• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Standard Battle Assumption Revision

31,624
5,420
On the SBA page, a current rule is that neither character should have any prior knowledge of the other under any circumstances.

However, this rule is unnecessary for a few reasons. First of all, there would be no reason to assume that fighters suddenly have knowledge outside of their normal knowledge or intelligence, and knowledge on the opponent is no different. It's about as necessary as saying that a character shouldn't know quantum physics by default. Furthermore, if they do have knowledge (it doesn't matter through what means), this rule doesn't really do much except hinder them for having a advantage.

TLDR: Its redundant.
 
It's better to be specific about such things and if it's just redundant it doesn't do any harm.

So just leave it there.
 
But it also clearly hampers people who have legitimate methods of prior knowledge, so it at the very least requires specification.
 
Well, I suppose we can specifiy "unless they canoncically have it".
 
Back
Top