• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Message from Emperorj7

Messages
38
Reaction score
0
The term itself is an oxymorn. A platonic concept's literal point is to be the truest and perfect form of a concept and you can say it is above truth as well. To say that there is a version of this that is "false" is really idioc since it contradicts what platonic concept is. Some people also ask for proof of it being a "true platonic concept" as if that wouldn't be asking to prove a negative. If it is stated to be a platonic concept, that statement holds enough validity and you can say it is a platonic concept. If you were to deny this, you would have to prove why it is not or provide contradictions. But yeah, my main point is that a "false platonic concept" doesn't exist and to say that it isn't true, would mean it isn't a platonic concept at all.
 
Bump, even though this has been said before, it's good to have people address it since eventually it will become a rule that way.
 
Back
Top