Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm fine with what Griffin's said as it was their first time doing that and seems to be unintentional.Okay. I would appreciate input from other staff members as well then.
Okay. I will unblock @Doomrider7 then.I'm fine with what Griffin's said as it was their first time doing that and seems to be unintentional.
Their apology seems genuine enough, and if there is the possibility of a false positive (mentioned by Dereck) then I think it would be fine to roll back the punishment and just remember this for the future.Okay. I would appreciate input from other staff members as well then.
Have you contacted him at all? It seems like at least some of his edits were indeed not allowed but usually we'd only go for an immediate ban if they were obviously troll-like in nature. If you hadn't contacted him and this was his first offense, I'd agree that we should tone it down to a stiff warning and proceed from there.Can somebody help me evaluate this case as well please? I think that I may have applied a far too harsh block time.
Yeah, this guy was objectively the aggressor in practically all of these scenarios (and more that were in that thread but unlinked). A stern warning could do for now, but if it is ignored/disobeyed, I think a ban would be in order, since usually this sort of thing is mitigated by everyone instigating the conflict- not so, here.I'd like to report Deleted member 16409 as they're getting very aggressive recently towards me:
Plus it's not even the first time they get so aggressive over Undertale stuff in discussions with me (here or here), and kinda of derailed an UT thread too back then.
- You're basically cherrypicking now, forgetting "sent back" on a funny purpose. You're the true definition of dementia. / Again your bias. Can't live without it or you will be dead in 5 seconds?
- Well, if Toby decides to put more information in japanese stuff just to make sure no ass will be contradicted, then it means that your ass is biased to canon information and preferring your dream fairy tales.
- Common sense is not your main thing, you know it, right?
Edit: There's also this, screenshotted before they deleted it.
alrDeleted member 16409: You really, really need to tone back the aggression and insults. We expect a level of maturity on this forum from our users, at least enough to engage civilly in discussions. If you can't, then you leave us little choice in the matter and you will be banned. So, please, behave.
Yes. They have also thanked us afterwards for giving them a chance via an email message.Their apology seems genuine enough, and if there is the possibility of a false positive (mentioned by Dereck) then I think it would be fine to roll back the punishment and just remember this for the future.
I did try to contact them, yes, and they did not respond until afterwards.Have you contacted him at all? It seems like at least some of his edits were indeed not allowed but usually we'd only go for an immediate ban if they were obviously troll-like in nature. If you hadn't contacted him and this was his first offense, I'd agree that we should tone it down to a stiff warning and proceed from there.
Agreed. Thank you for helping out.Yeah, this guy was objectively the aggressor in practically all of these scenarios (and more that were in that thread but unlinked). A stern warning could do for now, but if it is ignored/disobeyed, I think a ban would be in order, since usually this sort of thing is mitigated by everyone instigating the conflict- not so, here.
Deleted member 16409: You really, really need to tone back the aggression and insults. We expect a level of maturity on this forum from our users, at least enough to engage civilly in discussions. If you can't, then you leave us little choice in the matter and you will be banned. So, please, behave.
I reverted the changes:So i found that Blazeking17 has vandalized Sulphur (Phantom_Brave)'s page. Not only does Sulpur only shows up in a non canon plotline in the postgame was applied with no CRT.
Sir Ovens deleted the page; and based on his history. It seems a temporary block is in order. Though Fandom seems to be having a lot of loading issues on my end. So I cannot check let alone apply the block. And for how long? 3 months sound good?This user has created this profile that pretty much breaks all rules. Judging by his message wall, he was given warnings last month.
It's fine now, @LordGriffin1000 handled it.I don't want to be too harsh, but could any of you look at what's going on here?
Ben 10: Re-justification of Low 1-C.
New standard: This structure can then be generalized to any number of dimensions, which is why destroying a spacetime continuum is a greater feat than destroying only the contents of the physical universe (Low 2-C, rather than 3-A or High 3-A). For example, a higher spacetime continuum with two...vsbattles.com
My mistake, I thought I did link the profile instead.You should preferably link the profile that's been vandalized rather than the verse when making reports, especially when there are multiple pages for the character in question. Nevertheless, I figured out which you were talking about, I'll drop a warning to the user in question, thank you for the diligence.
I second this statement.That's poor behavior, and I've seen Random acting hostile in the past as well so this seems like an expected escalation. He should receive a warning for this IMO.
Edit: He edited out what he said after seeing the report. I don't think that really helps matters.
I agree that I need to calm down, and I'm working on it. I do apologise to Tatsumi for the misplaced hostility and to the staff for wasting their time.I agree with the warning, even though the user has specified that it may be a metaphorical comment not everyone is familiar with it and it may instigate problems, the apology seems genuine but it does not detract from the fact that the warning should be given because it appears to have previous similar behavior.
Leave JJK profiles as it is for now. I'm gonna change the ratings in future revisions. Currently 4 threads are already active and We are struck in the middle of discussion regarding current calculations. So it will take some time.Suguru Geto
Suguru Geto (夏げ油とう傑すぐる, Getō Suguru?) is an antagonist in both the Jujutsu Kaisen series and its prequel Jujutsu Kaisen 0: Jujutsu High. He was originally a student of Masamichi Yaga's alongside Satoru Gojo and Shoko Ieiri at Tokyo Jujutsu High. His experiences as a jujutsu sorcerer bred a deep...vsbattles.fandom.com
I'm unsure if it was an approved CRT since there are corresponding profiles that are Low 7-C but I'm reporting just in case since there was nothing linked.
You should have reverted the edits. Done already btw.I might be wrong, but this user appears to have made Scooby-Doo 3-A without a revision thread.