- 6,045
- 5,887
What is the term for being able to interact with a Type 5 Acausal?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bruhAcausality type 5
What I mean is, how is that outlined in their P&A section?if you have feat,simple
It would be NLF to assume they're a Type 5 Acausal if they have no other Acausality Type 5 showings and only ever interact with those who are Type 5 AcausalThe only way to interact with Acausality type 5, is to have feats of interacting with acausality type 5
So basically you need Aca 5 to interact with Aca 5
Not necessarily. If character A isn't specifically noted to be acausal and never actually displays transcendence over causality themself meanwhile character B is shown as acausal, then I don't see why we should give the former Acausality Type 5 just for interacting with an acausal beingYou also need to exist outside of it otherwise you can't interact with them.
I didn't read this earlier.Not necessarily. If character A isn't specifically noted to be acausal and never actually displays transcendence over causality themself meanwhile character B is shown as acausal, then I don't see why we should give the former Acausality Type 5 just for interacting with an acausal being
How does that make character B Type 4? They still transcend causality, it's just that character A can interact with them via being able to interact with Type 5 Acausal beingsThat will be Acausality type 4 for the supposed Acausality type 5 being. It means he still exists on a causality system, just not the normal one
Clearly the reason in this specific context is that character A is built different. Anti feats would be showings that outright disprove that they completely transcend causality, not a blatantly significant character interacting with themThose are anti feats without any reasonable justification as to why he can be interacted with.
Again, that doesn't necessarily make it type 4, rather character A is merely the exception due to their own abilityAs Aca 5 page mentioned, interacting with them is virtually impossible.
That's how it works here. If character A is said to transcend causality and character B can interact with him but he doesn't transcend, and there's no inverse mechanic designed to interact with character A, that's Acausality type 4Clearly the reason in this specific context is that character A is built different. Anti feats would be showings that outright disprove that they completely transcend causality, not a blatantly significant character interacting with them
Why is he the exception? And that is why you'll not get Acausality type 5 or it's negation without a reasonAgain, that doesn't necessarily make it type 4, rather character A is merely the exception due to their own ability