• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

One-Punch Man: Giant Meteor Size

Status
Not open for further replies.
17,946
15,575
The Giant Meteor from One-Punch Man is currently accepted to have a length of 200 meters based on the One-Punch Man Hero Encyclopedia databook. I believe this size to be inaccurate.

The meteor only being 200 meters long is just blatantly ridiculous of several reasons. The first of which being its depiction.

In various panels, we see the meteor compared to objects with specific sizes. First is the meteor compared to a satellite. Satellites of this type are typically about 100 meters wide. Despite this, the satellite is only as large as the small meteorites near the meteor, which are much smaller than the meteor itself. We also see the meteor compared to buildings in Z-City. The meteor is consistently drawn and depicted to be far larger than buildings that have several tens of stories. It only being 200 meters tall doesn't line up with this. This added on the fact that the Hero Encyclopedia databook is treated as secondary canon means that the 200 meter figure should definitely be questioned at the very least.

Next we have statements and logic. The meteor is constantly referred to as huge, overwhelmingly massive, and other synonymous terms, as well as having multiple statements of its impact being capable of wiping out Z-City and surrounding towns. This is important because if the meteor was only 200 meters long, its impact would only have "local damage to the impact area," which we know isn't the case, with a more accurate depiction of the meteor's impact being the 'over one or two kilometers' description of its impact having "have worldwide effects," and this leads into my next point.

I believe that we should remove the 200 meter size for the meteor, and instead use this accepted calc, which places the meteor's length closer to the 'over one or two kilometer' description from NASA. Another reason I believe this calc to be accurate is due to the fact that the meteor's new Kinetic Energy is far closer to the already accepted and used calc for the destruction of Z-City from @ByAsura (105 Gigatons vs 805 Gigatons) compared to the current Kinetic Energy using the 200 meter figure of around 73 Megatons.

If accepted, this doesn't change any profiles other than the Giant Meteor's profile itself, changing its Large Size from Type 2 to Type 3.
 
Where are you seeing 100 m on there?
We also see the meteor compared to buildings in Z-City. The meteor is consistently drawn and depicted to be far larger than buildings that have several tens of stories.
Most of thsoe are not good shots of the buildings in comparison to the meteor. We also see Saitama in comparison to the meteor on that panel.

Those terms would apply to a 200 meter meteor, no problem.

s well as having multiple statements of its impact being capable of wiping out Z-City and surrounding towns. This is important because if the meteor was only 200 meters long, its impact would only have "local damage to the impact area," which we know isn't the case, with a more accurate depiction of the meteor's impact being the 'over one or two kilometers' description of its impact having "have worldwide effects," and this leads into my next point.
That doesn't inherently require the meteorite to be bigger; just for it to have more destructive capability.
 
Where are you seeing 100 m on there?
The solar panels extend 50 meters. There are solar panels on each side of the satellite.
We also see Saitama in comparison to the meteor on that panel.
Saitama is clearly drawn in that panel to show his location, rather than size. This is proven by literally every other panel of the meteor and the fact that Saitama being able to be seem doesn't make sense.
Those terms would apply to a 200 meter meteor, no problem.
This was in conjuncture with the other half of the sentence.
That doesn't inherently require the meteorite to be bigger; just for it to have more destructive capability.
Could you elaborate on this?
 
The solar panels extend 50 meters. There are solar panels on each side of the satellite.
Noted, but the source does also say "Some communication satellites are about 7 m long and have solar panels that extend another 50 m." Meaning the satellite from the manga may not be that size.

The International Space Station which is our IRL largest satellite is 109 metres long and 75 metres wide apparently.

Could you elaborate on this?
The meteor's energy isn't necessarily just derived from its size, but from density and speed also which would impact how much of an area it would destroy.
 
Noted, but the source does also say "Some communication satellites are about 7 m long and have solar panels that extend another 50 m." Meaning the satellite from the manga may not be that size.
The satellite itself (the middle part) is 7 meter bit, while the solar panels are the 50 meter long each.
The meteor's energy isn't necessarily just derived from its size, but from density and speed also which would impact how much of an area it would destroy.
Yes I realize that, but the calc itself also takes into account the density of meteors as well as the speed of ablation.
 
200 meters is more in-line with Saitama's size in comparison to it, but really it doesn't ultimately matter since we're already scaling it to a higher value.

Though like Damage said the meteor being 200 meters doesn't impact anything if you just assume it's moving at a notably faster rate.
 
200 meters is more in-line with Saitama's size in comparison to it, but really it doesn't ultimately matter since we're already scaling it to a higher value.

Though like Damage said the meteor being 200 meters doesn't impact anything if you just assume it's moving at a notably faster rate.
So what are your thoughts on the OP?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top