Shinobu Oshino's AP revision

[PrettyFearMachine]

Apparently there's a statement in Monogatari, which implies that Shinobu can destroy the planet.

"Well, doing away with a shrine might be not enough of a miracle -- but 'twas a sufficient display of power. Though if I truly made use of my power, it would be the earth I could make disappear, not a simple shrine."

I propose changing her Kiss-Shot Ace-whatever key's tier to "At least Low 6-B, possibly 5-B".

EDIT: Apparently Kiss-shot's feat was recalced at "Country level+", so her tier should actually be "At least 6-B, possibly 5-B".

 

[Agnaa]

I'm neutral on this change, for now.

 

[-BANLK-]

I agree with the changes.

 

[-BANLK-]

Ronny is planet level for a similar reasoning.

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

Blanc also has a "possibly 5-B" rating which comes from a single weapon's description.

 

[-BANLK-]

Iirc Shinobu had also stated that she could run across the whole planet in a second or something (Someone should clarify this since my memory is not that strong).

 

[Agnaa]

Iirc Shinobu had also stated that she could run across the whole planet in a second or something (Someone should clarify this since my memory is not that strong).

I don't remember seeing this, but you have known about a few untranslated novel things (such as human Shinobu) before I have. Given the scale of the series I wouldn't be surprised if she had that sort of statement. I'll add it to the profile if I ever see it.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

Bump before Agnaa wakes up.

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

 

[Mr. Bambu]

whatever shit I like

 

[-BANLK-]

Bump.

 

[VoidGoji]

A "possibly 5-B" rating seems plausible

 

[DMUA]

Eh probably

The Low 6-B feat is probably higher, but I'd need to figure out Antarctica in all of it's stuff in order to really tackle it

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

Eh probably
The Low 6-B feat is probably higher, but I'd need to figure out Antarctica in all of it's stuff in order to really tackle it

The issue is that the light novel says that Antarctica was almost destroyed, so only the ice part of it was taken into account, for safety's sake.

But you can go ahead and try to recalc it if you want.

 

[Agnaa]

Eh probably

The Low 6-B feat is probably higher, but I'd need to figure out Antarctica in all of it's stuff in order to really tackle it

I've done a recalc of it which takes into account the proper masses and fragmentation values, but I'm sticking with Low 6-B since it was "almost destroyed" from that jump, not completely fragmented over the entire landmass.

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

@Agnaa

What results did the recalc give you? Maybe we could arrange something like this:

"At least Small Country level to Your recalc, possibly Planet level"?

 

[DMUA]

It doesn't even have a calc on the page

If I got the radius of Antarctica, we could probably use near total fatalities to estimate the results

 

[Agnaa]

@Agnaa

What results did the recalc give you? Maybe we could arrange something like this:

"At least Small Country level to Your recalc, possibly Planet level"?

1.14e23 joules, Country level.

Quick, dirty, and messy calc writeup here​

apparently arctic ice has a fragmentation value of 1.8J/cc Antarctica's average altitude is 2.5km, and the ice sheet has an average height of 1.9km, meaning landmass has an average height of 0.6km apparently the land mass should have a fragmentation value of 8 J/cc Antarctica has an area of 14,000,000 km^2 8,400,000 km^3 of land, 26,600,000 km^3 of ice 8.4e21 cm^3 of land, 2.6e22 cm^3 of ice 6.72e22 joules for the land 4.68e22 joules for the ice 1.14e23 joules in total

 

[Agnaa]

It doesn't even have a calc on the page

If I got the radius of Antarctica, we could probably use near total fatalities to estimate the results

This is the calc that gave Low 6-B. Using near total fatalities sounds like a good way of going about it.

 

[DMUA]

Yeah, it would better reflect nearly destroying it.

Of course, as per getting the radius of Antarctica

 

[Agnaa]

Yeah, it would better reflect nearly destroying it.

Of course, as per getting the radius of Antarctica

Apparently The shortest radius is 1500km, and the largest is 3000km.

Sample mathematics questions (for school exams and such) seem to put the radius of Antarctica at around 2000km-2100km.

 

[DMUA]

Hmm

Alright

((1500/.28)^3)/2 is 76872266763.848 Kilotons, 76.8722667638483 Teratons, Country level+

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

((1500/.28)^3)/2 is 76872266763.848 Kilotons, 76.8722667638483 Teratons, Country level+

Nice. Now, can you put that in a blog?

 

[DMUA]

Ehhhhh

I'm lazy and this isn't my verse so I'll gladly let Agnaa steal the credit

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

I'll do it then ovo

 

[Agnaa]

TOO LATE

(Also DMUA can you respond here again?)

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

TOO LATE

 

[Agnaa]

now you post it on the calc evaluations thread

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

Your wish is my command

 

[PrettyFearMachine]

Alright, so if the calc gets accepted, then the rating is going to be "At least 6-B, possibly 5-B", right?

 

[-BANLK-]

For her full powered version, yes.

 

[Agnaa]

Yep.

 

[Agnaa]

Bump.

 

[-BANLK-]

I think the changes can be applied since two staff members have approved of it.

 

[Antvasima]

You should preferably ask some administrators and discussion moderators to comment here.

 

[KLOL506]

TOO LATE

HOW DARE YOU USE THIS ABOMINATION ON THIS THREAD.

WE DO NOT SPEAK OF DONTE

 

[KLOL506]

Regardless, looks good.

 

[Antvasima]

You should preferably ask some administrators and discussion moderators to comment here.

See here: VS Battles Staff

 

[AKM sama]

Is the translation legit? If it is, are we sure this is not just a textbook hyperbole?

I would prefer the current rating of "likely far higher" given the justification on the page and this statement, but I don't mind a possibly planet level rating if the statement is not hyperbole.