Kung Fu panda 7-B

[KnightDark_990]

This CRT is a continuation of this other one:

The calculation I did for Lei Lang's hammer:

Even Bayverse was accepted for 7-B due to these calculations:

Regarding upgrading the verse to 7-B:
Agree:
Disagree:
Neutral:

 

[Secimatar]

Disagree cuz Legends of Awsomeness is non-canon and the non-canon profiles already scale far higher than 7-B and from the way u word it, it seems like this was meant as an upgrade to canon portion which this doesn't apply too.

 

[KnightDark_990]

Disagree cuz Legends of Awsomeness is non-canon and the non-canon profiles already scale far higher than 7-B and from the way u word it, it seems like this was meant as an upgrade to canon portion which this doesn't apply too.

LOA was accepted as canonical
see the canonical profiles of the verse.

 

[Secimatar]

LOA was accepted as canonical
see the canonical profiles of the verse.

oh yeah u r right, I thought only the movies are considered canon on vsbw. In this case I agree although I noticed 1 thing in the calc

Violent fragmentation (69 j/cc) = 13274793534900000

Small town (Low 7-B)

Pulverization (214 j/cc)=41171098789400000 joules

City (7-C)

Small town is Low 7-C and city is 7-B

 

[KnightDark_990]

oh yeah u r right, I thought only the movies are considered canon on vsbw. In this case I agree although I noticed 1 thing in the calc

Small town is Low 7-C and city is 7-B

Small City. I wrong
Sorry

 

[Mr. Bambu]

You're a bit early for a CRT. You'd need to get the calc approved first.

Out of curiosity, where was Legends of Awesomeness accepted as canon, if this was disputed previously?

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Out of curiosity, where was Legends of Awesomeness accepted as canon, if this was disputed previously?

Here I believe

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Here I believe

Hm. Sort of skimping on the discussion of it as canon, though it was technically in there. Only Ant and DDM gave whole-thread agreement, and both were just "I agree". Luckily @GyroNutz is still staff and could appear to talk about it, ig.

The calc still needs evaluated but for now I suppose I'd move forward assuming it is canon.

 

[Delusionaltx2]

This might be minor but there's a better way to pixel scale which is to just divide the known measurement of something by its pixels and multiply it by the pixels of what ur measuring

In this case that would be (Mountain height/Mt height in pixels)*Width in pixels = Width in meters


Also idk if calcing the volume the same way vsbw does for normal mountains is okay. Iirc vsbws volume calcs use mainly triangular shaped mountains while this looks more like a cylinder