-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
The Strongest 3rd Yonko Commander: Charlotte Cracker vs Jack.
- Thread starter Ryuga21
- Start date
Eminiteable
He/Him- 7,389
- 6,604
Voting Jack, he's a physical tank capable of contending with the likes of Fujitora Tsuru and Sengoku(maybe, maybe not). His stamina is massive allowing him to fight for days against comparable people, meaning he can definitely tank through the biscuits soldiers. And he can further amp his massive strength with his zoan forms(with his hybrid form being even greater).
Cracker has low pain tolerance so a few attacks from jack would quite easily take him down.
Cracker has low pain tolerance so a few attacks from jack would quite easily take him down.
- 192
- 27
Cracker takes this.
Jack don't have none type of Haki confirmed or showed while Cracker's Busoshoku is comparable to Gear Fourth. Cracker is tatical, as we seen when he spams an infinite number of soldiers to breach and hit the enemy by surprise (Jack whitout haki would get his head cutted). As said before, Cracker wouldn't physically fight Jack, all he needs to do is create endless soldiers and wait for the best chance.
Jack don't have none type of Haki confirmed or showed while Cracker's Busoshoku is comparable to Gear Fourth. Cracker is tatical, as we seen when he spams an infinite number of soldiers to breach and hit the enemy by surprise (Jack whitout haki would get his head cutted). As said before, Cracker wouldn't physically fight Jack, all he needs to do is create endless soldiers and wait for the best chance.
Eminiteable
He/Him- 7,389
- 6,604
Huh... Jack fought against Dog Storm and Cat Viper for several days without getting his head cut off... And the biscuit soldiers are going to be downgraded to 7-A making them pretty useless in the fight overall regardless if they're spammed, Unlike Luffy Jack isn't limited by a time-limit and can in fact quite easily sweep through the soldiers in either full or hybrid zoan.
- 5,220
- 3,346
If Cracker is being downgraded soon then this thread shouldn't have been made. We all know Jack has great endurance but he's slower than Cracker since Jacks profile only says he's possibly Relativistic+ whereas Cracker actually is, and Jack doesn't have Haki until it's officially confirmed he does.Eminiteable said:
- 192
- 27
Half the fight between Jack and the minks was not shown, and from what it was, Jack was being easily overwhelmed by them. Btw, soldiers serve as a defensive for Cracker to catch the enemy off guard. And Cracker have both Busoshoku and Kenbunshoku, even if the soldiers were not so helpful he would be able to defeat Jack alone. But even Luffy couldn't destroys Cracker's army so easily, I doubt that a character without range or AoE like Jack will make it.
- 2,426
- 476
It comes down to if you think Jack's offense is => than Tankman. . . Not just regular Gear4, I mean exclusively Tankman.
Given his feats he shouldn't even come close so I don't see him getting past the ever multiplying army. Turning into a mammoth may increase his range but it will also leave him more vulnerable to attcks.
Therefore Cracker wins.
Given his feats he shouldn't even come close so I don't see him getting past the ever multiplying army. Turning into a mammoth may increase his range but it will also leave him more vulnerable to attcks.
Therefore Cracker wins.
- 5,107
- 1,786
(Just FYI, when the downgrades happen, Jack and Cracker's stats will still be relatively the same in comparison to each other--unless the scaling for some reason gets incredibly messy).
Anyways, Cracker has the advantage of numbers, stat boosts, and that he will not need to directly attack Jack to harm him. Jack is a straight-forward muscle-head.
While Jack is busy cutting down biscuit soldiers in a simple tactic to force his way to Cracker, he'll gradually take more damage and be tagged by Cracker ever-so-often while the latter is just biding his time to throw an attack at appropriate openings. Jack has proven to be an idiot and took literally DAYS to change up his tactics despite Neko and Inu maintaining a consistent tactic that kept Jack in a permanent stale-mate. While Cracker proved to be impatient and reckless against Tank-man Luffy, this would be unlikely to happen vs Jack since his weakness will not be exploited, and Jack is stubborn and wont change tactics no matter what.
Cracker takes this mid-diff. The only risk is that Jack is simply stronger than the Biscuits (If we consider he fought Fuji + Tsuru and possibly even Sen-*******-goku all at once and managed to take half their ships down and escape with only moderate injuries), rendering them less effective, and that Cracker "can't handle pain" so if Jack landed a lucky hit, it may throw Cracker off his game.
Anyways, Cracker has the advantage of numbers, stat boosts, and that he will not need to directly attack Jack to harm him. Jack is a straight-forward muscle-head.
While Jack is busy cutting down biscuit soldiers in a simple tactic to force his way to Cracker, he'll gradually take more damage and be tagged by Cracker ever-so-often while the latter is just biding his time to throw an attack at appropriate openings. Jack has proven to be an idiot and took literally DAYS to change up his tactics despite Neko and Inu maintaining a consistent tactic that kept Jack in a permanent stale-mate. While Cracker proved to be impatient and reckless against Tank-man Luffy, this would be unlikely to happen vs Jack since his weakness will not be exploited, and Jack is stubborn and wont change tactics no matter what.
Cracker takes this mid-diff. The only risk is that Jack is simply stronger than the Biscuits (If we consider he fought Fuji + Tsuru and possibly even Sen-*******-goku all at once and managed to take half their ships down and escape with only moderate injuries), rendering them less effective, and that Cracker "can't handle pain" so if Jack landed a lucky hit, it may throw Cracker off his game.
Eminiteable
He/Him- 7,389
- 6,604
Gonna wait till the revisions are all done since Sabo and Fuji may raise in ranking thus jack would follow.
Similar threads
