• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

why

Messages
345
Reaction score
11
why dnt u get anpr for defeating like a group of 20 ppl when u literally can't do it without the skill to know where, when, and how they attack u, unless u jst speed blitz them all, if u dont, u lwky should get it, it implies possibly at the least
 
We don’t give ANPR to every character who can take out a large group easily. There are a lot of reasons for that. Sometimes it comes down to combat skill or experience rather than actual prediction. Some times it’s just how the scene is written, like when multiple opponents attack one at a time or don’t coordinate properly, basically fighting inefficiently. To actually qualify for ANPR, there needs to be clearer evidence. The character should be shown actively analyzing their opponent’s fighting style during the battle, adapting to patterns, or direct statements that they can predict movements.
Without that, it’s not really enough to assume analytical prediction is happening.
 
We don’t give ANPR to every character who can take out a large group easily. There are a lot of reasons for that. Sometimes it comes down to combat skill or experience rather than actual prediction. Some times it’s just how the scene is written, like when multiple opponents attack one at a time or don’t coordinate properly, basically fighting inefficiently. To actually qualify for ANPR, there needs to be clearer evidence. The character should be shown actively analyzing their opponent’s fighting style during the battle, adapting to patterns, or direct statements that they can predict movements.
Without that, it’s not really enough to assume analytical prediction is happening.
that dont even make sense cause combat skill and experience r directly relevant to the idea of anpr. It's stated on the page that they r closely connected. Also, if multiple opponents attack at one time that's even more of an impressive predictive feat/skill feat. If they don't co-ordinate properly ur still dealing with multiple attackers and ur attention has to be split and not be overwhelmed, if ur gunna attack someone un co ordinated everyone still has different moves, at different times that u gotta predict
 
That doesn’t really prove ANPR. Combat skill and experience being related to prediction doesn’t mean they’re the same thing. A character can handle multiple opponents through skill, positioning, and reactions without actually predicting their moves.

Even with multiple attackers, it’s still just reacting unless there’s clear evidence they’re analyzing patterns or reading moves ahead of time.
 
That doesn’t really prove ANPR. Combat skill and experience being related to prediction doesn’t mean they’re the same thing. A character can handle multiple opponents through skill, positioning, and reactions without actually predicting their moves.

Even with multiple attackers, it’s still just reacting unless there’s clear evidence they’re analyzing patterns or reading moves ahead of time.
relying on physical tells and strategy to stay ahead of opponents
ts kinda proves it's anpr unless its a speed blitz stomp
 
Back
Top