• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Logic Manipulation Addition Thread

Übel from Sousou no Frieren, no idea if she'd qualify for the ability. Her gimmick is abusing a magic that cuts anything she thinks she can cut, alongside her own intuition to visualize cutting things she logically can't— like cutting a cloak that is impossible for magic to penetrate just because she can picture cloth being cut.
 
Seems like the combination of Subjective Reality, Reality Warping and Plot Manipulation. Turn lie into truth and truth into lie is most of the time Subjective Reality
 
Seems like the combination of Subjective Reality, Reality Warping and Plot Manipulation. Turn lie into truth and truth into lie is most of the time Subjective Reality
What about my statement above?
Ok, so I propose that Marvel Magic gets Logic Manipulation, particularly based on the following:

Magic is also simultaneously outside the concepts of logic yet can also replace them.
Also:

Magic is even stated to be a conceptual system that allows an individual to control the natural world (including events, objects, people, and physical phenomena).

Magic is also stated to create beings of story and metaphor, and to be immeasurable, unpredictable, and not bound by any laws or rules.

Magic is all about the breaking down of scientific constants.

Magic at its core is stated to be the practice of making the universe bend to one's will by speaking words of power.
 
The scan talking about concept of logic as in it break science. Rather than manipulating or being underlying logic that can creating paradox, contradiction

Law & Chaos hax? Also most of these things seems like Magic break scientific logic
Worth a shot.
 
So is there anyone else who wants to try and get the ability added somewhere? So far we have these that I think we should consider, in order from (imo) most reasonable to least reasonable:
 
Some more arguments were made for Alovenus, but it seems lengthy. So I'll just keep it to a crt I had planned like initially with some more explanation
 
Will this qualify for Paradox Creation?? (For Context: this feat was done by the Girl/Princess who controls the world)

Staggering, dragging one leg behind him, D went around behind the girl. He looked at the face of her partner. It was Sheriff Krutz. And it was D. It was both, and it was neither. The man she’d danced with for three decades under the blue light of the moon, and the man summoned to wake the slumbering princess.
 
Will this qualify for Paradox Creation?? (For Context: this feat was done by the Girl/Princess who controls the world)

Staggering, dragging one leg behind him, D went around behind the girl. He looked at the face of her partner. It was Sheriff Krutz. And it was D. It was both, and it was neither. The man she’d danced with for three decades under the blue light of the moon, and the man summoned to wake the slumbering princess.
I'd say maybe, but I'd need further context to make a definite judgement.
 
I'd say maybe, but I'd need further context to make a definite judgement.
Further context is this: The world D was in is entirely controlled by the girl/princess. Everyone and everything (including all events and aspects of reality) in it was created and controlled by the girl. When D went to the world to kill the girl, she created a partner (her ex-lover) to protect her. However, she also fell for D and wanted him to kill her. So when D killed the Partner in a duel and went to look at his face, that's when this scene happened.
 
Further context is this: The world D was in is entirely controlled by the girl/princess. Everyone and everything (including all events and aspects of reality) in it was created and controlled by the girl. When D went to the world to kill the girl, she created a partner (her ex-lover) to protect her. However, she also fell for D and wanted him to kill her. So when D killed the Partner in a duel and went to look at his face, that's when this scene happened.
Hmm. I'll wait for DT to evaluate it, but I'd say it probably qualifies.
 
Alright, another weekend, another round of this. Let's go.
It was more so for not being affected by reason in said reality. But if it's not qualified, then I'll just pen it as part of his plot hax or being beyond their understanding
That seems too unspecific.
In a sense, yes, but this time it was achieved without the use of chaos. There was just a mention of it being a paradox rather than just overcoming immunity from a lack of suchan aspect, etc. There was also a mention later in that video where the energy or whatever is left from those affected became something like Paraconsistent, and no longer something that qualifies from either side of Creation, and being paradoxical
Ah, didn't realize that's a different thing altogether. But then, isn't the paradox in question just rebirthing something without a concept of death? That might be conceptual shenanigans, but not outright a violation of logic proper.
I guess that's true. Then I would just list it as Paradox Creation and Erasure for Chaos (Since Chaos Matters, which is what Beelzebub used specifically, is still stated to erode providence, which includes logic).
While the immortality bypassing would just be causality hax related. (I was under the impression it is also Logic manipulation since it negates even regenerative factors or the concept of indestructibility [Primal Beast/Fallen Angels represent a concept, idea, or abstract]. and not just immortality)
I suppose that's fine. Just mind the limitations when it comes to applying that in vs-thread.
Now, last question. Would this grant the Creator of Providence, or where Providence originates from, Logic creation? Since I'm currently making a profile for those Creators for the said franchise
I don't really see which rule of logic they are supposed to have created.
And if not too much. a question that would help understand logic manipulation
Is there anyway being able to affect the Principles qualify in a form of logic manipulation? Since the Law of Excluded Middle and Non-Contradiction is a principle on which Classic Logic is built.
Are the Law of Excluded Middle and Non-Contradiction explained to be part of the laws that are Principles? Like, if you have a set of laws of logic and a character can erase all laws in that set, that would be logic manipulation. Just haven't really seen those laws been explicitely mentioned in the verse.
@DontTalkDT There's some statements about things outside of logic that's very similar to the logical principle examples you have like mathematics and cause and effect in the world.
Mathematics and causality changes are specifically mentioned to not qualify for logic manipulation.
🤔This confuses me a little, because she does things which match with the logic page pretty well. The "mental reasoning" is like an example of her power controlling everything too. Currently it's marked as CM, law, plot, etc. But the author seems to want us to also understand she can mess with all this, because with logic, and breaks all these rules. She is illogical, inconsistent & unrealistic. So...what do we consider these kind of things, when the author drops all these statements of breaking logic and reason, and is supposed to be separate from other aspects?

She is basically messing with logic and perception, which when altered cause madness. These things govern the existence, or reality, thus she can mess with all of it. Her power enables and ignores contradictions, is clearly nonsensical, and thus alters rules like cooling water making fire and vice versa simply by manipulating reason.

Alovenus is clearly manipulating and breaking things that mess with deductive reasoning(theorems, etc), thus using "non-logic"(her own truths) to get results. Messing with logic to enforce your own warrants results like this, where all laws don't apply.


Settings are the main example though. Ignoring even the avatar statements, there are ones in realm of God itself also messing with reason. Where through settings or statements made by the author,"'I am the strongest" is true, and thus surpassing her is denied by her opponents unless they also break logic and reason. This makes it so Alovenus will always be above her opponent and win, because if it's true she is the strongest, her "'not being the strongest" can't be true otherwise. I feel like you could argue messing with law of noncontradiction with this at least. As they create and ignore contradictions to mess with Alovenus's truth, and to get stronger themselves.
So I think it is fair to go over this step by step in order to fully grasp and comprehend the structure of both the world of Awlba and the story as a whole. At its core Awlba isn't just describing characters who break logic in a flashy hyperbolical meaningless way but actually in a setting where reality is rule-based in the sense that what exists in the world follow a specific standard and framework, and where certain beings are violating that condition and rule-based order by existing outside it. Alovenus's story is pretty much structured very carefully to show the difference between her acting within a world's foundations while being able to alter and/or ignore them and her essentially changing those foundations all together.

Establishing the foundations:
On the original universe and earth Alovenus "comes from", reality is presented as essentially normal. People are born, they suffer and they die. Cause and effect works as you'd expect and even miracles (Alovenus doing her thing) do not alter the long term structure of the world. Alovenus appears here as a singularity, an anomaly who is the only being with supernatural power in which a singularity is a point where ordinary description and extrapolation break down, where you cannot keep applying the same rules and expect sensible answers. Her actions, no matter how dramatic are still constrained by the world’s existing foundations (prior to her altering or enforcing new laws and whatnot). She heals the sick, saves the wounded and rescues the suffering, yet the story emphasizes that it is ultimately meaningless, people are "made to die," to be fragile etc and the world inevitably returns to its original state. Her interventions would for the lack of better words be like temporarily changing the positions of furnitures in a collapsing house, basically the structure itself remains unchanged and the outcome does not truly improve.

So the problem in itself was not a lack of power but it was that the world's way of being and its foundations already guaranteed suffering. As long as she existed inside/within that framework while still not being confined by those foundations, everything she fixed would eventually amount to nothing for anyone that's not her, meaning Inference-wise, this is equivalent to a system where a premise such as "this light is on" is always forced by the world's underlying foundational structure to eventually collapse into "this light is not on" either through logical necessity (such as deductive closure within the system's enforced rules) or through ordinary causal progression, like the light being turned off or the light bulb dying out. In such a framework it would be impossible for any proposition to remain indefinitely fixed in a single state, as the world itself restores consistency in accordance with its logical order. So in a world governed by the law of non-contradiction, such a state (the light being both on and not on in the same respect) is impossible. The texts point is that Alovenus eventually moves beyond a world where such prohibitions are foundational (wherein "this light is on" and "this light is not on" are such prohibitions). That realization is essentially what leads directly to her conclusion that saving the world requires flipping it over completely and changing the foundations (essentially reprogramming humans and making them immortal among others things, such as removing the concept of hatred and other bad concepts from their nature etc.)

When Alovenus reaches the "end" of the universe, the text makes it very explicit, such that a being surpassing the speed of light is acknowledged as impossible and catastrophic for ordinary matter, which would normally be just her ignoring the laws of physics and not violating logic, but then the story immediately dismissed it and not because she is "so strong" but because it ties back on her being a singularity, unbound by the universe's laws. So the example she gave us of "cooling water" helps us understand what she alongside the story is actually trying to tell us, cooling water normally produces ice and that expectation represents everyday, unquestioned common sense as well as how physical laws are established and work. When Alovenus declares that cooling water will instead produce fire, the universe does not comply, instead she enforces laws without any regard for whether they preserve consistency, explanation or rational derivation regardless of what the worlds foundational principles says or thinks. So the text is not saying she creates fire, but the rule linking cause to effect has been replaced. Why? Who knows? And normally the question of why only makes sense inside a fixed logical framework. Once the framework itself can be ignored or altered/changed, explanation becomes irrelevant. So the "I can do it" line, instead functions as the truth because truth is no longer derived but instead is imposed unto reality.

This is then reinforced later through Sanieve's divine skill Muliphen. Muliphen is described as applying new laws as firmly and steadfast as normal laws of physics: so cooling freezes and heating boils. It essentially makes it clear and represents laws of reality as something that is causally automatic and unavoidable. Muliphen shows what rule and law enforcement actually looks like when it works normally. Alovenus's earlier example shows what happens when the authority behind the rules changes. One injects laws into a system while the other decides what laws the system recognizes at all.

Add-on Examples:
Thulhu is another great inverse example. He is not the author or god of reality, but a bug, a being that emerged outside the rules and laws of the world. When Sanieve's divine skill Muliphen (Like other skills from other agents of the Goddess, his unique skill has higher priority than any other skills. These skills are absolute as they are permitted by Alovenus rules. They can't be prevented, take absolute priority over all skills in place, and once used are absolutely certain to happen) fails on him, the narration does not describe brute resistance, it just explains that laws simply do not bind him. He exists in contradiction to the Goddess's rules, so the laws shatter on contact. His ability to twist the world into incoherence while blurring near and far, solid and liquid, sense and nonsense, would mirror Alovenus's foundational authority in a distorted way. Not to mention Alovenus's avatar, stated not to be on the level of true form Alovenus (for obvious reasons) but was still absurdly powerful. Wherein she was able to warp reality as much as she wanted, and she could control logic and reason however she liked. All of creation was nothing more than a set of toys to her, creatures mere dolls, so what she was about to do was put on a one-night puppet show. She used Azathoth and flipped everything, thus reality flipped on its head. Black became white and vice versa. Fiction and reality switched places. Even the wicked god's (Thulhu) little world was painted over by the Goddess's selfish rules in an instant. Reality, dreams, the past, the present and the future all came under her control. Nothing was impossible. "I can do it." Such selfishness was allowed and could reach infinity. It could even invent something above infinity, and that was the type of existence the Goddess Alovenus was. Meaning that Thulhu still got caught up in and was affected by Alovenus's avatar's attack, despite being someone who was supposed to be able to ignore and completely disregard the laws of the world by completely existing outside its framework, as well as those laws that were forcefully imposed on him.

Both Alovenus and Thulhu deliberately rewrites common sense of the world, while Thulhu also erodes it by existing outside the worlds jurisdiction. Thulhu is level 1000 between, so even he is nothing compared to level 1500, 2000 and level 4200 Ruphas who was stated to intercept an attack that ignored reason, providence, common sense, logic, theorems, or law, as all of it was powerless and none of it meant anything or could do anything.

Isn't it peculiar that the author brought up common sense, logic, theorems and laws as separate entities?
If we were to define all of them, we'll have to start with common sense.









We also have an entire bar encounter in an afterword where the laws of physics and the law of conservation of mass are complaining to the author that Ruphas is bending them over and shoving their backside with a cactus, due to how she essentially treats them as irrelevant and only uses them when it is convenient for her.

It is starting to make a lot of sense to say that a law in Awlba isn't simply a rule or principle that allows one to understand how physical interaction is possible, among other things, but that it instead should be viewed as an umbrella that encompasses a multitude of things simultaneously. As such, a law being imposed by Alovenus might be a rule in which hot=hot,hot=cold, cold=cold, blue=red, blue≠blue and/or even be a concept or a plot/narrative.

So it would make sense to argue that since Alovenus is an all-encompassing entity, her law manipulation isn’t simply just law manipulation, but instead includes logic, common sense, plot, conceptual manipulation among others as byproducts in a complete package which is her setting.

Both Ruphas and Benetnash are born in Midgard, a world whose foundations Alovenus already altered from her previous world. Through levels and mana, the world gradually allows inhabitants to escape ordinary constraints. When you reach higher levels such as 1000 and 1500 (after breaking the metaphysical barrier or limit Alovenus has imposed unto reality), combat is explicitly framed as a contest of who can ignore common sense more. Where breaking through the 1000 level limit was a prerequisite for having the "right to challenge Alovenus" as a starting point. Alovenus has plot manipulation on her profile, as the world itself moves in accordance with the scenario written by Alovenus. This plot manipulation as I mentioned above would include and define all abilities and aspects of reality/creation due to how her powers work, as well as the Final Point, which I will talk about next.

Endpoint/Final Point:
When it comes to the Realm of God, the Endpoint which is an infinite structureless "space" where universes are compared to programs and folders. Here, there, scale, time, distance, size, speed and limits have no inherent meaning unless someone paints them into existence. That is why characters can have infinite speed (though in reality their speed is beyond infinite and immeasurable). They are able to speak in a frozen vacuum and ignore time-based restrictions. The space does not intrinsically have rules/frameworks or boundaries (as it would be the last and all-encompassing boundary of everything) as rules exist only if willed into being by God. When Alovenus declares that reason and providence are nothing, or when Ruphas realizes that victory is simply a matter of asserting "I am stronger," the story is being literal. At this level concepts/laws/logic among others must be created to matter at all.

To add on a point I brought up earlier. On Vsbw Settings imposed by Alovenus (the one in Midgard being known as the Goddess scenario) are already accepted as a form of plot manipulation, and deviating from or ignoring/breaking through that scenario is seen as resistance to plot manipulation or you yourself having plot manipulation. Settings are not ordinary abilities, laws or the likes. But instead they are presented as declared truths imposed unto reality from the Endpoint by God. The Endpoint or otherwise known as the Final Point is more or less a pre-conceptual/pre-creation blank plane where nothing such as laws, causality, logic, providence or even coherent structure exists or bind anyone by default. As such these things only come into being when a God actively defines and enforces them. Because of this, overcoming or ignoring a setting does not simply mean overpowering an attack or bypassing a rule or a law, but it would essentially mean overriding the layer or for the lack of better words, the reason/logic for which decides what counts as true or valid in the first place. With this in mind and seen in this light, the narration's repeated emphasis on reason, providence, common sense, logic, theorems and laws becoming powerless, points to them not being simple rhetorical decorations. As it reflects the fact that the coherence constraints of the scenario itself are being replaced or rendered irrelevant, instead of characters merely misunderstanding events or reasoning incorrectly (but in reality it is pretty much both cases simultaneously due to how the world works).

Overall Conclusion and Summary:
So to sum it all up. Alovenus's progression is going from existing while ignoring restraints/laws in a constrained reality to being truly unconstrained and creating such realities and foundations. As a "mortal" anomaly, she could reshape outcomes, but the world’s foundation would always be itself and absolute. As a god who now occupy the Final Point, instead of violating and existing outside such laws, she would now be the one who controls and imposes such foundations and constraints. Thulhu, Ruphas, Orm and Benetnash among others each reflect different expressions of this same principle: beings for whom the world's rules are absolute but no longer applicable to them (since they do have plot manipulation and resistance to it as well). The contradictions and absurdities that follow are the natural results of a setting where coherence, logic, reason, limit, providence, concepts and laws were never obligatory or binding, but optional constructs enforced only by those with the authority to insist on them.

So if Alovenus was to say:
"The lamp is on. (A)
The lamp is not on. (¬A)
The lamp is neither on nor not on. (¬A ∧ ¬¬A, or, ¬(A ∨ ¬A))
Conclusion: Therefore, the lamp is on and not on, and neither on nor not on."

That would work in her setting because she would make it the truth and define it as what is considered valid, allowing such a paradox to act as if it weren’t one at all. She doesn’t need to explain or justify it, it simply is, due to her authority over these things. This is essentially what the story has been hammering on about.
I could have sworn I saw you say something like:
"As a result, Metaphysical Aspects equal or superior to logic can be considered as High Outerverse level+ aspects of reality as well, provided that their nature does not imply a restriction on the nature of logic, contradicting the above reasoning" wherein it is possible for metaphysical aspects to be equal to or superior to logic, potentially serving as its source, or where logic itself can be instilled into creation and into what exists. Please correct me on this matter if I'm mistaken.

This was longer than I first anticipated, and do excuse me for my formatting, I'm still getting the hang of it all. But either way, I hope this at least made you understand why certain statements were made at said particular moments, and how it all ties back to Alovenus and the Final Point.
TL;DR
Looks to based on the same scans I already read, so I doubt that I would change my mind, though.
Feel free to make a CRT if you want further opinions, not going to evaluate this further in this thread.

Wait, i remembered that if time paradox was simply consequence of manipulating underlying logic then it is still qualify as logic hax?
We would also accept creating a fire ball as logic manipulation, if it's sufficiently clearly established to be done by manipulating logic. But then the act of creating the fireball is no evidence towards the ability being logic manipulation.
You would need an explanation like "Just holding out your hand won't create a fireball. However, he used his power over logic to make it so that holding out his hand would from now on both create and not create a fireball. He held out his hand and nothing happened, yet something happened. A fireball spawned before him out of nothing."
So yeah, you could have time paradox creation by means of logic manipulation, but things in the style of "it's a time paradox. That logically makes no sense!" isn't going to get you there.

I will grant you that the example as a whole, if not the time paradox thing in particular, is one of the more likely candidates for the ability, though. Personally I'm not quite convinced, but I could easily see other staff members have different opinions.
Ok, so I propose that Marvel Magic gets Logic Manipulation, particularly based on the following:

Magic is also simultaneously outside the concepts of logic yet can also replace them.
None of that shows any breaking of logic.
Making fiction reality, even if we were to take it at its absolutely most literal, is just plot stuff.
And manipulating a numerical pattern might be mathematics manipulation, but as you know from reading the page, that doesn't qualify.
Laws and concepts also has nothing to do with logic. Logic is prior to metaphysics.
Übel from Sousou no Frieren, no idea if she'd qualify for the ability. Her gimmick is abusing a magic that cuts anything she thinks she can cut, alongside her own intuition to visualize cutting things she logically can't— like cutting a cloak that is impossible for magic to penetrate just because she can picture cloth being cut.
Definitely not. A power being influenced by how you think about it doesn't qualify.
It makes regularly impossible phenomena possible, but if that's by altering logic seems like guesswork. Like, it could for example also simply have changed what the numbers on the die are.
Will this qualify for Paradox Creation?? (For Context: this feat was done by the Girl/Princess who controls the world)

Staggering, dragging one leg behind him, D went around behind the girl. He looked at the face of her partner. It was Sheriff Krutz. And it was D. It was both, and it was neither. The man she’d danced with for three decades under the blue light of the moon, and the man summoned to wake the slumbering princess.
Further context is this: The world D was in is entirely controlled by the girl/princess. Everyone and everything (including all events and aspects of reality) in it was created and controlled by the girl. When D went to the world to kill the girl, she created a partner (her ex-lover) to protect her. However, she also fell for D and wanted him to kill her. So when D killed the Partner in a duel and went to look at his face, that's when this scene happened.
Idk. Seems like it's quite likely flowery language. Or could be something like a quantum superposition thing... Overall, just not enough to go by.
 
Might as well throw this into the bin since I know this is a common enough trope (as it's based on a real world myth) and honestly it's a very weird thing to classify with the current systems.

A blade is capable of cutting through an object without touching it or moving, no other factors or power systems in place. Would that not be a contradiction in logic by concept as the blade is both attacking and not attacking at the same time?
 
Last edited:
We would also accept creating a fire ball as logic manipulation, if it's sufficiently clearly established to be done by manipulating logic. But then the act of creating the fireball is no evidence towards the ability being logic manipulation.
You would need an explanation like "Just holding out your hand won't create a fireball. However, he used his power over logic to make it so that holding out his hand would from now on both create and not create a fireball. He held out his hand and nothing happened, yet something happened. A fireball spawned before him out of nothing."
So yeah, you could have time paradox creation by means of logic manipulation, but things in the style of "it's a time paradox. That logically makes no sense!" isn't going to get you there.
Yeah, that's what i mean, the reason for the paradox which is logic, not the consequence, which is the paradox

Logic is prior to metaphysics.
Wait, logic must predate metaphysics? It can't be metaphysics?
 
I have a few; my initial thoughts is that they probably don't quailify. but ill throw a hat in to try. If context is needed ill bring scans later

All 3 are separate instances/scenes/plot lines

1.) Using the power if Ice to physically freeze flames the character yells something like "doing the impossible!" While doing it.

2.) Dropping temperature colder than Absolute Zero but making it so cold it loops back to being hot, but infinitely hot but yet still describes as being both cold and hot. But still infinite heat/hot but uts getting hotter by dropping temperatures further beyond (colder) than Absolute Zero

3.) A character is stated to outside the "Worlds logic" to avoid the passive affects the universe had at correcting anomalies. These effect range from Earsure, corruption, forcing 2 people to fight to the death, altering history, etc. But this character is stated to be outside the world's logic so he can not be subjected to that.
 
1.) Using the power if Ice to physically freeze flames the character yells something like "doing the impossible!" While doing it.
Well, this is another instance of doing impossible thing that does not really qualify for logic hax
2.) Dropping temperature colder than Absolute Zero but making it so cold it loops back to being hot, but infinitely hot but yet still describes as being both cold and hot. But still infinite heat/hot but uts getting hotter by dropping temperatures further beyond (colder) than Absolute Zero
Same as point 1, while the feat is more detailed and impressive, and of course you can interpreting this as something that violate logic, it isn't qualify for logic hax since as DontTalk have said, this feat need to be the consequence of manipulating logic, rather than simply a feat that somewhat is illogical but in a vacuum

3.) A character is stated to outside the "Worlds logic" to avoid the passive affects the universe had at correcting anomalies. These effect range from Earsure, corruption, forcing 2 people to fight to the death, altering history, etc. But this character is stated to be outside the world's logic so he can not be subjected to that.
This could grant you resistance/immunity to the things you listed, but i don't think you get logic hax from this, at best, you could somehow get resistance to logic hax but again heavily depends on the verse context that there is underlying logic in the verse
 
Are the Law of Excluded Middle and Non-Contradiction explained to be part of the laws that are Principles? Like, if you have a set of laws of logic and a character can erase all laws in that set, that would be logic manipulation. Just haven't really seen those laws been explicitely mentioned in the verse.
Doesn't this usually comes by default for majority of verses as it is a very fundamental reasoning. because after all no inference would be possible if it does to not exist in the first place. it's like asking for a proof for something when that something has already been shown as violated and happening by in reality. How would you assume something does not exist when there are showing of said things being violated and followed.
Laws and concepts also has nothing to do with logic. Logic is prior to metaphysics.
How would this then work if say there are Axioms. would we assume that logic somehow prior to it as well?
To use an example from the same verse.
It is always assumed that nothing good would would result from reading chaos
ojPXd42.png

That axiom now becomes becomes the foundation for a new deductive reasoning. does this qualify for logic creation or not?
because after all Axiom assumes that it is always True regardless.

As for other examples of people reading chaos we have Kenji attempting to decipher Wardant who is made up of Chaos
 
If I understood things correctly, I think Haruhi Suzumiya counts, but to preface I am not a supporter so I might be wrong
Taking from the profile
Data includes laws, laws support reality. Haruhi can manipulate data, aka what builds up laws
I believe that this should fall under Logic Creation, as she creates and manipulates logic
 
Ah no, logic is kind of thing that govern shit to make them a reasonable existence, so logic hax is an ability that can violate reason and make contradictory thing
 
Ah no, logic is kind of thing that govern shit to make them a reasonable existence, so logic hax is an ability that can violate reason and make contradictory thing
Does this mean that if something is "order" and "harmony" in a universe to "maintain balance" or "keep things existing" or "keep things alive." It is logic Manipulation to control/manipulate that order/harmony?
 
Does this mean that if something is "order" and "harmony" in a universe to "maintain balance" or "keep things existing" or "keep things alive." It is logic Manipulation to control/manipulate that order/harmony?
No not really, these seems like metaphorical words to describe protection in a sense, logic hax more so includes the invalidation of deductive reasoning and creating logically contradictory events/outcomes that violate the laws of thought in some way or form.
(One of many applications but yea, something like that)
 
No not really, these seems like metaphorical words to describe protection in a sense, logic hax more so includes the invalidation of deductive reasoning and creating logically contradictory events/outcomes that violate the laws of thought in some way or form.
Nah its literal I just paraphrased it and left 20 pages of exposition out lol.
 
Does this mean that if something is "order" and "harmony" in a universe to "maintain balance" or "keep things existing" or "keep things alive." It is logic Manipulation to control/manipulate that order/harmony?
Depend on what kind of Order and Harmony they are. But generally speaking, most of the time they aren't logic
 
Depend on what kind of Order and Harmony they are. But generally speaking, most of the time they aren't logic
Just curious so I know what to look for but what should I be looking fir as qualifiers related to this?

Im heading to work soon so I cant post anything in detail yet
 
Ah no, logic is kind of thing that govern shit to make them a reasonable existence, so logic hax is an ability that can violate reason and make contradictory thing
I didn't get an answer previously so I'll ask again since I feel like this is going to be attempted at some point

A blade is capable of cutting through an object without touching it or moving, no other factors or power systems in place. Would that not violate reason and be contradictory since it's both attacking and not attacking at the same time? And if not then what possible trait could that be associated to?
 
I didn't get an answer previously so I'll ask again since I feel like this is going to be attempted at some point

A blade is capable of cutting through an object without touching it or moving, no other factors or power systems in place. Would that not violate reason and be contradictory since it's both attacking and not attacking at the same time? And if not then what possible trait could that be associated to?
You could argue for Logic but ngl, i think it is pretty high interpretation, since some other powers such as causality manipulation can feasibly do this as well
 
Could this character qualify for some sort logic manipulation? It's mentioned that he has reached peak swordmanship that he can even slice people without even wielding a sword, stated to have trancends the realms of logic.
 
Wait, logic must predate metaphysics? It can't be metaphysics?
Depends a lot on the specifics and philosophy. Someone like Descartes would hold that God is the ground of logical truths.
Mmmmhhh... Idk. Time paradoxes don't qualify for logical paradoxes in our book.
A triangle with 720° interior angles is also possible in some weird non-Euclidean geometries.
I guess square circles might be an example, but I feel like that may be better classified as mathematics manipulation?
I’m really not sure why we’re being so strict on this. The second one feels like a super cheap cop-out to clear authorial intent, and the general context of it.

Not to mention it’s one of the most blatant examples of something like Meinong’s distinction between character and being of an object, where it literally tells you that things can have existence as words (definitions) whilst completely lacking subsistence due to them being impossible.
 
Could this character qualify for some sort logic manipulation? It's mentioned that he has reached peak swordmanship that he can even slice people without even wielding a sword, stated to have trancends the realms of logic.
Most likely another of doing impossible shit that look illogical

Depends a lot on the specifics and philosophy. Someone like Descartes would hold that God is the ground of logical truths.
Isn't this shit, like, tier 0 thing?

@DontTalkDT

What about this?

Pretty much Reason/Logic is prior and underlying causality and fate, which, of course, thing that manipulate it can cause time/causal paradox too
 
Most likely another of doing impossible shit that look illogical
I mean it's kinda consistent in the verse as Gods have invulnerability to mortal weapons as they trancend the realms of logic.

They also can alter universal laws
 
Last edited:
Isn't this shit, like, tier 0 thing?
He holds God as (sorta) Pure Act, yes. Nevertheless it’s extremely strange because even Aquinas holds that God can’t do logically contradictory things by virtue of the latter lacking potency entirely, whereas Descartes holds that he can js will logical truths into existence and stuff like that. Whatever, his philosophy in general is pretty cheeks.

(Edit: Now that I reallyyy think about it, I’m not sure if it’d be tier 0; it’s been a long time since I read his work so my memory is a bit fuzzy and shi.)

I still obviously disagree with DT though.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top