Megumin full power 7-B vs Steve 7-C roblox

[Davidliteral]

Steve (Minecraft) vs Megumin (Kono Subarashii Sekai ni Shukufuku Wo!) Because why not?

Megumin was out to train her explosion magic and its started to rain and now she's wet now, then she suddenly encounters him. Steve hates pillagers and found her thinking she was new type of illager mob. They lock each other eyes and prepares to fight.

Steve is 7-C and Megumin is 7-B. Steve has all his equipments.

Starting distance: 100meters.

Weather condition: lightning storm, it's raining probably.

Megumin - 2 (Wokista, ShiroyashaGinSa)

Steve - 0 ()

Inconclusive - 0 ()

 

[Wokistan]

AP GG

Seriously tho what is Steve supposed to do about a 7-A explosion just spawning on him

 

[ShiroyashaGinSan]

Yeah, I'm going to vote for Magumin for Wok's reason.

 

[Davidliteral]

Maybe you guys should read Minecraft's gamepedia so you could see the reason why AP isn't everything to win a fight. 7-C fighting 7-A seems not legit fight so I will tone it down to Vol 3. Steve was especialist to explosion and fire damage with his enchantment and potion. Notch Apple makes him super durable. Totem of Undying. Ender Pearl. etc. etc.

IIRC Megumin doesn't instantly summon explosions, her incantation are too slow, Ender Pearl easily dodge, and her spell drains alotta of her stamina. I hope you get the meme of Megumin's power, that's why Megumin was in the meme community.

 

[Jinsye]

yeah but

He can just

punch

 

[ShiroyashaGinSan]

Not really, she can instant cast.

 

[Davidliteral]

-snip-

"As of Volume 9, she can cast it without chanting." OP is Volume 3 since VSbattle forbid stomp matches so her key's tone down, I had no choice. One explosion still can't bypass Totem of Undyings. Especially her explosion spell drains a lot of her damage. Did even you watch this video?

Time of Incantation or Casting =/= Summoning Explosion Instantly without delay

simultaneously causality or instant summoning

Ender Dragon's AP is Town Level can only deal 1-2 hp damage to Steve w/ full set of max enchanted diamond armor. 1-2 damage? That's very low. In Steve's profile doesn't include this kind of information, so don't just trust Tiering of AP when you didn't even see the deeper meaning of it. Steve is a lot more powerful than the bosses in-game, is why the Ender Dragon and Wither farm existed because they can exploited.

Also OP, myself, can't vote. But Fire resistance makes him immune to fire and Notch apple makes him more durable while Explosion protection IV enchantment is double the amount of resistance against explosions compare to Protection IV enchantment. see

 

[ShiroyashaGinSan]

No, in Megumin spin-offs, she can do it already from day one. Also this is stomp if Explosion can't do shit, literally everything else is OOC and she's literally a glass cannon.

 

[Ecstasy_Amphetamine]

I just read her profile, and she has resistance to teleportation? What does that even mean?

 

[ShiroyashaGinSan]

Teleportation based BFR.

 

[Davidliteral]

So there's no point to continue this battle, huh, ok.

 

[Wokistan]

The totem's durability should also be Steve's duraviliry at most though. Not sure how well it works if it gets blown up along with him.

 

[Davidliteral]

Even by your logic, an explosion gets him blown up along with totem of undying while totem of undying will instantly resurrect him. The totem of undying disappear after use.

"The totem's durability should also be Steve's duraviliry at most though." Are you making a rule for yourself? That's not how it works. @Saikou really need to see this though. It doesn't destroyed by explosion or melted, Steve carried them anywhere and anytime. Totem of Undyings is made of unknown materials so you can't assume they're same durability as Steve, there's nothing notable about it except he just carries there. You have to show a proof that they were destroyed by explosion or interacted with explosion. But it doesn't. Additionally gamemechanic doesn't prove anything, they just lack interaction, Developers doesn't care about it though.

"held/carried" items =/= "dropped" items

The only evidence of totem of undying interacted with something was the void itself. Steve in survival mode had shown can resist the void while eating Notch Apple, the each one Notch Apple gives him 30 seconds survivability in the void. Notch Apple's secondary canon, it can't be crafted thus it's made of unknown materials, it's primary canon (the recipe can be crafted with gold blocks and apple) was still irrelevant though.

Void in-game >>>>>> Explosion in-game

To clarify I added "in-game" because it's not all around resistance nor drawing a conclusion of how "resistance isn't durability" (furthermore totem of undyings doesn't interact with the explosion in-game), though it's all about how they are built in the game. I meant all of items interaction with the environment in the game. They instantly destroyed, just like cactus, by this logic it'd be like Steve carries diamond then suddenly a random weak explosion exploded near him aftermath his diamond was gone now (Steve's now despair afterwards), so it's contradictory. The consistent gamemechanics was the Void has same interaction with items just like Explosion, Cactus, Lava, and etc. Therefore "same as durability as him" and "explosion should destroy the (held) items" doesn't work.

Also just like I said before, Tiering of AP/Dura can't be easily trusted. I knew you only made a conclusion by you just take Steve's dura as equivalent to Totem of Undying's dura... Burden of proof fallacy.

Don't Mind This Rant LMFAO

In narrative games like Undertale uses plot to make the game's gamemechanics a "gamemechanics canon" because they're part of the plot, so I think VSbattle's Game Mechanics rules only applied to narrative games (I think they should add rules about non-linear/non-narrative games to the page). Using IRL logic to Minecraft while they have contradictories from the game, as they don't make sense to both "equivalence" and "comparison", the conclusions along with contradictories are thrown out. By the way before you draw a conclusion of how gamemechanics are non-canon, there's difference between gamemechanics canon and gamemechanics fallacy on how they were "interpreted" from "equivalance" and they should be consistent from "comparison". So if both "equivalance" and "comparison" are true then they are classified as gamemechanics canon to the game like Minecraft, sandbox game. This kind of contradictories gives me a headache, just like this guy we're arguing how between the "hardness" and "blast resistance" which one is gamemechanics fallacy. (Edit: Lol I write essay what the f-. I was hoping you should ignore some of them if it has nothing to do with it and you shouldn't criticize all of the paragraphs above if they aren't necessary. Though I'm making a bookmark of my comments and my other previous comments so I couldn't forget them and add to my knowledge base.)

 

[Apatheticskell]

If Steve has his trident he might stand a chance.

 

[GyroNutz]

I have so many questions

 

[Davidliteral]

?

 

[GyroNutz]

Did I say something odd?

 

[Davidliteral]

-snip-

No, just do write a question.

 

[GyroNutz]

7-B vs 7-C... why?

 

[Davidliteral]

-snip-

I dunno. I made it because I want to see what other people think about it and who'd win... It seems profiles really lack information so most people relies on the profile itself. And it seems bad - I beginning to notice some people from vsbattle "only" rely on the character profiles plus the lack of information/description of the character profiles, this might be the reason and I can see the hates on vsbattle from the outside of wikia, look at the comment sectio.

Megumin's durability and striking strength still doesn't make sense.