Question about string theory/gurren lagann

[Swordsaint456]

In the cosmology page it states this

the universes of multiverse are 10 to 11-dimensional universes restricted to membranes (branes), so it does follows the string theory and the extra dimensions are not happened to be compactified at planck-length and do trivialized the lower dimensions since it has the usage of brane cosmology.

why is this the case? could someone explain

 

[Qawsedf234]

why is this the case?

I guess as like a simple explanation:

• String Dimensions are like mono-dimensional alignments of atoms that are very small. Which is why string dimensions don't give you a higher AP rating, as they're not of significant size
• A Brane is a bulk space containing a three dimensional or greater space within itself. So a Brane of higher scale will be physical "larger" than one of lower scale by the Tiering System.

The page is basically saying that the dimensional axis used in Gurren Lagann would could as larger geometric spaces and useable for High 1-C.

 

[Swordsaint456]

I guess as like a simple explanation:

• String Dimensions are like mono-dimensional alignments of atoms that are very small. Which is why string dimensions don't give you a higher AP rating, as they're not of significant size
• A Brane is a bulk space containing a three dimensional or greater space within itself. So a Brane of higher scale will be physical "larger" than one of lower scale by the Tiering System.

The page is basically saying that the dimensional axis used in Gurren Lagann would could as larger geometric spaces and useable for High 1-C.

so since the strings are in the larger space they would therefore be larger, and then be viable for High 1-C?

 

[Qawsedf234]

since the strings are in the larger space they would therefore be larger,

No, strings are small. A Brane is a type of bulk space that embeds spaces within it. It's why 11-D string dimensions aren't High 1-C but an 11-D Brane dimension would be.

 

[Swordsaint456]

No, strings are small. A Brane is a type of bulk space that embeds spaces within it. It's why 11-D string dimensions aren't High 1-C but an 11-D Brane dimension would be.

im a bit confused still

 

[Causalist]

So string theory isn't enough for a higher tier
Neither is a brane cosmology

But combining the two grants High 1-C?

 

[Compsito]

I certainly also have confusion on this topic.

 

[Qawsedf234]

Neither is a brane cosmology

Brane cosmology is on its own. Since, to simplify it, its a smaller space embedded in a much larger space. Like a sheet of paper being stored in a box.

 

[Causalist]

Brane cosmology is on its own. Since, to simplify it, its a smaller space embedded in a much larger space. Like a sheet of paper being stored in a box.

So brane cosmology is inherently 11 or 12D by itself, while string theory means nothing. Do we have a page for its qualifiers?

 

[Qawsedf234]

So brane cosmology is inherently 11 or 12D by itself, while string theory means nothing.

Brane Cosmology is inherently superior, as in a 4th dimensional plane is trans-infinitely greater than a 3rd dimensional plane. Its not automatically 11D unless you can prove there are 11-Dimensions.

Do we have a page for its qualifiers?

You can gleam it from the FAQ, but nothing is explicit to my knowledge. You just have to know the concepts.

 

[Causalist]

Brane Cosmology is inherently superior, as in a 4th dimensional plane is trans-infinitely greater than a 3rd dimensional plane. Its not automatically 11D unless you can prove there are 11-Dimensions.

...as would be the case in a cosmology that operates under string theory (?)

 

[Qawsedf234]

...as would be the case in a cosmology that operates under string theory (?)

String Dimensions aren't inherently superior, as there isn't a transinfinite difference present. They're just lines of atoms that are bending into higher dimensional angels.

 

[Causalist]

Then I really don't know what this means anymore. I interpreteted that as a confirmation that Gurren Lagann cosmology is High 1-C because of string theory granting the verse 11 dimensions while its brane cosmology makes it so that those 11 dimensions are inherently superior to each other on a trans-infinite level. Am I not understanding this correctly? What else could this possibly mean?

 

[Causalist]

Bump. Still confused

 

[Qawsedf234]

Bump. Still confused

No you got the logic down with this part

interpreteted that as a confirmation that Gurren Lagann cosmology is High 1-C because of string theory granting the verse 11 dimensions while its brane cosmology makes it so that those 11 dimensions are inherently superior to each other on a trans-infinite level

This is the summarization of the logic.

 

[Causalist]

No you got the logic down with this part

This is the summarization of the logic.

Oh. I must have misunderstood your response then. Thank you