Possible 2-A better description?

[Aeyu]

Would it be a good idea to give 2-A a better description like was done with 1-A?

To something like "Greater Multiverse", or something reminiscent?

 

[Cropfist]

?

 

[Aeyu]

Before, 1-A was Hyperverse+ and High Hyperverse+ level for lack of better terminology until the admins decided on "Outerversal", as a better alternative. 2-A follows this same pattern.

 

[Promestein]

1-A is vastly different from 1-B, so it's not super accurate to just add a plus sign.

2-A is just 2-B but bigger.

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

Multiverse+ is fine as it is. It be a rather arduous and pointless effort to edit every 2-A character. Plus, it could clash with our term for High 2-A, "High Multiverse".

 

[The_real_cal_howard]

Yeah. It does mess with tiers high 2-A, and all three parts of 1-C

 

[Aeyu]

How would that affect 1-C though? A greater multiverse is not necessarily a complex one.

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

Well, Tier Low 1-C to High 1-C are still based on Multiverse theory albeit String Theory Multiverses. As Prom mentioned, 1-A is a much different concept than Hyperspace so it only made sense for it to get a different name.

 

[Aeyu]

I agree fully, but my method of thinking was more along the line of the fact that 2-A is a greater (transfinite) number of sum universes in its totality, and High 2-A is an even greater number than that (being infinite, or 5-D)

 

[BreloomFanboy]

Greater Multiverse... isn't that basically Multiverse+

 

[Aeyu]

Generally speaking, yes. But that's the same as the whole Hyperverse+ thing. I would argue that Outerverse pretty much is the same as Hyperverse+, just a more accurate description.