- 20,053
- 10,831
Alright, this has been bugging me for some time. So the resistance negation page needs a bit of a rework. The page itself mentions how RN can essentially bypass natural resistances which is true, however what I believe it should have, is the fact that the specific types of resistances you negate needs to be specified.
For example, if I have an onscreen feat of being able to deal damage to a being naturally immune to fire with fire, of course that would count as resistance negation. However if that’s all there is too the RN and there’s no mentions, no lore or any additional abilities to indicate the Resistance negation can lead to negging other types of resistance that has no onscreen showings like Mind or Soul resistance, this will lead to NLF territory. It also doesn’t really help when a decent chunk of pages on the site just have resistance negation listed but don’t elaborate on what resistances exactly it negates.
My proposition is that we should add in the page that the specific types of RN that’s proven/shown needs to be mentioned otherwise it will lead to a big NLF to assume someone can negate all resistances. This also applies to every page that has resistance negation as they need to specify what it is they negate to begin with.
Agree: 16 (DragonEmperor23, Overlord775, Mister6ame6, Antoniofer, Rabbit2002, AKM sama, Qawsedf234, Ogbunabali, Antvasima, Damage3245, LordGriffon1000, Elizhaa, DarkDragonMedeus, Bobsican, The Axiom of Virgo, Delta333)
Disagree:
Neutral:
For example, if I have an onscreen feat of being able to deal damage to a being naturally immune to fire with fire, of course that would count as resistance negation. However if that’s all there is too the RN and there’s no mentions, no lore or any additional abilities to indicate the Resistance negation can lead to negging other types of resistance that has no onscreen showings like Mind or Soul resistance, this will lead to NLF territory. It also doesn’t really help when a decent chunk of pages on the site just have resistance negation listed but don’t elaborate on what resistances exactly it negates.
My proposition is that we should add in the page that the specific types of RN that’s proven/shown needs to be mentioned otherwise it will lead to a big NLF to assume someone can negate all resistances. This also applies to every page that has resistance negation as they need to specify what it is they negate to begin with.
Agree: 16 (DragonEmperor23, Overlord775, Mister6ame6, Antoniofer, Rabbit2002, AKM sama, Qawsedf234, Ogbunabali, Antvasima, Damage3245, LordGriffon1000, Elizhaa, DarkDragonMedeus, Bobsican, The Axiom of Virgo, Delta333)
Disagree:
Neutral:
Last edited: