• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Pre-existing Void

Messages
239
Reaction score
43
Hello, I heard somewhere that if a void existed prior to a Type 1 concept or acted as its origin, it would be considered 1-A or something similar. Is that true?
 
No, the concept type 1 should be strictly concept of dimensionality, space-time. Not every concepts
 
No, the concept type 1 should be strictly concept of dimensionality, space-time. Not every concepts
Ok, I take it as yes. as long they are concepts of space-time, can I ask the arguments for the Outerversal void, or why?
 
Last edited:
Depends on contexts.

Concept of dimensionality is the very abstract concept that ground dimensions, being type 1 mean the concept is universal, so the concept encompasses and ground all possible extension of dimensions, already make it Low 1-A at least. The void which is obviously a immaterial void of nothingness prior to the concept means it is a void that devoid of physicality, materiality and prior to a Low 1-A concept of dimensions make the void 1-A

If the concept is platonic-type concept then it is automatically 1-A, the void will just upscales from it

But this is just general explanation, it is still depend on the context in-verse
 
Should the type 1 concept encompasses all things it's represent in the verse?
 
Type 2 and 1 governs everything under it influence, like concept type 1/2 of love will govern universal love, concept of chair will governs every chair in the verse, etc.......
 
Type 2 and 1 governs everything under it influence, like concept type 1/2 of love will govern universal love, concept of chair will governs every chair in the verse, etc.......
But didn't we put that not all Type 1 concepts are Outerversal, except when they governs everything in the verse
 
You can have type 2 concepts that governs single universe with out entire verse
Bro, universal here doesn't mean universe, it means it mean everything within the verse, be universe, multiverse, omniverse. Universal Love is every Love in the verse, Universal Chair is all chair in the world, etc...
 
Bro, universal here doesn't mean universe, it means it mean everything within the verse, be universe, multiverse, omniverse. Universal Love is every Love in the verse, Universal Chair is all chair in the world, etc...
I know what you are trying to refer, but what I meant is conceptual manipulation1/2 doesn't require to cover the entirety of the the verse
 
Back
Top