- 2,069
- 1,440
Probably. The Axiom might be 0 depending on context.Will SMT be affected in any way by these changes?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Probably. The Axiom might be 0 depending on context.Will SMT be affected in any way by these changes?
Does that mean other characters will be High 1-A?Probably. The Axiom might be 0 depending on context.
It's very possible. Though I do think 1-A is pretty much guaranteed. High 1-A still might be possible as well.Does that mean other characters will be High 1-A?
Ultima is a “they?” Someone's probably going to make an SMT revision Cosmology and we can evaluate if those reasons are good enough. It's unlikely though.Pretty sure Ultima actually has said that they don't think the Axiom will apply for Tier 0, but even then, just because a series has a Tier 0 does not mean it will also have High 1-A characters.
Thats probably where the revision will be able to discuss these items in length. I understand there’s a discussion in the works?The Axiom is said to be able to be surpassed and could also be perceived. Doubt tier 0 would work at all.
High 1-A+ is a thing. The highest in the system is something that contains all possibilities and concepts.In general, is High 1-A (+) also a thing? I thought [+] modifier could only be added in Tier 1-A. But maybe that’s just my misunderstanding.
Based on their current profile, they likely aren't going to have any changes from this.seriosly,where does the bakery scale?
Cause she's beyond the extension of r>f layers of the witch domain, to the point that for her there's no difference between it and the human domain.Could you elaborate on why? Also, some guy claimed Eua isn't Featherine. Any thoughts on that regard?
Based on their current profile, they likely aren't going to have any changes from this.
someone wanted to make a revision in 2022 to 1-A,the problem was,it wasBased on their current profile, they likely aren't going to have any changes from this.
yes,it is (and also it was poorly made)and current profile is extremely outdated
1-A would actually probably start earlier tbhI don't see why SMT would have any changes from this.
Seems good.Cause she's beyond the extension of r>f layers of the witch domain, to the point that for her there's no difference between it and the human domain.
Also, Eua very likely is Featherine at some point in the past. Higu Mei pretty much aludes to this based on calling her the strongest witch or the closest to omnipotence and stuff.
Yeah, but that's because of "beyond dimensions" stuff, not R > F.1-A would actually probably start earlier tbh
Yep.is it a R>F anti feat if : Beings from lower levels of existence interacts with higher levels of existence via advanced technology?
Hope everyone having a good day!
I think it fits the Ultima's definition of reality-fiction, but since it won't be used, it doesn't really matter.I don't really think that's how R>F is being treated here in conjunction with the new system vision of R>F.
So does Featherine's part count as well or do we still accept her having R>F?Yep.
Also a massive anti-feat to Reality-Fiction relationship.what about going to a real world,where it sees your world has a videogame
why?Also a massive anti-feat to Reality-Fiction relationship.
Anti-feat unless it's got some very specific context. In general, a being from the "fictional" world shouldn't be able to exert any effect on the higher world using other fictional things, and that includes their power. (Unless that power is sourced from a higher world, or is in a higher world, or something)what about going to a real world,where it sees your world has a videogame
Wouldn't this downgrade the Elder Scrolls then, since the highest level of the verse is transcending the dream and taking control of it?Any "Reality-Fiction relationship" where the "fiction" interacts with the "reality" by itself or with technology, powers, or forces from their "fictional" world; whether it be travelling to it, ascending to it, manipulating it, threatening to destroy, using it to rewrite your "fictional world", or anything else, is a massive anti-feat that almost definitely guarantees it won't be considered a true Reality-Fiction relationship.
Attaining Amaranth is moreso dissolving yourself back into the Godhead, so, less "accessing" a higher level through your own physicality (Which is the problematic part) and moreso shedding all your attributes to realize what you always were at the core.Wouldn't this downgrade the Elder Scrolls then, since the highest level of the verse is transcending the dream and taking control of it?
If he intended to veto the thread from the start, he wouldn't have called a vote.Because I am not looking forward to them just vetoing the entire thread or flat-out stalling.
Not if it's a case where they are part of the dream and what is happening is they are dissolving their illusionary fictional existence to fully become one with the dream.Wouldn't this downgrade the Elder Scrolls then, since the highest level of the verse is transcending the dream and taking control of it?
how specific?because it is not like a fictional world on itself,it is just a world that was created by the ''real world''in the cosmology of the verse,worlds are created using a trascendental programming that allows all possible things to happen according to the programming,even if they sound contradictory.Anti-feat unless it's got some very specific context. In general, a being from the "fictional" world shouldn't be able to exert any effect on the higher world using other fictional things, and that includes their power. (Unless that power is sourced from a higher world, or is in a higher world, or something)
Fair enough, but nothing says he won't stall.If he intended to veto the thread from the start, he wouldn't have called a vote.
I'll wait.Fair enough, but nothing says he won't stall.
Hello ultima I needed to ask this from youIf he intended to veto the thread from the start, he wouldn't have called a vote.