- 12,494
- 16,894
100% agreedFrieza is the most durable character in the series from my view(relative to their actual power, regen don't count)
Dude is what I picture when thinking on a tank character
Mofo is just built different
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread
- Thread starter Warren_Valion
- Start date
Dude is what I picture when thinking on a tank character
Mofo is just built different
- 3,311
- 4,091
It’s still so crazy to me that with no Ki, while unconscious, cut in half, and with an extra near quarter of his body blasted away, (leaving naught but his chest, an arm, and half a face), he was able to tank a planet exploding on his face. And in Toei that explosion was so large the light it generated enveloped the whole galaxy.
And he STILL LIVED (albeit on death’s door) drifting throughout the cosmos. Dude is NOT built the same.
And he STILL LIVED (albeit on death’s door) drifting throughout the cosmos. Dude is NOT built the same.
- 12,494
- 16,894
Absolutely insane.
- 3,311
- 4,091
Mind you, he does this, gets stronger, and then gets vaporized by Trunks the next time he appears within the manga like chapters later. Toriyama literally looked at this awe inspiring antagonist (and with the advent of Trunks and his doomed future, the Super Saiyan transformation of Legend), he built up over countless weeks and months and decided to make it obsolete immediately. He legitimately had the most unpredictable writing style there was at the time.
- 14,211
- 7,471
His type 2 immortality helps a lot, even after turning into beef for Trunks he was still alive.
- 14,211
- 7,471
I can't wait for the characters to be mentioned destroying the characters at an atomic level or something similar and for it to be accepted on this wiki.
- 14,226
- 5,684
oh that is already mentioned when Trunks destroyed Freeza, Atomic level destruction can be done with a big enough AP Gap
- 15,584
- 4,567
I think he means as a kinda of Hax
- 14,211
- 7,471
Hax and not just what this Wiki accepts, o find it embarrassing to do this instead of giving atomic manipulation to the characters.
- 14,226
- 5,684
- 15,584
- 4,567
- 12,494
- 16,894
Deleted member 40688
Guest
Threads are more chill now
- 14,211
- 7,471
It looks like this is Dragon Ball Daima's date (not the release date, reveal date)
- 3,311
- 4,091
Daima News (July 21st) into Book of Bill publishing (July 23rd). Holy shit that’s a true combo right there.
BlastX
He/Him- 5,678
- 3,093
One thing I liked that Raging Blast changed that sadly Sparking Zero reverted is making Super Kamehameha as a regular super attack relegated to only SSJ3 Goku.
Because it doesn't make sense his SSJ from can use it as a super attack but gets relegated as an Ultimate Attack as a SSJ2 while that form has to use basic Kamehameha as a super attack.
Because it doesn't make sense his SSJ from can use it as a super attack but gets relegated as an Ultimate Attack as a SSJ2 while that form has to use basic Kamehameha as a super attack.
- 1,967
- 1,685
can't wait to play as Mid Goku in that game
- 14,211
- 7,471
I believe you have a Rayzen 7900x on your PC to play, right ?
Deleted member 40688
Guest
If the space that contains the multiverses is stated to be infinite. Would that bump db cosmo to 2A?
Case 1 uni is infite
Case 2 they are finite.
No hypertimelines
Case 1 uni is infite
Case 2 they are finite.
No hypertimelines
- 9,231
- 5,677
MGK had received 2-A because a room contained structures. The low 2-C value was infinite (the downgrade occurred for another reason)
So maybe.
- 1,788
- 1,393
Are you referring to the neutral zone?If the space that contains the multiverses is stated to be infinite. Would that bump db cosmo to 2A?
Case 1 uni is infite
Case 2 they are finite.
No hypertimelines
Deleted member 40688
Guest
- 1,788
- 1,393
If it's infinite it would be 2A yea, it's shown that the 2C universes don't fill up the entire space, it being infinite would mean it would have a volume the could contain a infinite amount of said universes, which actually could be 2x baseline 2A for dbs as they have 2 low2c spacetimes in each universe and 3x baseline for toei, since each macrocosm has 3 low2c spacetimes
- 3,426
- 2,515
I thought the space between universes was accepted as insignificant 5D. Maybe I'm wrong tho
- 1,788
- 1,393
It was
But he's probably asking about the 4D axis
Deleted member 40688
Guest
Is this where insignificant 5D NS was accepted?
- 14,226
- 5,684
Huh, just realized it, if Ultima's plan is to make space time feats Low 2-C independent of size, wouldn't that happens for Low 1-C and above as well since it follows the same logic?
Accelerated_Evolution
He/Him- 7,860
- 9,000
Not necessary, in relation to Low 2-C it would be a full rating due to the fourth-dimension being temporal. If it is 4 dimensions of space + one of time you would still need to prove that the fourth-dimension of space is of significant size
That´s at least what i understood
- 15,380
- 22,763
only time axis, space axis still require size to be significant
- 15,584
- 4,567
Oh so Ultima is also looking to fix the Time Axis size requirement for higher time dimensions?
- 14,226
- 5,684
Not really, the space axis/size is what determines if a space time is Low 2-C nowadays, time axis are assumed infinite by default
- 334
- 280
So according to what I read, it is a review where the size of space, even if it is a planet, does have a time axis.
es 4D would qualify for low 2c.
It is only important for only those who have their own time axes confirmed true.
or also for space-time that share axes?
since a temporal axis can encompass multiple space-times
It's better to wait and see what happens
es 4D would qualify for low 2c.
It is only important for only those who have their own time axes confirmed true.
or also for space-time that share axes?
since a temporal axis can encompass multiple space-times
It's better to wait and see what happens
Last edited:
- 3,675
- 5,681
He’s referring to how a time axis would make that 3D space infinite by default. So higher spaces wouldn’t be affected by this. (Unfortunately)
- 14,226
- 5,684
also other spaces if they have time, Time Creates snapshots regardless, of course, unless the space is actually timeless......for some reason
Deleted member 40688
Guest
Two hax threads
Talk about profile deletion
New tiering standards
Ssjg new speed.
That's it I think
Nullflowerblush
He/Him- 10,797
- 9,687
Dragon Ball Super, episode 63 - "Don't You Disgrace Saiyan Cells! Vegeta's Fierce Battle Commences!"
Spinoirr
He/Him- 17,751
- 10,405
How would this affect our scaling for the macrocosm?
Like that'd make the time chamber's low 2-C
- 14,226
- 5,684
yeah
