Question about the dimensional tiering

[Overlord775]

So, destroying a 3-D universe is rated at 3-A

meanwhile

Destroying a 3-D universe + time is rated at Low 2-C

So what would destroying a 2-D universe + time be rated at ?

 

[ZacharyGrossman273]

Uh


Wait


Is this about bill?

 

[Overlord775]

No, it's just a thought that came to my mind

 

[Antvasima]

I do not know. Sorry,

 

[Overlord775]

I do not know. Sorry,

What's the point of this comment ?

I don't want to offend you or anything, but if you don't have anything to say, don't say anything.

 

[Antvasima]

I tend to reply to almost every thread that I notice here.

Anyway, our tiering system is not built for handling the sort of scenario that you described, so I doubt that anybody can answer the question.

 

[RRTheEndMan]

Probably it just means you have 3d power

 

[ShiroyashaGinSan]

Time Destruction is still Low 2-C. You're still destroying 4-D anyway.

 

[RKGenki]

Time Destruction is still Low 2-C. You're still destroying 4-D anyway.

No, time isn't 4-D. It's only one dimension by itself

 

[ShiroyashaGinSan]

I assumed that 3-D still is the 3-D by our universe. If 3-D here doesn't exist, I say it's 3-A.

 

[Sera_EX]

There's no such thing as a two-dimensional universe.

 

[Sera_EX]

At any rate. 2 + 1D = 3D, that's 10-C unless more information is presented.

 

[RRTheEndMan]

do we know the lenght of a second? If yes it would be possible to know the 3-d volume of the timespace universe with a known age and size right?

 

[Overlord775]

There's no such thing as a two-dimensional universe.

Fiction doesn't care about logic tho