Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If this is given sufficient approval by other Staff & Knowledgeable Members, I'll be okay with it.Completing the Pokedex, (especially the NatDex), is an optional thing for every save file to do. Unless its PLA, you don't get anything significant or game-progressing by completing everything. You can but its not set or enforced to progress unlike playing the story.
Ergo thats why the selection of Pokemon if they were to be used in Versus Threads should be from an optional pool.
(Id personally prefer if it focused on the actual region-dex so we arent just giving that player access to mons they can only get from outside world-trades with metagaming aspects.)
I'm not sure we have so many users acting so problematically that we need to take measures as enforcing a rule. An informal mental guideline seems sufficient.Well i mean they're gone now so its whatever but their way of making profiles (and it just being accepted to run by their headcanons of 'whose the canon protag') is why i wanted to make this thread in the first place since i frequently got 'Make a CRT' as a response whenever i asked about things like this.
It doesnt need to be an enforced rule but it should definitely be a standard when we deal with Pokemon Protagonists. Unlike NPCs (excluding Red ig), these are cookie cutter player insert characters.
Reposting this quote of yours for context.The verse page thing doesnt have to be a rule, it can be a note. Admittedly i worded it as a rule so that it would be have to be followed by Sean, but since Sean is gone as the only person who was making protag profiles to their own design, I have no issues rebuking it. Its just to enforce the standard .
I'd have to find time to check this thread. Plus, no offense meant, but I'm not always able to find time for VSBW, plus, as a Thread Moderator, I am often asked to participate in other threads, & often wish to help in those threads, further cutting into my time.I mean you can, most of this thread is just the OP getting derailed and focusing on another aspect (since the main proposals of this thread like changing the names and making the profiles forced to focus on both protags interchangeably is uncontroversial to everyone except the guy that isnt allowed on the wiki anymore)
Given it's been almost a week & they've been brought up, I'll @ them here.They misunderstood/didnt read the OP and assumed from the current derailed convo that this was about compositing game mechanics or w/e for Pokemon when it wasnt. I linked the post they sent and all they talked about was regarding the discussion going onn at the time about how we treat the Pokedex.
The profiles already dont go over absolutely every possible pokemon a player character can get, but yeah, it would be down to options for them either way that would need to be specificed under any discussion thread (such as what pokemon theyre using). No point continuing to mislead people that absolutely everyPart C is the one I disagree with, yes.
Its not overturning anything. Masters doesnt get to decide which protag is the canon counterpart, it follows its own interpretation. As with any other series that has different interpretations and canons, they go in a separate profiles. Or at least they should but no one gives af about cleaning up the verse standards#A is partially trying to overturn a secondary canon CRT that was accepted as it is now, so yeah, anything trying to fully decanonize Masters is going to get the no from me. It's heavily restricted as is because of the fuckery surrounding it, but full decanonization is basically going against where Nintendo places it storywise.
Fully awareAnd please remember I'm not evaluation staff.
Do you want to write the note or should I? Because Standard Equipment is basically "yes but actually no" with PCs, hence my suggestion for a note like that.The profiles already dont go over absolutely every possible pokemon a player character can get, but yeah, it would be down to options for them either way that would need to be specificed under any discussion thread (such as what pokemon theyre using).
I know they were made before the Masters canon thing, lady. Why do you think I specifically said yes to the name change? Just use Masters as the Secondary Canon it is, it's really not hard to make the distinction between something that's contradicted and something that isn't.Its not overturning anything. Masters doesnt get to decide which protag is the canon counterpart, it follows its own interpretation. As with any other series that has different interpretations and canons, they go in a separate profiles
Idk how many times i gotta tell this to ppl but no matter how many times Sean had to keep coping to himself about that thread that Masters was 100% canon, and was telling everyone is now canon, it wasnt. The thread concludes that Masters content requires discussion to use, and was after the fact those profiles were made (and thats ignoring the fact people cant differentiate when people are writing a character to be faithful to their canon counterparts, not applying to their canon story). Its not Nintendo that decides its canon either way, its Gamefreak. Nintendo is the publisher.
I mean the thread needs to get passed first. The protagonist profiles either way should be converted to blogs until someone can fix it up to these standards. The Verse already deals with a ton of badly formatted profiles.Do you want to write the note or should I? Because Standard Equipment is basically "yes but actually no" with PCs, hence my suggestion for a note like that.
It is? Because its mixed in with a bunch of character/personality-based additions. You've got a mobile game that crosses over all the characters from after the events of their game (with timelines all jumbled and their own story events). Most of the character stuff is fine. but looking outwardly at all the Hoopa stuff they need to incorporate and the many, many contradictions to a 30 year+ mainline franchise in their unique storylines, then it isn't a cakewalk to understand the canon. You got about 10+ characters now who have been blessed by Arceus with a Sygna Suit that is all purely for selling gacha units.Just use Masters as the Secondary Canon it is, it's really not hard to make the distinction between something that's contradicted and something that isn't.
Don't ya mean ancient profiles? Cause that's the leading problem with them. Not saying I disagree with that though.I mean the thread needs to get passed first. The protagonist profiles either way should be converted to blogs until someone can fix it up to these standards. The Verse already deals with a ton of badly formatted profiles.
Okay so they have those in their optional equipment? Like I'm not sure what I'm supposed to respond with other than "Yeah treat it like this.", it's genuinely not hard to point at Masters and say "Secondary canon treat it like that", if they fight people who **** around with CT in the various stories, I guess they scale to the CT?It is? Because its mixed in with a bunch of character/personality-based additions. You've got a mobile game that crosses over all the characters from after the events of their game (with timelines all jumbled and their own story events). Most of the character stuff is fine. but looking outwardly at all the Hoopa stuff they need to incorporate and the many, many contradictions to a 30 year+ mainline franchise in their unique storylines, then it isn't a cakewalk to understand the canon. You got about 10+ characters now who have been blessed by Arceus with a Sygna Suit that is all purely for selling gacha units.
I'm gonna be FR, I don't really care about the stats here, but yeah most post-game PCs fight legendaries or CT. At that point there's scaling, whether it's big number or small number depends on the legendaries, and we really shouldn't care beyond htat.The only thing we should be counting on masters for is character portrayal and ignoring trying to make every character scale to the Creation Trio or whatever bs Sean was trying to sell. And none of that is hardly relevant to their actual stats.
Well there are lots of untouched ancient profiles that havent even been updated since PLArceus, but the Protagonist profiles we got mainly. the rest should get that Outdated Tabber box but thats only reserved if people are making an effort to change them as opposed to just letting general traffic know we're aware the profiles are flawed.Don't ya mean ancient profiles? Cause that's the leading problem with them. Not saying I disagree with that though.
You said you agreed with my 3rd point with OP, which is treating all those variables as optional equipment and not standard. So if you agree now then?Okay so they have those in their optional equipment? Like I'm not sure what I'm supposed to respond with other than "Yeah treat it like this.", it's genuinely not hard to point at Masters and say "Secondary canon treat it like that", if they fight people who **** around with CT in the various stories, I guess they scale to the CT?
Cool but thats all the player fighting these beings, and just because they can fight some people in the postgame (whose game 'levels' are superior to that of the legendaries, or they're post-fighting the box legends before the 8th gym) doesnt mean they all scale to that level. Thats literally what the latter of Sean's profiles kept trying to claim and say, and it was being allowed for whatever reason.I'm gonna be FR, I don't really care about the stats here, but yeah most post-game PCs fight legendaries or CT. At that point there's scaling, whether it's big number or small number depends on the legendaries, and we really shouldn't care beyond htat.
Your call on that.Well there are lots of untouched ancient profiles that havent even been updated since PLArceus, but the Protagonist profiles we got mainly. the rest should get that Outdated Tabber box but thats only reserved if people are making an effort to change them as opposed to just letting general traffic know we're aware the profiles are flawed.
Yeah Masters can be optional sure.You said you agreed with my 3rd point with OP, which is treating it as optional equipment and not standard. So if you agree now then?
You didn't convince me the other 15 times ya said this in a different way this thread. Like I said, it was solved in the first 3 pages, including this argument.Only people who directly fight the CT should scale at most (and even then theres a lot of game-mechanic related scaling, but theres at least arguments)
Cool but thats all the player fighting these beings, and just because they can fight some people in the postgame (whose game 'levels' are superior to that of the legendaries, or they're post-fighting the box legends before the 8th gym) doesnt mean they all scale to that level. Thats literally what the latter of Sean's profiles kept trying to claim and say, and it was being allowed for whatever reason.
So what, you think every trainer/pokemon that has a higher in-game base level should be scaled above the Creation Trio or something??? Im not tryna convince you of anything, its just blatantly obvious that game level isnt representative of their in-lore power, and just cause the player gets an option of fighting them after 'catching/beating' a legendary doesnt mean they scale to the in-lore power.You didn't convince me the other 15 times ya said this in a different way this thread. Like I said, it was solved in the first 3 pages, including this argument.
Mate levels don't matter but in basically every game since 4th generation theres been ways to get the CT either post-game or in the main story, so yeah, most of the post-game folks are gonna be scaling to the bullshit of CT. That isn't a problem.So what, you think every trainer/pokemon that has a higher in-game base level should be scaled above the Creation Trio or something??? Im not tryna convince you of anything, its just blatantly obvious that game level isnt representative of their in-lore power, and just cause the player gets an option of fighting them after 'catching/beating' a legendary doesnt mean they scale to the in-lore power.
Its literally confirmed that the creation trio are also surpressed/weaker while theyre captured in pokeballs. Its the entire point of the red chain
So you think just because someone can fight/catch the Creation Trio in a post-game (Top Tier legendaries in-lore) and can use them against post-game characters with no actual in-lore indication that they're a challenge or a struggle, that they should all scale? Unless theres an actual ante or power progression in these post-game stories that involve the CT specifically (not just including them to fill a quota, since it'd be a stupid decision not to let people access these pokemon outside their game), then no i dont see why we should be scaling people to a composited (this wiki composites the heck out of the CT from games such as Mystery Dungeon) CT just cause the player character has options to fight them.Mate levels don't matter but in basically every game since 4th generation theres been ways to get the CT either post-game or in the main story, so yeah, most of the post-game folks are gonna be scaling to the bullshit of CT. That isn't a problem.
sigh.So you think just because someone can fight/catch the Creation Trio in a post-game (Top Tier legendaries in-lore) and can use them against post-game characters with no actual in-lore indication that they're a challenge or a struggle, that they should all scale? Unless theres an actual ante or power progression in these post-game stories that involve the CT specifically (not just including them to fill a quota, since it'd be a stupid decision not to let people access these pokemon outside their game), then no i dont see why we should be scaling people to a composited (this wiki composites the heck out of the CT from games such as Mystery Dungeon) CT just cause the player character has options to fight them.
Even stuff like Wild Pokemon that you can catch that are beyond the level 45-50 the CT are put at?
Can you answer or not?sigh.
Do you have a new point, or are you going to repeat the same stuff said in the first 3 pages some more?
Other people answered this exact cookie cutter point. And I agree with those answers. Alright?Can you answer or not?
Answer please, im not sure i recall the arguments from the first few pages. IF you're so sure that this was solved in the first few pages, then you should be able to recall what those arguments are surely?Other people answered this exact cookie cutter point. And I agree with those answers. Alright?
I don't feel like parroting someone else's points. But no, on that it wasn't Sean, he came in page 3, and the pages starring him are page 4 onward. Lou, Bobsican, XSOULOFCINDERX, KLOL, etcetera are whom I agree with and they were mainly active pages 1-3. As usual with the Sean debacle I'm firmly between you both.Answer please, im not sure i recall the arguments from the first few pages. IF you're so sure that this was solved in the first few pages, then you should be able to recall what those arguments are surely?
Last i checked the main pushback arguments were from Sean, so do you agree with him or not?
So you cant answer despite being so sure of these points being 'solved'. Yeah i get it.I don't feel like parroting someone else's points. But no, on that it wasn't Sean, he came in page 3, and the pages starring him are page 4 onward. Lou, Bobsican, XSOULOFCINDERX, KLOL, etcetera are whom I agree with and they were mainly active pages 1-3. As usual with the Sean debacle I'm firmly between you both.
I'm sorry I don't feel like entering the forever debate with someone I know for a fact is a major stonewall, Jinx.So you cant answer despite being so sure of these points being 'solved'. Yeah i get it.
None of these people have points against the OP, the whole thread derailed to something the OP wasn't even suggesting so...
You quite literally came into this thread to re-iterate your usual tired stances. Trust me, im not sitting here anticipate what the reaper guy is gonna say, id rather just not see your messages ever again like it used to be.I'm sorry I don't feel like entering the forever debate with someone I know for a fact is a major stonewall, Jinx.
Jinx, listen. You are stubborn. You have your views on this, and those views ain't gonna change. I mean, they didn't across 8 pages, why would they across 9 arguing with someone you don't like to begin with? I made my points, pointed to who I agreed with since I really don't feel like regurgitating points to someone I know won't bite, and you're not required to agree with me or even count my vote since I'm not evaluation staff.You quite literally came into this thread to re-iterate your usual tired stances. Trust me, im not sitting here anticipate what the reaper guy is gonna say, id rather just not see your messages ever again like it used to be.
If you aren't confident enough to reiterate these imaginary arguments you're claiming has 'solved the thread', then dont bother replying. You can leave the thread at any time. Im not a stonewall cause you cba to state these arguments you 'agree with', im here for an actual discussion
I went over why the protagonist pages right now are super biased to one noncanon/secondary canon interpretation that goes against the mainline (which you claim to be against), and why the standards for them should be different as opposed to Sean making whoever he likes more the 'canon protag'. They've been left as is for year(s) cause no one gives af about the quality of this verse. Affirm what you have against that (cause nothing was decided otherwise). Otherwise leave.
Well atp what im thinking isI'm unsure what the current proposals are. Can anyone summarize?
I fully intend to rework at least one protagonist page (HGSS Ethan/Lyra). I'm capable and willing to do all the hard work that comes with adding every available Pokemon. I intended to do my own CRT, but I guess I need to wait for this one to reach a conclusion first
This sounds pretty good to meWell atp what im thinking is
A) We move all the current protagonist profiles we have to blogs for people to rework if they want.
B) We enforce the standards of how to make these protagonist profiles as more player characters, as opposed to making assumptions (like Sean did) as to which one is 'canon' or what exact Pokemon they have.
C) We stick to confirmed storybeats for any actual feats, but every other variable such as the range of Pokemon (imo, the games main dex and not including National Dex mons you require global trade for) is treated optionally (so still on the profile)
D) We rename them to something like 'Player (pokemongamename)' or 'Pokemon Trainer (pokemongamename)' (and we can make a redirect link for their canon names), just since they are more player characters. If we need them ofc.