- 1,891
- 4,549
Would anyone be up for a discussion rule at this point?
I know AKM implemented a rule for the longest time like “do not revise the cosmology without new information from an ongoing series,” but I’m talking about something more specific, like a discussion rule against both 3-A macrocosm and Otherworld not being spatiotemporally separate.
I know AKM implemented a rule for the longest time like “do not revise the cosmology without new information from an ongoing series,” but I’m talking about something more specific, like a discussion rule against both 3-A macrocosm and Otherworld not being spatiotemporally separate.