- 20,053
- 10,831
The force that’s the beginning of what shapes reality like chaos, also nice apples and oranges comparison here.
I’m talking about the soul and nature stuff, explain why that’s not concept hax beyond just “it’s not concept hax” because just saying no is not an answer.
Not an argument, explain why the ascension intro isn’t them making reality.
The scan being literally in Planck’s post that you keep dodging every time we keep talking about this. Address Planck’s post or stop arguing semantics cause you keep dodging all of the points being made.
Now that’s a blatant lie if I ever see one when all you did was address Gaia this entire time and not comment on every single point Planck made that addresses your entire OP, so no you didn’t “address every single scan and new argument” when you keep dodging Planck’s entire post.
Literally what mistakes exactly when this is a common thing across other verses? Again if you think this is a mistake in general then make the standard change for how concept hax is given. Plain and simple.
Don’t talk to me like you know exactly what Ant’s arguing, so stop trying to speak for him and let him speak his own mind on the matter, I asked him that question and not you. If he was agreeing with you then he wouldn’t entertain the idea of having concept hax be reworded to show more explicit showings and would still just outright remove the ability.
I’m talking about the soul and nature stuff, explain why that’s not concept hax beyond just “it’s not concept hax” because just saying no is not an answer.
Not an argument, explain why the ascension intro isn’t them making reality.
The scan being literally in Planck’s post that you keep dodging every time we keep talking about this. Address Planck’s post or stop arguing semantics cause you keep dodging all of the points being made.
Now that’s a blatant lie if I ever see one when all you did was address Gaia this entire time and not comment on every single point Planck made that addresses your entire OP, so no you didn’t “address every single scan and new argument” when you keep dodging Planck’s entire post.
Literally what mistakes exactly when this is a common thing across other verses? Again if you think this is a mistake in general then make the standard change for how concept hax is given. Plain and simple.
Don’t talk to me like you know exactly what Ant’s arguing, so stop trying to speak for him and let him speak his own mind on the matter, I asked him that question and not you. If he was agreeing with you then he wouldn’t entertain the idea of having concept hax be reworded to show more explicit showings and would still just outright remove the ability.