Immeasurable question

[Hirotoswnn1x]

I have a few questions. I would like to ask

Immeasurable speed with the 2nd Temporal Dimension (the 1st Temporal Dimension is a snapshot)

vs.

Immeasurable speed with the 5D Temporal Dimension (the snapshot/object is 4D)

Who would be faster? Or should they be equal?

 

[FriendOfTheTeaParty]

For the second one there's not really any relation between spatial dimensions and speed in this wiki so you could be moving in 25+1-D and still be equivalent in speed to a guy who travels across a time axis in 3+1-D.

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

the first 1

the 2nd one isn't immeasurable speed in the first place

 

[Hirotoswnn1x]

For the second one there's not really any relation between spatial dimensions and speed in this wiki so you could be moving in 25+1-D and still be equivalent in speed to a guy who travels across a time axis in 3+1-D.

If there is already a Time Axis (4D), and it is just a subset of spatial 5D, and that spatial dimension is just a snapshot of its Time, should they be considered equivalent?

 

[Hirotoswnn1x]

the first 1

the 2nd one isn't immeasurable speed in the first place

I mean is, let’s assume A is immeasurable by 5D Time and its speed cannot be measured. How do A and B differ when the reason temporal dimensions affect speed is because it’s more than just a snapshot, but an uncountable infinite number of 4D snapshots? Yet, B also moves through that same quantity of 4D snapshots. Why is the first one faster?

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

I mean is, let’s assume A is immeasurable by 5D Time and its speed cannot be measured. How do A and B differ when the reason temporal dimensions affect speed is because it’s more than just a snapshot, but an uncountable infinite number of 4D snapshots? Yet, B also moves through that same quantity of 4D snapshots. Why is the first one faster?

That wouldn't be speed and more so range or size.


If I'm 5D and my being pierces throughout time doesn't make my movement immeasurable. But makes me omnipresent over it yet in the 5D axis I can move like a normal human then my speed is normal human

 

[Hirotoswnn1x]

That wouldn't be speed and more so range or size.


If I'm 5D and my being pierces throughout time doesn't make my movement immeasurable. But makes me omnipresent over it yet in the 5D axis I can move like a normal human then my speed is normal human

Then why is the 2nd temporal dimension faster? Isn’t it that they both move through an uncountable infinite quantity of 4D snapshots? Since it’s a new snapshot at the same time interval that hasn’t been reached yet, doesn’t that mean they are equivalent? After all, both of them are simply traversing snapshots that exist in the same quantity.

(I mean, both have immeasurable speed properties, but they differ because their objects are temporal and spatial. Btw, originally, their effective quantity is the same the quantity of 4D snapshots.)

 

[Hirotoswnn1x]

But makes me omnipresent over it yet in the 5D axis I can move like a normal human then my speed is normal human

I understand, but I mean is that even within the 5D axis “A” can move like immeasurable speed , but their snapshots of time are not temporal. However, they still possess enough properties to be considered 4D objects.

And “B” also moves immeasurable within the 5D axis, but their snapshots are temporal, which likewise have the properties of 4D objects.

Would B should be faster than A? And if so, why?

 

[TheGreatJedi13]

I understand, but I mean is that even within the 5D axis “A” can move like immeasurable speed , but their snapshots of time are not temporal. However, they still possess enough properties to be considered 4D objects.

And “B” also moves immeasurable within the 5D axis, but their snapshots are temporal, which likewise have the properties of 4D objects.

Would B should be faster than A? And if so, why?

a 3D person moving in 5D doesn't make them immeasurable. It juts grants them interdimensional travel.

and if they move in a 3D sense their movement would be so minuscule but they can move on another extra axis which then needs to have prove that can be used to also moves in the 4th (time) dimension to qualify as immeasurable.

so your question cannot be answered unless you clarify this case

 

[Hirotoswnn1x]

a 3D person moving in 5D doesn't make them immeasurable. It juts grants them interdimensional travel.

and if they move in a 3D sense their movement would be so minuscule but they can move on another extra axis which then needs to have prove that can be used to also moves in the 4th (time) dimension to qualify as immeasurable.

so your question cannot be answered unless you clarify this case

(Assuming both have immeasurable speed).
• A movement is unbound from the flow of linear time with snapshots 4D (not a temporal dimension).
• B movement is unbound from the flow of linear time with snapshots 4D (temporal dimension).

Btw, both snapshots that have the same level and quantity. Shouldn’t they have the equal speed?

 

[OrangeFR]

I’m pretty sure they are equal