- 196
- 26
I've been back and forth on where I think Naruto scales because of some misconceptions people may have, so I'd like to bounce some things off and get some more opinions.
So first, one of the misconceptions I come across the most is:
One of the main things i sees are people arguing that these dimensions are full-blown worlds, and I even see claims that they are small separate space-times themselves.
But I see that as them not understanding that there are multiple ways the term "Dimension" can be used in fiction. For example, the term "Dimension" can be used in the following ways in fiction:
And in the case of people who are trying to claim that Kaguya is universal because of the "Dimensions," they are confusing "Dimension" with Universe or Space-Time.
Dimension vs Timeline: Timelines are temporal necessities for a universe to function, no matter the dimensionality. Timelines are NOT dimensions. For a timeline to exist, there needs to be at least a 1-D plane, but that in no way means every dimension has a space-time.
Anyway, moving on.
People also argue that Kaguya Ōtsutsuki is universal because she can create, manipulate, and destroy multiple space-time dimensions.
First of all creation of multiple 3-D constructs doesn't make you 4-D, and the same thing goes for the other two claims.
Second of all, in no way does it state that each dimension is its own space-time, so that argument is completely garbage.
Other arguments point out the stars and planets in some dimensions.
Well, there are 8 planets in our solar system, 1 star, and there are over 950 natural satellite moons as well. I get that DC isn't the same as AP, but still. it wouldn't give her anywhere near the capability to be galaxy, much less universal.
For example, our galaxy contains an estimated 100-400 billion stars, and let's assume there are an average of 7 planets per star. That's at least 700-Billion planets. The galaxy contains an estimated. It's an incredible stretch to claim she is galaxy, much less universal.
Anyway, that's all I wanted to say. Let me know your take.
So first, one of the misconceptions I come across the most is:
Kaguya Ōtsutsuki's Dimensions.
One of the main things i sees are people arguing that these dimensions are full-blown worlds, and I even see claims that they are small separate space-times themselves.
But I see that as them not understanding that there are multiple ways the term "Dimension" can be used in fiction. For example, the term "Dimension" can be used in the following ways in fiction:
- Parallel/Mirror World
- Pocket Dimension
- Spiritual/Astral Realms
- The In-Between Dimension
And in the case of people who are trying to claim that Kaguya is universal because of the "Dimensions," they are confusing "Dimension" with Universe or Space-Time.
Dimension vs Timeline: Timelines are temporal necessities for a universe to function, no matter the dimensionality. Timelines are NOT dimensions. For a timeline to exist, there needs to be at least a 1-D plane, but that in no way means every dimension has a space-time.
Anyway, moving on.
People also argue that Kaguya Ōtsutsuki is universal because she can create, manipulate, and destroy multiple space-time dimensions.
First of all creation of multiple 3-D constructs doesn't make you 4-D, and the same thing goes for the other two claims.
Second of all, in no way does it state that each dimension is its own space-time, so that argument is completely garbage.
Other arguments point out the stars and planets in some dimensions.
Well, there are 8 planets in our solar system, 1 star, and there are over 950 natural satellite moons as well. I get that DC isn't the same as AP, but still. it wouldn't give her anywhere near the capability to be galaxy, much less universal.
For example, our galaxy contains an estimated 100-400 billion stars, and let's assume there are an average of 7 planets per star. That's at least 700-Billion planets. The galaxy contains an estimated. It's an incredible stretch to claim she is galaxy, much less universal.
Anyway, that's all I wanted to say. Let me know your take.