Some L1A questions

[AlipheeseXIV]

1. Say a character has multiple statements of being beyond dimensions (with these dimensions being mathematical/spatial), what would be some antifeats that would result in the character not qualifying for L1A in spite of the evidence?

2. Can L1A have layers? And if so, does it function the same as 1A with it's layers revolving around R>F? (Last I checked R>F was 1A so I'm unsure how exactly the layers would function)

3. Say Realm A is L1A, Realm B is infinitely larger than Realm A, but Realm C is also infinitely larger than Realm B and has a statement of R>F, as well as multiple statements of inaccessibility without transcendence for the inhabitants of Realm B. Would the R>F for Realm C be valid here even if it's just the single statement and support of inaccessibility or would it need greater evidence?

 

[SweetDao]

Say a character has multiple statements of being beyond dimensions (with these dimensions being mathematical/spatial), what would be some antifeats that would result in the character not qualifying for L1A in spite of the evidence?

Unless I'm mistaken, without further evidence (or context that you didn't develop here) I would just assume BDE 1 at most. I don't know if you would really count that as an antifeat tho.

Although, if we assume that the character in question is still dimensionally describable (like saying he's a higher being of the 5th dimension for example) it would be pretty damning unless explained in-verse. Antifeat are really context-dependant so it's hard to give you an accurate answer.

Can L1A have layers? And if so, does it function the same as 1A with it's layers revolving around R>F? (Last I checked R>F was 1A so I'm unsure how exactly the layers would function)

Yes. Layers functions like how you get Low 1-A in the first place. Meaning you need to higher realm/stronger character to be inaccessible to the composition of the lower Low 1-A structure without transcending it in a qualitative manner.

Say Realm A is L1A, Realm B is infinitely larger than Realm A, but Realm C is also infinitely larger than Realm B and has a statement of R>F, as well as multiple statements of inaccessibility without transcendence for the inhabitants of Realm B. Would the R>F for Realm C be valid here even if it's just the single statement and support of inaccessibility or would it need greater evidence?

I think that getting an "infinitely bigger" statement above a L1A realm is really weird in the first place but maybe I don't have the vision. I don't think Realm C would qualify if it's "merely infinitely bigger" in comparison to the other realms. even with statement of inaccessibility.

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

Unless I'm mistaken, without further evidence (or context that you didn't develop here) I would just assume BDE 1 at most. I don't know if you would really count that as an antifeat tho.

Well assuming that "beyond dimensions" referred to actually being beyond them, not just different or being dimensionless.

Although, if we assume that the character in question is still dimensionally describable (like saying he's a higher being of the 5th dimension for example) it would be pretty damning unless explained in-verse. Antifeat are really context-dependant so it's hard to give you an accurate answer.

Fair enough.

Yes. Layers functions like how you get Low 1-A in the first place. Meaning you need to higher realm/stronger character to be inaccessible to the composition of the lower Low 1-A structure without transcending it in a qualitative manner.

So if they don't transcend it in a qualitative manner it's a layer of L1A but if they transcend it in a qualitative manner then...?

I think that getting an "infinitely bigger" statement above a L1A realm is really weird in the first place but maybe I don't have the vision. I don't think Realm C would qualify if it's "merely infinitely bigger" in comparison to the other realms. even with statement of inaccessibility.

Okay.

 

[Vietthai96]

If it is literal beyond dimensionality, then it could land you in 1-A, not just Low 1-A

Anti-feat is very context dependent unlike 1-A

 

[SweetDao]

So if they don't transcend it in a qualitative manner it's a layer of L1A but if they transcend it in a qualitative manner then...?

Then it's probably 1-A if no antifeat ig

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

If it is literal beyond dimensionality, then it could land you in 1-A, not just Low 1-A

Anti-feat is very context dependent unlike 1-A

Why would it be 1A instead of L1A?

Then it's probably 1-A if no antifeat ig

I see, well alright thanks.

 

[Vietthai96]

Why would it be 1A instead of L1A?

Because Low 1-A means you are still bound by dimensionality, just that you are so large that you have no dimensional limitation, encompass all possible dimensional size

1-A mean you beyond dimensionality altogether, beyond material composition

 

[SweetDao]

As Vietthai said

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

Because Low 1-A means you are still bound by dimensionality, just that you are so large that you have no dimensional limitation, encompass all possible dimensional size

1-A mean you beyond dimensionality altogether, beyond material composition

Was confused because the BDE page says that statements of being above dimensions are L1A, is this not the case anymore or something? Or is it just that both can necessarily be true?

 

[Vietthai96]

Was confused because the BDE page says that statements of being above dimensions are L1A, is this not the case anymore or something? Or is it just that both can necessarily be true?

It means beyond dimensions without further contexts. But for more information you need to read FAQ iirc

 

[AlipheeseXIV]

Yeah I'm kinda mulling over the FAQ but still have some problems understanding things here and there, I have a more general grasp now though so I'll just continue doing more research.