaling.
 
Last edited:
Bro, you are arguing solely on belief because "nothing can surpass absolute infinity" phrase while its tiering is taken to be Low 1-A. So what, if a character with 1-A were to appear in the cosmology, ie 'Aha' because they climbed to the highest branch of the Imaginary Tree, were you going to disagree due to the same reason, that it's "absolute infinity" so it should be unreachable or unable to be transcended?
That's not how absolute infinity, low 1-A, OR 1-A work at all. My argument isn't based "solely on belief," it's based on the fact that absolute infinity BY DEFINITION cannot be quantitatively surpassed or else it wouldn't be absolute infinity. Are you seriously disputing that?

Also, even a 1-A being wouldn't quantitatively surpass absolute infinity. The distinction between quantitative and qualitative infinity is paramount here: absolute infinity CANNOT be quantitatively surpassed, but it CAN be qualitatively surpassed. The issue here is that in this case, "absolute infinity" is quantitatively surpassed which is contradictory.
 
That's not how absolute infinity, low 1-A, OR 1-A work at all. My argument isn't based "solely on belief," it's based on the fact that absolute infinity BY DEFINITION cannot be quantitatively surpassed or else it wouldn't be absolute infinity. Are you seriously disputing that?
I'm not much interested in the topic itself, but I feel this line of reasoning kinda flimsy to dismiss whatever happen in the verse. "Low 1-A" structures, like a Von Neumann Universe, CAN be quantitatively surpassed while still retaining its Low 1-A status. It's obvious while using such a structure and I could understand why you think that "Absolute Infinity" being surpassed may sound dumb but if we're talking, strictly, about the Absolute Infinity regarding math (and set theory) it's ultimately something that can be surpassed using specific axioms and such (heck, I'm almost sure for it to exist you would need axioms in the first place).

Low 1-A is technically still dealing with quality rather than quantity. A Proper Class for example doesn't "really" possess a size, yet, said class is defined by the fact it's encompass more or less everything, being so "large" that it can't have a cardinality. We're treading on the quality aspect, as mentioned. As such, multiple structures could bear this very same quality while encompassing or not a bigger structure.

I think you may be confusing the idea of Absolute Infinity as in the philosophical idea (which, indeed, would be weird for it to be surpassed) and the Absolute Infinity in math.
 
Where is this stated? Also, even before coming up with that idea, Flamescion Kiana was still able to severely harm and keep up with False God Otto whos power is supposed to be "absolutely infinite" as pointed out in the profiles, thus making her scale to "absolute infinity" as well which is problematic for the reasons I outlined (this level of power got quantitatively surpassed)

Except none of those stipulations are said by the book at all. It just straight up says that being an imaginary space "means absolute infinity," not that "being an imaginary space that has been graced by the Tree means absolute infinity." You're just making a headcanon distinction to justify this incoherent scaling.
Until you realise that otto himself got powers by imaginary tree to even be able to make a supposed absolute infinity space. heres also stated to be graced by imaginary tree. In CN hes even called "slave" of imaginary tree. So this strictly proves that Imaginary Tree is one and absolute structure with "Absolute Infinity". Had this been surpassed the lmaginary Tree could have been easily destroyed affected and transcended in fact which...NEVER happened.
So if we go by this "Absolute Infinity" was never surpassed in the first place, people downscale from it not upscale.
And for the Imaginary space, ill conqur i can say that the only possible space being Low 1-A can be the Ottos church while other can vary but again nothing is truly scaling to the actual absolute infinity being imaginary tree. and as sweet dao explained things like this can happen in fiction and honestly, if we beat each other up for the fact something is "superior" to absolute infinity
Then by default no one should ever be quantitatively superior than anyone whos 1-A (i.e 1-A person quantitatively> another 1-A person) and these things are ignored due to Fiction being simply fiction.
But then again you yourself has shown us that ultima doesnt like "absolute infinty" in general so this crt is will just pass one way or another.
and for the profiles itself, all of that can be fixed, all of it. we actively work on it to be fixed, but of course it takes time for it, considering all the nuking of profiles and ultra rushed crts by Garrixian, so all in all just find any profile who supposedly "surpasses" the "Absolute Infinty" from Imaginary Tree that isnt Yog as she baltantly Transcends it, and the profile isnt even finished sso idk why is she even uploaded but thats for another crt.
 
That's not how absolute infinity, low 1-A, OR 1-A work at all. My argument isn't based "solely on belief," it's based on the fact that absolute infinity BY DEFINITION cannot be quantitatively surpassed or else it wouldn't be absolute infinity. Are you seriously disputing that?
low 1-A doesn't quantitatively surpass it though.
Low 1-A is given to those Who are beyond such notions like numbers and quantity of dimension yet still has continuity with the verse which disqualify them for 1-A
 
It's obvious while using such a structure and I could understand why you think that "Absolute Infinity" being surpassed may sound dumb but if we're talking, strictly, about the Absolute Infinity regarding math (and set theory) it's ultimately something that can be surpassed using specific axioms and such (heck, I'm almost sure for it to exist you would need axioms in the first place).
What exactly do you think "Absolute Infinity regarding math" even means? There is no such definition of "absolute infinity" that is limited enough to be quantitatively surpassed. At that point, we're not even talking about absolute infinity anymore, but are making up words just to defend Low 1-A Honkai which is ridiculous.
Low 1-A is technically still dealing with quality rather than quantity. A Proper Class for example doesn't "really" possess a size, yet, said class is defined by the fact it's encompass more or less everything, being so "large" that it can't have a cardinality. We're treading on the quality aspect, as mentioned. As such, multiple structures could bear this very same quality while encompassing or not a bigger structure.
Wrong, low 1-A is still quantitative superiority. And that is irrelevant to the fact that absolute infinity cannot be quantitatively surpassed.
 
What exactly do you think "Absolute Infinity regarding math" even means? There is no such definition of "absolute infinity" that is limited enough to be quantitatively surpassed.
It means there is a massive difference between the philosophical idea of Absolute Infinity (God, basically) and the "Absolute Infinity" using the maximal principle to be "the strongest" regarding Set Theory. Heck, I'm not even sure the Absolute Infinity would include cardinals that aren't accepted with the axiom of choice.
Wrong, low 1-A is still quantitative superiority. And that is irrelevant to the fact that absolute infinity cannot be quantitatively surpassed.
It's the threshold where "quantity doesn't really matter anymore". The whole point of the universe of set is "being the set of all set without being a set itself", indeed it is larger than anything below it, but still doesn't possess cardinality or "size" strictly speaking. It would be ranked Low 1-A because "it's strictly bigger than anything you could put in it" without possessing a qualitative difference like an R>F for example, but, it would still possess the quality of "no matter what's inside, it can contain it".

Why do you think some concepts (in other verses) can reach Low 1-A, which are abstract in nature and as such doesn't have "size per se", if it was strictly a tier you could only reach via quantitative size? If something is defined with "can contain any and all expansion of space/time/dimensions without being any of those three" it would most likely reach Low 1-A or perhaps 1-A depending on the specificities.
 
the "Absolute Infinity" using the maximal principle to be "the strongest" regarding Set Theory. Heck, I'm not even sure the Absolute Infinity would include cardinals that aren't accepted with the axiom of choice.
No one defines absolute infinity in that way. It's ridiculous to make up definitions out of thin air just to defend a verse's scaling.
 
No one defines absolute infinity in that way. It's ridiculous to make up definitions out of thin air just to defend a verse's scaling.
I couldn't care less about Honkai Impact (or anything Hoyo Branded, really), trust me, I just think the logic you're using is wrong. I think you would be better off questioning the "Absolute Infinity" statements or whatever implies scaling rather than stating "yeah Absolute Infinity can't be surpassed, so that's wrong".

In any case, V and Absolute Infinity shares their properties (not being a "size"/"exceeding size as a whole", "can't be reach via lower amount of something", reflection principle and such), we already know V can be encompassed or extended, so it's the same for Absolute Infinity.
(In all honesty, I think Absolute Infinity should rather be 1-A, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to prove this.)
 
I completely disagree with the downgrade. Other people already explained why the argument is flawed, so I wont go into too much details, but I will say that using the argument of "absolute infinity can't be surpassed" which at best only applies to our current knowledge of real life into a fictional setting and applying it to the Imaginary Tree/Space and Honkai, all of which have several statements of being illogical to begin with, definitely doesn't sit right with me at all. Heck, even random Honkai Beasts have statements of having powers that trascend logic, so trying to apply real life logic to them and say that far stronger characters can't have powers that surpass something because of real life logic is, in my opinion, a flawed argument to begin with.
 
In any case, V and Absolute Infinity shares their properties (not being a "size"/"exceeding size as a whole", "can't be reach via lower amount of something", reflection principle and such), we already know V can be encompassed or extended, so it's the same for Absolute Infinity.
(In all honesty, I think Absolute Infinity should rather be 1-A, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to prove this.)
No they don't. At least from how we treat V on the wiki, V can be surpassed. Absolute infinity cannot be quantitatively surpassed by definition. The two are entirely different. You literally have to redefine "absolute infinity" entirely if you want to say that anything can surpass it.
I think you would be better off questioning the "Absolute Infinity" statements or whatever implies scaling
That's probably a good idea. I've consulted with someone on Discord who actually knows Chinese and he said that the book statement means something more like "this is a one of the realms of imaginary space, one that is defined as absolute 'infinity'" so there may not necessarily be a problem where Kalpas scales to absolute infinity and gets quantitatively surpassed.

But from what I've discussed with him, it's also evident that there is still a problem with interpreting this as Cantor's "absolute infinity" in the first place. First of all, the phrasing of "绝对的无限" is different from what is actually used to refer to Cantor's "absolute infinity" in Chinese. Thus, the meaning of this phrase does not necessarily strictly denote Cantor's conception of "absolute infinity" but must instead be understood with context. By itself, "绝对的无限" does in fact somewhat imply Cantor's meaning of "absolute infinity," but this implication is overridden by context suggesting otherwise. Here, Otto's power after connecting with the Imaginary Tree is said to be something that is still limited, only being "nearly infinite" with him not even being able to unleash all of it as an individual. Additionally, Otto was described as only being "close" to godhood, being nothing but a slave of the Imaginary Tree, further indicating that Otto's power still had limits. This strongly goes against the idea that his power was truly "absolutely infinite" in the sense that Cantor meant, as "absolute infinity" would have no limits whatsoever.

Another thing that raises a problem with interpreting "绝对的无限" as Cantor's conception of "absolute infinity" is the fact that the Imaginary Tree is stated to be "transfinite" in scale, with the concept of transfinite numbers being able to describe said scale. The issue here is that "transfinite" was literally a word coined by Cantor to specifically denote infinities that are NOT "absolute infinity." It has also been pointed out in this thread that the Von Neumann universe V and absolute infinity are too big to actually correspond to any "number" or "size" at all, yet in the scan above, Einstein confines the scale of the Imaginary Tree to "the concept of transfinite numbers" and describes it as "transfinite," which speaks against its supposedly-absolute infinite extent

On top of all of that, it's important to look more closely into the phrasing of 绝对的无限. In the original scan, there are actually quotation marks around 无限 or "infinity." In addition to the context that I have mentioned above, this further casts doubt on any strict, literal interpretation of 绝对的无限 as denoting Cantor's conception of "absolute infinity" since quotation marks in Chinese are often used to denote proper nouns/names (which are obviously not the most credible sources of scaling) as well as metaphors.
 
absolute infinity can't be surpassed" which at best only applies to our current knowledge of real life into a fictional setting and applying it to the Imaginary Tree/Space and Honkai, all of which have several statements of being illogical to begin with, definitely doesn't sit right with me at all. Heck, even random Honkai Beasts have statements of having powers that trascend logic, so trying to apply real life logic to them and say that far stronger characters can't have powers that surpass something because of real life logic is, in my opinion, a flawed argument to begin with
That is stupid, by that logic you can make high boundless because "there is no reason to NOT believe that there is a way to completely suprass negative theology and we just aren't unable to compherend it with our limited monkey brain, or just haven't discovered yet"
PD: Also ultima said that using trascending logic as a way to pull more tier out of someone arses is a good way to derail things into utter inane "omnistavance suggsverse" level of nonsense, which I agree with him (for once).
 
But from what I've discussed with him, it's also evident that there is still a problem with interpreting this as Cantor's "absolute infinity" in the first place. First of all, the phrasing of "绝对的无限" is different from what is actually used to refer to Cantor's "absolute infinity" in Chinese. Thus, the meaning of this phrase does not necessarily strictly denote Cantor's conception of "absolute infinity" but must instead be understood with context. By itself, "绝对的无限" does in fact somewhat imply Cantor's meaning of "absolute infinity," but this implication is overridden by context suggesting otherwise. Here, Otto's power after connecting with the Imaginary Tree is said to be something that is still limited, only being "nearly infinite" with him not even being able to unleash all of it as an individual. Additionally, Otto was described as only being "close" to godhood, being nothing but a slave of the Imaginary Tree, further indicating that Otto's power still had limits. This strongly goes against the idea that his power was truly "absolutely infinite" in the sense that Cantor meant, as "absolute infinity" would have no limits whatsoever.

No, you can google "绝对的无限" and it is going to take you to Cantor's absolute infinity. Nagamits corrects herself soon after by saying it is actually infinity, and frankly she is also outstated here, Otto states several times it is infinite, the book states it is infinite, Prometheus says the same thing, Otto was getting his energy from the Will of Honkai, the latter who is just Prometheus, so she is def more reliable than Nagamitsu when it comes to this, Otto has to scale to it or otherwise turning his power into finite would make no sense. Though, I don't think this really changes much since we have more scaling to Imaginary spaces that don't rely on Otto.

Another thing that raises a problem with interpreting "绝对的无限" as Cantor's conception of "absolute infinity" is the fact that the Imaginary Tree is stated to be "transfinite" in scale, with the concept of transfinite numbers being able to describe said scale. The issue here is that "transfinite" was literally a word coined by Cantor to specifically denote infinities that are NOT "absolute infinity." It has also been pointed out in this thread that the Von Neumann universe V and absolute infinity are too big to actually correspond to any "number" or "size" at all, yet in the scan above, Einstein confines the scale of the Imaginary Tree to "the concept of transfinite numbers" and describes it as "transfinite," which speaks against its supposedly-absolute infinite extent

Not what we use, we use the CN scans for this, it is saying that it is "infinite scale even in the transfinite sense" that is the Imaginary Tree is infinite even in a transfinite sense, not that is transfinite.
 
No, you can google "绝对的无限" and it is going to take you to Cantor's absolute infinity.
That's just a stupid argument. That doesn't say anything about what 绝对的无限 strictly means, especially considering the fact that quotation marks (which Google search can't accurately deal with) imply a less strict/literal meaning. We still have to consider context.
Nagamits corrects herself soon after by saying it is actually infinity, and frankly she is also outstated here, Otto states several times it is infinite, the book states it is infinite, Prometheus says the same thing, Otto was getting his energy from the Will of Honkai, the latter who is just Prometheus, so she is def more reliable than Nagamitsu when it comes to this, Otto has to scale to it or otherwise turning his power into finite would make no sense.
First of all, Otto's statements are not reliable whatsoever. At the same time he spoke of his own power, he himself said that using the power of the Herrscher of the Void would not be able to kill him and proceeds to IMMEDIATELY get killed by it.

Second of all, you also have to consider that there are multiple levels of infinity. Nagamitsu saying what she did indicates that Otto's power was limited and was thus not absolutely infinite, even if you do think that it was transfinite. This is further supported by the fact that he was only "close" to godhood and "nothing but a slave of the imaginary tree." And again, Nagamitsu points out the fact that Otto can't actually unleash all of his power (a limit to his power), something that is never actually contradicted.

Btw, Nagamitsu doesn't really correct herself, it's just that the context of her talking about the infinite and finite is that the infinite and finite are simply infinite and finite "in our eyes." It may or may not be the case that Otto's power was still transfinite, but that it was "not really infinite" in the sense of still having limits.

And as for Prometheus, she's just being hyperbolic. She even calls Otto "all-powerful" which is obviously not meant to be taken literally.
Though, I don't think this really changes much since we have more scaling to Imaginary spaces that don't rely on Otto.
Are you talking about Kalpas or what? That just causes all of the contradictions I pointed out in the first place. There are many people who scale to imaginary spaces but proceed to have their power quantitatively exceeded.
Not what we use, we use the CN scans for this, it is saying that it is "infinite scale even in the transfinite sense" that is the Imaginary Tree is infinite even in a transfinite sense, not that is transfinite.
That's the same thing
 
Last edited:
One thing I haven't brought up is the fact that Cantor also defined absolute infinity as being apophatic and beyond mathematical comprehension, equivalent to capital-G God. That entirely ruins any scaling for Honkai, so you guys obviously would not want to use that definition at all. Instead, I know you guys want to define "absolute infinity" as V or something along those lines.

The issue here is that nobody actually defines "absolute infinity" as V. It's a made up definition. When you redefine "absolute infinity" as V, you're just making up your own definition and inserting it into the text to justify bad scaling. Either we use a real definition, or we use no definition at all and consider it to be a buzzword akin to Yogiri's "ultimate ensemble."
 
One thing I haven't brought up is the fact that Cantor also defined absolute infinity as being apophatic and beyond mathematical comprehension, equivalent to capital-G God. That entirely ruins any scaling for Honkai, so you guys obviously would not want to use that definition at all. Instead, I know you guys want to define "absolute infinity" as V or something along those lines.

The issue here is that nobody actually defines "absolute infinity" as V. It's a made up definition. When you redefine "absolute infinity" as V, you're just making up your own definition and inserting it into the text to justify bad scaling. Either we use a real definition, or we use no definition at all and consider it to be a buzzword akin to Yogiri's "ultimate ensemble."
Yogiri is a featless fraud who jobs to covid, not equivalent.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top