• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Ikki can win if ekko doesnt lead with timestop, its just that ekko is nore likely to lead with it than not

Not a stomp just decisive
 
It's a stomp because Ekko ''does'' lead with time stop or can time stop before Ikki does anything. Not sure why people think "There's a 99.9% chance that he won't use time stop so it's decisive" is valid reasoning.
 
WeeklyBattles said:
Ikki can win if ekko doesnt lead with timestop, its just that ekko is nore likely to lead with it than not
Not a stomp just decisive
>Practically thought based win condition

>Decisive

I mean ikki literally had like 7 matches that were deemed stomps cus he was too skilled, are we literally saying a match where the opponent can kill him before he can even move fair?
 
I don't know who either of these people are ffs
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top