- 934
- 372
No staff members other than you have even commented on the current proposalWell, it seems like our staff members here have accepted this revision, so it can probably be applied now.![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No staff members other than you have even commented on the current proposalWell, it seems like our staff members here have accepted this revision, so it can probably be applied now.![]()
Can't speak for the rest but I just agreed that the extent to which they can affect metaphysical aspects should be noted on each magic tier for the characters.Really? The first post of this thread lists several staff accepting a new suggested revision here. What do they potentially need to evaluate in addition to that?![]()
I was referring to the revised suggestion that the comment you were quoting was talking about, since I assumed you meant that since it was what you were quoting itReally? The first post of this thread lists several staff accepting a new suggested revision here. What do they potentially need to evaluate in addition to that?![]()
The most recent proposal is “I already talk to @Eseseso and others that the only way out is removing some abilities from basic magic tabber and adding it to the Nature of magic tabber and adding a note stating the non combat and combat applicable of basic magic since that were the issue is coming from and Low Sorcerers level are all spell casters with valid combat application of magic”What is the current proposal being discussed?
I don't see how this makes sense when most of the stuff on basic magic is what is "required" to make a spell and not really an effect of magic itself, it will also be weird for every character with resitance to basic magic.The most recent proposal is “I already talk to @Eseseso and others that the only way out is removing some abilities from basic magic tabber and adding it to the Nature of magic tabber and adding a note stating the non combat and combat applicable of basic magic since that were the issue is coming from and Low Sorcerers level are all spell casters with valid combat application of magic”
AgreedI don't see how this makes sense when most of the stuff on basic magic is what is "required" to make a spell and not really an effect of magic itself, it will also be weird for every character with resitance to basic magic.
The only proposel I see making sense is adding a note on the marvel magic page saying something like "While they have all those powers on basic magic they are limited to using it in the ways they have been shown to do on their profile" although this is basically a reminder that we have a page explaining what is NLF rather than anything else.
Planck, theglassman, lephyrtherevanchist, and elzihaa all disagree with removing concept manipulation type 1 but seem to agree with making notes about what different characters able to do with itWhat revisions have our staff members agreed to apply here then?
They’re going to keep it but it’s going to be noted that they can only use it in ways they’ve demonstratedso are all basic magic users keeping cm 1 and plot manip or is it being changed to resistance only
I mean usually the justification of Type 1 CM is just showings of concepts being affected or said character being able to do so via comparisons to others with showings, but for like Hulk its just "he can use gamma which has magic"Honestly I feel like stating what Type 1 CM should be used for should apply to a lot more verses, but we still got conceptual souls in Marvel which all magic can affect, so I guess it is what it is
Gamma also has it due to being the essence of TOBA.I mean usually the justification of Type 1 CM is just showings of concepts being affected or said character being able to do so via comparisons to others with showings, but for like Hulk its just "he can use gamma which has magic"
I always forget abt that.Gamma also has it due to being the essence of TOBA.
Tbf Marvel went crazy with the Hulk lore. It's not a bad thing but goddamn they embraced the memes about Marvel wank entirely.I always forget abt that.
and here I thought hulk was planet level at bestTbf Marvel went crazy with the Hulk lore. It's not a bad thing but goddamn they embraced the memes about Marvel wank entirely.
Whatand here I thought hulk was planet level at best
yep, then I discovered he's freaking OUTERVERSALWhat![]()
and here I thought hulk was planet level at best
Even as far back as the 80's his clash with someone shook the infinite dimensions of the Crossroadsyep, then I discovered he's freaking OUTERVERSAL
i'd say that's an outlier but knowing marvel that's probably consistent lmfaoEven as far back as the 80's his clash with someone shook the infinite dimensions of the Crossroads
Once you look into the feats of those like Doctor Strange, Thor, Hulk, Silver Surfer, etc, you realize that when they're not restricted by plot or the Worf Effect they're absolute monsters in both power and hax.i'd say that's an outlier but knowing marvel that's probably consistent lmfao
and here I thought hulk was planet level at best
marvel writers be making hulk destroy a universe then next issue he achieves a new highest state of power and instantly jobs to some street thug or somethingYou are smarter than those who write him, that's for sure
nopeisn't Hulk fighting with TOAA anyway
TOAA 7-B attack in questionnope
Tbh, that was hater who spread misinformation actuallyTOAA 7-B attack in question
that scan was fake, don't worry, and that wasn't TOAATOAA 7-B attack in question