- 6,738
- 1,839
Im just curious of this is enough evidence to suggest a reality fiction difference
The evidence is this
All matter/atoms in the universe is formed by the interconnectedness of all "living" things and the future is built upon the accumulation of the totality of the causality of all matter in the universe. The interconnectedness of matter.
"may each think up a fresh ontology, but any one of them too will be no more than a scene in the mind. Yet certainly these landscapes recorded here" this statement
Stars are simply thoughts, and galaxies are a collection of thoughts
The most fundamental form of the universe is nothingness, shunyata, and a world of onesd where there is no distinction between anything.
The most fundamental form of reality can only be seen or achieved by achieving a higher state of consciousness
Is this enough to suggest a reality fiction difference?
And is the nothingness being directly the cause of universal expansion an anti feat?
The evidence is this
All matter/atoms in the universe is formed by the interconnectedness of all "living" things and the future is built upon the accumulation of the totality of the causality of all matter in the universe. The interconnectedness of matter.
"may each think up a fresh ontology, but any one of them too will be no more than a scene in the mind. Yet certainly these landscapes recorded here" this statement
Stars are simply thoughts, and galaxies are a collection of thoughts
The most fundamental form of the universe is nothingness, shunyata, and a world of onesd where there is no distinction between anything.
The most fundamental form of reality can only be seen or achieved by achieving a higher state of consciousness
Is this enough to suggest a reality fiction difference?
And is the nothingness being directly the cause of universal expansion an anti feat?
