• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Death Battle Season Ten Discussion Thread (1) (All-time Death Battle Spoilers Alert)

Between the constant reminders on the Death Battle Server to not be toxic to the point of nuking discussion sometimes, the bad post-match analysis, the lack of a QnA to explain this extremely controversial episode, and the bill wank, you'd be forgiven for thinking Alex Hirsch personally funded this match lol. I respect Ultraguy's right to not have to answer questions, but I'll be straight with you, it comes off as incredibly fraudulent. Like bad enough Death Battle makes really wild and random leaps in episode, then the post-match analysis sucks, then there's no explanation post-hoc.

So now we have shit like "Bill is immeasurable because he has spacetime manip!" and the only explanation we'll ever get is "don't be toxic".
 
Ayewale said:
Between the constant reminders on the Death Battle Server to not be toxic to the point of nuking discussion sometimes, the bad post-match analysis, the lack of a QnA to explain this extremely controversial episode, and the bill wank, you'd be forgiven for thinking Alex Hirsch personally funded this match lol. I respect Ultraguy's right to not have to answer questions, but I'll be straight with you, it comes off as incredibly fraudulent. Like bad enough Death Battle makes really wild and random leaps in episode, then the post-match analysis sucks, then there's no explanation post-hoc.

So now we have shit like "Bill is immeasurable because he has spacetime manip!" and the only explanation we'll ever get is "don't be toxic".
Click to expand...
First time?

For years anytime someone disagreed with a Deathbattle ruling they got dismissed and got called "toxic" or "salty". Doesn't matter how valid the counterarguments were.

Whole argument can be fraudulent but they can just call you a name and dismiss you.

Ahhh the Deathbattle community.
 
So I was looking at the Journal 3 as you do, and I wanna point that Ford nearly beat Bill while in the Nightmare Dimension. The only reason Bill survived was because Mabel opened the portal to Bill's realm and Ford needed to close it or everyone would die.
EsRuiG7.png
cmtRFL8.png
 
Hunterzillas said:
Raise hands if you're an OG and have been waiting for this since Season 1.
Click to expand...
Truthfully, I didnt play Infamous in 2009 and even then it was never my big MU want, I expected them to do it eventually. They referenced it in 2018, surely it was given. Then eventually I realized it was a cuckadoodled ep. It then became one of my most wanteds, to not let a good MU to be cuckadoodled.

Let us do a short memorial until 3D kino. What are some good MUs that should have happened long time ago, but are now not happening, or are like sub 1% likely? Maybe those can get help later too.
 
Ayewale said:
Between the constant reminders on the Death Battle Server to not be toxic to the point of nuking discussion sometimes, the bad post-match analysis, the lack of a QnA to explain this extremely controversial episode, and the bill wank, you'd be forgiven for thinking Alex Hirsch personally funded this match lol. I respect Ultraguy's right to not have to answer questions, but I'll be straight with you, it comes off as incredibly fraudulent. Like bad enough Death Battle makes really wild and random leaps in episode, then the post-match analysis sucks, then there's no explanation post-hoc.

So now we have shit like "Bill is immeasurable because he has spacetime manip!" and the only explanation we'll ever get is "don't be toxic".
Click to expand...
I think it's less to do with any and all criticism being "toxic" and "salty" and more to do with when they give an an explanation (which isn't always substantial), they expect the audience to be somewhat mature about it and be patient enough to give an more detailed explanation for it.

Keep in mind, I think the post-analysis wasn't great but I wasn't gonna let it ruin the episode for me.
 
TMaakkonen said:
I hope by toxic they dont mean people who disagree with verdicts and post reasonable debunks, rather the nutters who pretend to be researcher and lord knows if they send death threats as well.

Ofc, angry debunks prolly do count as toxic as well.
Click to expand...
yeah, its all good if you disagree and is respectful, like genuinly people are crapping themselves because the mlp character didn't beat the illuminati ripoff
 
Lawyerr said:
First time?

For years anytime someone disagreed with a Deathbattle ruling they got dismissed and got called "toxic" or "salty". Doesn't matter how valid the counterarguments were.

Whole argument can be fraudulent but they can just call you a name and dismiss you.

Ahhh the Deathbattle community.
Click to expand...
Idk chief folks still be disagreeing n shit reddit and else where don't agree to everything DB does I terms of outcome
 
EJthe24th said:
I think it's less to do with any and all criticism being "toxic" and "salty" and more to do with when they give an an explanation (which isn't always substantial), they expect the audience to be somewhat mature about it and be patient enough to give an more detailed explanation for it.

Keep in mind, I think the post-analysis wasn't great but I wasn't gonna let it ruin the episode for me.
Click to expand...
This
 
So, do you guys think that they'll give the dub to Cole (rightfully), or will they have another **** up with the research?
 
Wow i missed allot.

Anyways Bill VS Discord...yeah i love it. Might even say it's my favorite ep of the season so far. Not gonna comment on the research being wrong since i don't scale Gravity Falls or MLP. I understand the problems people have and they are fine to have said opinions just as long as we respect one another. But as someome who knows both characters well in terms of their story, even if i only know Discord because of my sister, this ep is perfect for me and might be one of my favorite eps of all time. 10/10. Would probably lower the score if i was more into the research side of the match. Since the backlash sorta reminds me of Madara VS Aizen in some way as someone who's a Bleach Fan.

Also Next Time is cool even if i don't know much about Cole or Alex but I'm glad this match is finally able to happen after winning the 3D Poll.
 
Da3ggman said:
So, do you guys think that they'll give the dub to Cole (rightfully), or will they have another ***** up with the research?
Click to expand...
Bill's D stuff is kinda wank but it technically exists.

Alex just does not have that, in fact its Cole being Moon level wank that exists. This should be more akin to GutsDimitri, as in casuals historically favored Alex to win.
 
TMaakkonen said:
Bill's D stuff is kinda wank but it technically exists.

Alex just does not have that, in fact its Cole being Moon level wank that exists. This should be more akin to GutsDimitri, as in casuals historically favored Alex to win.
Click to expand...
Bill does have some fine 5D stuff, g1^2 I think handled that section fine imo discords getting 5D upgrades to eh
 
Also, Cole vs Alex is gonna be biggest flop of this season: character from dead video game series vs character from dead video game series. Those characters are only ''popular'' in vs community which on i'ts own is very specific and niche community
 
This matchup has higher chance of happening than Kars vs Meruem:
  1. Death Battle has already done Jonathan vs. Tanjiro, so they are familiar with pitting JoJo and Demon Slayer characters against each other.
  2. Jonathan vs. Tanjiro garnered over 800 thousand views in 24 hours, while Killua vs. Misaka received less than 500 thousand views in the same timeframe.
  3. Demon Slayer and Muzan's popularity is on the rise, while Hunter x Hunter and Meruem's popularity remains stagnant.
  4. The final season of Demon Slayer is near, so there will be more hype Muzan. Kars vs. Muzan is likely to be even more requested.
In conclusion: I believe Death Battle will choose Kars vs Muzan because it's way more profitable than Kars vs Meruem.

The only reason why Death Battle would theoretically choose Kars vs. Meruem is because it holds more legacy and/or they may prefer this matchup.

muh Muzan vs Naraku
Click to expand...
Why should Death Battle choose an Inuyasha character over a JoJo character?

b46682ebbef406e2884b90e6b1da0159.png
 
Ayewale said:
Between the constant reminders on the Death Battle Server to not be toxic to the point of nuking discussion sometimes, the bad post-match analysis, the lack of a QnA to explain this extremely controversial episode, and the bill wank, you'd be forgiven for thinking Alex Hirsch personally funded this match lol. I respect Ultraguy's right to not have to answer questions, but I'll be straight with you, it comes off as incredibly fraudulent. Like bad enough Death Battle makes really wild and random leaps in episode, then the post-match analysis sucks, then there's no explanation post-hoc.

So now we have shit like "Bill is immeasurable because he has spacetime manip!" and the only explanation we'll ever get is "don't be toxic".
Click to expand...

This but Excalibur vs Raiden, more or less. It's disingenuity we're referring to.
 
Seventy96 said:
This matchup has higher chance of happening than Kars vs Meruem:
  1. Death Battle has already done Jonathan vs. Tanjiro, so they are familiar with pitting JoJo and Demon Slayer characters against each other.
  2. Jonathan vs. Tanjiro garnered over 800 thousand views in 24 hours, while Killua vs. Misaka received less than 500 thousand views in the same timeframe.
  3. Demon Slayer and Muzan's popularity is on the rise, while Hunter x Hunter and Meruem's popularity remains stagnant.
  4. The final season of Demon Slayer is near, so there will be more hype Muzan. Kars vs. Muzan is likely to be even more requested.
In conclusion: I believe Death Battle will choose Kars vs Muzan because it's way more profitable than Kars vs Meruem.

The only reason why Death Battle would theoretically choose Kars vs. Meruem is because it holds more legacy and/or they may prefer this matchup.


Why should Death Battle choose an Inuyasha character over a JoJo character?

b46682ebbef406e2884b90e6b1da0159.png
Click to expand...

pepe.jpg
 
Joycap said:
This but Excalibur vs Raiden, more or less. It's disingenuity we're referring to.
Click to expand...
As I said before, it's less to do with any and all criticism being "toxic" and "salty" and more to do with when they give an an explanation (which isn't always substantial), they expect the audience to be somewhat mature about it and be patient enough to give an more detailed explanation for it.

It's not disingenuity, just simple passion leading to temperament.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Jasonsith
  • Locked
Death Battle Season Eight Discussion Thread (2) (All-time Death Battle Spoilers Alert)
554 555 556
Replies
22K
Views
1M
JustSomeWeirdo
JustSomeWeirdo
TMaakkonen
DEATH BATTLE! Accuracy Scale [Part 10, The more things change, the more they stay the same]
11 12 13
Replies
517
Views
34K
Hagane_no_Saiyajin
Hagane_no_Saiyajin
Back
Top