Thomas the Tank Engine vs. SCP-173

[Jinsye]

The follow-up to this

Speed is unequal, 173 starts on the tracks, 20 meters away.

Who wins?

Thomas The Tank Engine: 0

SCP-173: 0

 

[Asuka_the_Demonic_Empress]

Well Thomas doesnt have a neck, so... And, Thomas is around 19m/s so he is running over without having to blink.

 

[Kirbyelmejor]

173 doesn't attack only at the neck

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

So long as this is, by NO means the Koitern variant, I suppose Thomas would bear enough time to accelerate into a rupturing collision with SCP-173, but should the collision be NOT small building level, Thomas most likely gonna have the thing collapse onto the tracks underneath him and rupture him from the inside...


My votes on thomas

 

[WeeklyBattles]

I dont believe Thomas has the KE to destroy 173

 

[Torlikoff]

Wasn't 173 supposed to be upgraded at some point?

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

I dont believe Thomas has the KE to destroy 173

Well yeah but are we talkin base 173 or the quantified excremental contingent that is the Koitern? if base then Thomas most likely wins (per Superhuman Speed and Small Building Striking Strength) versus 173's Wall level dura. If it Koitern THEN he screww

 

[Kyleb79]

Well since there no saying which form He harmed SCP-682 Which is A High Building At Weakest Point

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

Well since there no saying which form He harmed SCP-682 Which is A High Building At Weakest Point

Well 173 is Wall Durability, Dura and Strike Strength can vary, if Thomas bears both Superhuman speed (capping round 40 mph) and can strike at Small Building Level, we gotta keep in mind that F = MxA, therefore Thomas could MOST LIKELY destroy 173 at Max Speed

 

[Kyleb79]

Well SCP-173 as actually faster then thomas since at SCP-173 weakest speed is subsonic which is faster then the eye which is 343.2 m/s while a train is 150m/s.

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

Well SCP-173 as actually faster then thomas since at SCP-173 weakest speed is subsonic which is faster then the eye which is 343.2 m/s while a train is 150m/s.

But so long as Thomas forges Eyecontact during the whole 20 meter length, we will have worry not over Thomas being capable of collision with the SCP in question, and if we using Stop-Motion Thomas then we have NO WORRY of Thomas blinking in the slightest...

 

[Kyleb79]

SCP-173 clearly Survived attacks from SCP-682 who accientially destroyed a bridge and skyscraper i don't really think scp-173 should have a 9-B form

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

SCP-173 clearly Survived attacks from SCP-682 who accientially destroyed a bridge and skyscraper i don't really think scp-173 should have a 9-B form

When did these events occur? In a game or sorts? In some sort of canonical material?

 

[Kyleb79]

Item: SCP-173

Tissue Test Record: N/A, overridden by O5-Command

Termination Test Record: SCP-682 introduced into the containment area of SCP-173. SCP-682 makes several screeching noises, and quickly presses against the wall farthest from SCP-173, staring at it the entire time. SCP-682 continues to stare at SCP-173 without pause for six hours. Agents equipped with large-caliber sniper rifles dispatched, and shoot out the eyes of SCP-682, at the same time stopping all observation of SCP-173 and SCP-682.

After resuming observation, SCP-682 is shown to be on the floor, with several injuries around its head, neck and legs. SCP-173 is seen to have tissue from SCP-682 on its "hands". SCP-682 rapidly regenerates damage, and moves to a different wall, developing several sets of eyes on various parts of its body, many covered by thick, clear "caps" of armored carapace. SCP-682 maintains observation of SCP-173 for an additional twelve hours, despite additional efforts of Agents and Foundation staff. SCP-682 allowed to exit containment area, and recaptured in temporary containment.

Notes: After review, it appears SCP-173 was unable to do lethal damage to SCP-682 due to a major difference in physical size. A possible repeat of this test may be made if SCP-682 is damaged enough to reduce its physical mass to a level equal with SCP-173.

The Game version teaches nothing of his lore you should check the SCP wiki

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

I shall do so, but then why is not the first key of 173 reflective of such? If 173 is classified at Wall level and this seemingly supersedes that, a discrepancy their is is their not?

 

[Kyleb79]

He probulay going to get An Upgrade soon

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

So is the conclusion gonna be postponed until the upgrade is either approved or disapproved? Besides how do we know if this not just simply an exclusive durability, applicable solely to conflicts against this other SCP?

 

[Kyleb79]

You mean SCP-682

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

Yes, very much so.

 

[Kyleb79]

Well SCP-682 Survived so much Crap Im not going to Explain it but ill Give you the Link and when you go to the Page there will be A lot of Information and Even with More links http://www.scp-wiki.net/experiment-log-t-98816-oc108-682

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

I mean I was just enquiring if 173's "skyscraper/bridge" durability only activates when being attacked by 682

 

[Torlikoff]

Durability doesn't need to "Acitvate", it's just there normally. If we're only going by the original entry anyway it doesn't matter cause that's from a testing log.

 

[Kyleb79]

Also the reason scp 682 fears 173 simply because he singlehandley kill 1/3 of the leviathans which are Hyperversal or countless and probulay are going to be upgraded to High Hyperversal

 

[Torlikoff]

That's only the Koitern, not relevant here.

 

[Kyleb79]

Still 682 attacked 173 both were in normal form and scp 173 caused massive damage and taking hits from scp-682 who destroyed a bridge and skyscraper with ease most people say there normal forms scale to eachother not including adaption

 

[SwathingDegenera777]

BUT IS SUCH DURABILITY EXCLUSIBE TO WHEN SCP 173 IS ATTACKED BY 682?

 

[Torlikoff]

Logically no, but if we're going off of the original file then it's irrelevant.

 

[Kyleb79]

I dont think SCP-173 should have a 9-B form

 

[Insecurity97]

...Thomas FRA?