Layers and Dimensions

[Monarch_Laciel]

So, say reality is made up of infinite higher layers, like in Uminkeo.

And say each layer has infinite dimensions.

Would a character of the second layer, transcendent to the first layer of infinite dimensions, be 1-A due to transcending infinite dimensions, or would they just be a High 1-B due to still being stuck in their own infinite heirarchy of layers?

 

[ThisIsMySwagPack]

1-A characters have no dimensional limitations. They are beyond all dimensional scale.

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

I would say still High 1-B, as they have to be beyond the concept of the first layer, rather than transcendent. And it has tone transcend towards the hierarchy of layers, rather than one layer.

But that is simply just my opinion .

 

[DarkLK]

May be. Or not. We need a context.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

1-A characters have no dimensional limitations. They are beyond all dimensional scale.

Characters of the second layer would be beyond the infinite dimensional limitations of the first layer.

@2ES For purposes here, transcendent also means "beyond the concepts of"

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

@DarkLK, not really much more context to go on. Just a thought experiment I was wondering

 

[DarkLK]

Depending on how it's all described. You may well have the difference between each layer as between 10-C and 1-A.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

Damn, that's huge.

Ok, say any higher layer sees the lower layers as fiction to be read and re-written at any point. At the very minimum, what would that be? That was kinda what I was thinking, like Umineko

 

[DarkLK]

Ok, say any higher layer sees the lower layers as fiction to be read and re-written at any point. At the very minimum, what would that be?

Difference between dimensions. Most likely.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

So if the difference between layers is equivalent to a dimensional difference, but a single layer can hold infinite dimensions, what would that make a second layer being? High 1-B or 1-A?

Also, when I say the lower layers are fiction, I mean everything on the lower layers, concepts included.

 

[DarkLK]

It will be 1-A if you make it 1-A. That is, if you make it clear to understand that any dimension from the second layer is no longer actually a dimension in the physical sense, but rather a higher metaphysical analogue, which is superior to the physical dimensions of any order.

 

[Monarch_Laciel]

Is that what Umineko has? Higher meta-physical analogues? I just kinda assumed they were "higher worlds" when I was reading it.

 

[DarkLK]

Something like that.

 

[VenomElite]

It generally depends on the context the author gives.

 

[Lina_Shields]

So, say reality is made up of infinite higher layers, like in Uminkeo.
And say each layer has infinite dimensions.

Would a character of the second layer, transcendent to the first layer of infinite dimensions, be 1-A due to transcending infinite dimensions, or would they just be a High 1-B due to still being stuck in their own infinite heirarchy of layers?

Isn't transcending an infinite-dimensional hierarchy be automatically be classified as 1-A anyways?

 

[Dragonmasterxyz]

I don't understand this at all. Once you hit 1-A, aren't dimensional layers kind of a null point for you?

 

[Antvasima]

@Lina Not necessarily. It usually just means a higher degree of High 1-B, unless it is clearly specified that the character genuinely transcends the concepts of space and time in their entirely.

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

Can there be dimensional layers of 1-A ?

 

[Antvasima]

Not dimensional layers obviously, but certainly a lot of different levels.

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

So hierarchies of 1-A's, like Chulthu Mythos are possible ?

 

[Antvasima]

Or Umineko, yes.

 

[The_2nd_Existential_Seed]

I see. Thanks for the response .

 

[Antvasima]

No problem.