• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Question about Type 3 concept

Messages
13
Reaction score
10
What does "merely on a more specific scale" refer to?
  • There could be multiple objects that are similar (eg: multiple chair) but the concept (of chair) only governs a single one.
  • There is only one object (chair) that exists in the entire reality and concept (of chair) governs that single object (chair).
  • Or something has multiple aspects (physical, non-physical) and the concept only governs a particular aspect.
 
Concepts that govern unique existence or existences.

Even if there's only one planet in the world, the concept of planets is still acting over all reality, making it Type 2.

But if there's a concept that exists solely for your sword, that would be Type 3. A physical concept that governs itself would count as well.
 
But if there's a concept that exists solely for your sword, that would be Type 3. A physical concept that governs itself would count as well.
What happen when the "concept of a particular sword " also exhibits the property of being independent of that particular sword. Usually the concept are shoved to type 3 when their properties aren't explained in the story to warrant a higher type right? so what happens in above case.
 
What happen when the "concept of a particular sword " also exhibits the property of being independent of that particular sword. Usually the concept are shoved to type 3 when their properties aren't explained in the story to warrant a higher type right? so what happens in above case.
Type 3 has nothing to do with independence or not; it's just about whether it's focused on a specific thing. It can have Type 2 or Type 1 Traits beyond that.
 
it's just about whether it's focused on a specific thing.
So it's something like the 3rd point in the OP?
Like sword as a whole is a particular of its own but "my sword" and "your sword" would be a specific aspect of an already whole object/particular.
 
So it's something like the 3rd point in the OP?
Like sword as a whole is a particular of its own but "my sword" and "your sword" would be a specific aspect of an already whole object/particular.
Not sure what your saying.
 
So it's something like the 3rd point in the OP?
Like sword as a whole is a particular of its own but "my sword" and "your sword" would be a specific aspect of an already whole object/particular.
Is this mgk?
 
Back
Top