• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

All Purpose Dragon Ball Thread

StekFence said:
Idk, just sounds inconsistent. The next best feat is like, lave survival in dbs broly between the at the time, strongest guys
Click to expand...
The funniest part about this is that according to one of the head members working on the film, part of the original concept was Goku and Vegeta fighting Broly on the Sun. Which is a big “what?” given how massive of a jump in heat resistance that is. (Plus, breathing in space somehow?)
 
Antvasima said:
Hello.

What do the DB experts here think about this?

community.fandom.com

Antvasima

community.fandom.com community.fandom.com
Click to expand...
I believe this comes down to a difference in wanting to reconcile information. For example, he (Shin the Science Guy) states that Goku retcons the existence of the Otherworld Tournament Arc when he remembers falling into Hell (which makes no sense, because recalling he fell long ago does not then make his later visits suddenly not happen unless he specifically states that’s the only time he went, which he didn’t), ignoring how Hell in GT looks nothing like the Hell Goku fell into in Z, and ignoring how GT is the “canon” continuation of the Z-Anime, meaning both arcs must co-exist, and that Toei is full of constant inconsistencies we have to try and make sense of (such as how in the Anime, it is a fact Kid Buu > Buuhan, Goku at 1% in SSJ >= Ultimate Gohan, etc. None of which aligns with the Manga.)

Assuming he is right about the Otherworld Tournament, he is content to wipe it from the reality of the Anime entirely, which doesn’t make sense to do when Pikkon in fact re-appears and is part of the Buu Saga, one, and two, is essentially trying to handwave/ignore/write away the fact these two conflicting details exist and can be reconciled in some fashion.

Similarly, they attempt to write off the GT Dragon Book—Which is pretty explicit, Fusion Reborn Gogeta and SSJ4 Gogeta are one and the same—by using a scan about DBS Broly that doesn’t make real sense? (As the scan fully claims this is a NEW Broly, unconnected. Not that they are connected).

Strangely, their argument doesn’t even cover everything, like how the films were intended to be in the world of GT, hence why we SEE Cooler. The films are canonically considered part of the “Past Enemies of Dragon Ball” for GT’s continuity, which is the continuation of the Z-Anime. Meanwhile, a lot of their points are drawing false equivalents in the form of trying to cross reference material across SDBH Manga, the DBS Manga, and XV, and more.

To keep a long story short, I don’t find it to be a fully capable means of deconstructing my blog.
 
D̶̛̜̰̯͇̮̙͑̅͑̾́̌̚Ȏ̸̧̩̪̯̯̹͊̽̒͘D̴̨̛̩̹̤̠͈͌͂̐̅̄̃̐͊̿Ò̶̧̧̼̈́͌̍̆̄͑̚N̴̮̹̞̥̩̲̲͚̪͈̣͓̼̣̰̐̔̉͋͂͗̋͛̓̈̆̂̓͘͠ ̶̢̢̥̯̫͕̲͙̰͍͚̣̣̬̅̂̿͜Ȑ̶͍͙̻͍͇͇͕̳͎̻̼̣̙̆̾̓̆̒̋̓͌͌̌̽̚͘Ā̵̹̊͆̈́͗̓̀͆̚̕̚͠Ỳ̸̢̢̨̼͉͕̣̼̻͙̖̝͍̖ͅ!̸͙͌́͆̐͘͝!̶̨̡̛̰͉̳̭͎̙̥̲̩̟̙̗̃̇̅͐͊͋͆́̅̚͝!̷͉͔͎̰̯̖͉͖͖͑͑̿̐̓̌̋̔̔!̸̩̃̏̑͊̓̑̍̇̆̇̍͗́͘̚͜!̶̗̗̼̱̰̰͎̣̠̟̜̥̇̔̎̓̀̒͒̑̓̓̐͘̕ͅͅ!̵̬̤̖̖̰̠̜̄̏̽͋̔͂̉!̷̧̙͍͍̗̻̦͈̑͆̍!̷̡̡̧͎̪̜̦͔͓̞̼̘̅̈̓̿̋́̐̓̆͌͛̏͠͠!̵̧̧̭̮͉̩̽́͆̔̈́͆́͒̚͝͝ͅ!̸̳̓͌͑̓̈́͑͗̓̊̔͘ͅ!̴̥̇̋̎́̀̓̈͊̈́̎̇͋̉̈̚!̴̧͇̞̜̺̹̜͉̜̳̣͍̫̝͐̌̄͜!̶̧̡̥͍̖̥̙͔̭̗̝͒͛̓̔́͌!̷̝̮͉͈̟͉̭̟̈́͛̐͛!̸̭̹͔̪̮̦̲̂̈́͠͝!̷̧͔͙͙̮̼̥̼͐́

 
RedReaper616 said:
I believe this comes down to a difference in wanting to reconcile information. For example, he (Shin the Science Guy) states that Goku retcons the existence of the Otherworld Tournament Arc when he remembers falling into Hell (which makes no sense, because recalling he fell long ago does not then make his later visits suddenly not happen unless he specifically states that’s the only time he went, which he didn’t), ignoring how Hell in GT looks nothing like the Hell Goku fell into in Z, and ignoring how GT is the “canon” continuation of the Z-Anime, meaning both arcs must co-exist, and that Toei is full of constant inconsistencies we have to try and make sense of (such as how in the Anime, it is a fact Kid Buu > Buuhan, Goku at 1% in SSJ >= Ultimate Gohan, etc. None of which aligns with the Manga.)

Assuming he is right about the Otherworld Tournament, he is content to wipe it from the reality of the Anime entirely, which doesn’t make sense to do when Pikkon in fact re-appears and is part of the Buu Saga, one, and two, is essentially trying to handwave/ignore/write away the fact these two conflicting details exist and can be reconciled in some fashion.

Similarly, they attempt to write off the GT Dragon Book—Which is pretty explicit, Fusion Reborn Gogeta and SSJ4 Gogeta are one and the same—by using a scan about DBS Broly that doesn’t make real sense? (As the scan fully claims this is a NEW Broly, unconnected. Not that they are connected).

Strangely, their argument doesn’t even cover everything, like how the films were intended to be in the world of GT, hence why we SEE Cooler. The films are canonically considered part of the “Past Enemies of Dragon Ball” for GT’s continuity, which is the continuation of the Z-Anime. Meanwhile, a lot of their points are drawing false equivalents in the form of trying to cross reference material across SDBH Manga, the DBS Manga, and XV, and more.

To keep a long story short, I don’t find it to be a fully capable means of deconstructing my blog.
Click to expand...
Okay. Thank you for your reply. 🙏
 
Typically Koyama’s Word/Tweets aren’t allowed as full proof of anything on VSBW, hence why Hideki Kamiya literally confirming Mundus made a Universe on Twitter wasn’t enough of a justification for DMC until we found another scan corroborating it, so that’s literally just a difference in allowed information. Two, the tweet he utilizes is doing something we already respect, which is ignoring/not asking for consistency between the films and anime due to the work environment they suffered through.

It’s also for these reasons we rejected the Metal Cooler upgrade thread, as it relied on using contradictions born from the films to attempt to rationalize an upgrade for the character. Furthermore, we do not pretend these plot breaking contradictions make sense. Like we acknowledge with Dead Zone and Revenge of Cooler (as well as Fusion Reborn and Wrath of the Dragon), their plots despite being explicitly to implicitly confirmed to be canon to the Toei Continuity also makes no functional sense due to elements like Garlic Jr’s wish, Gohan meeting the Z-Fighters and knowing Goku is his father, Cooler attacking in the era of peace, etc.

In fact, the intent is to explicitly operate within the confines of the films, their supplementary material, and their relationship to the anime through scaling in ways that only make sense within the anime’s pre-existing logic.

He also doubles down on Pikkon being retconned, when that’s not at all evidenced, as I mentioned before. Whilst yes, it is out of character for Pikkon not to respond to a Hell Riot, him not appearing doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist. It means he simply did not appear within this facet of the story. Also, him appearing would be suspect regardless as this isn’t a standard Hell Riot, and is instead escaping DIRECTLY into the Living World, which isn’t what Pikkon deals with. He deals with attempts to break out within Otherworld.

Also, yes, GT does have a contradiction with Android Ki (of which I only learned yesterday), which we’ve yet to discuss to figure out how to quantify.

The immortality of those in the Afterlife only exists while they’re in their Afterlife, (hence why they can be killed again in Fusion Reborn and GT whilst the Afterlife is broken by the Heroes), with the immortality they have not originating from GT, but Z—Episode 55—And simply part of how inconsistent Toei is, trying to have its cake and eat it too. This is very similar to how we simply gave up trying to reconcile (Anime) Time Skip, in which it displays both Slow and Stop properties with no way of properly putting together the contradictions/inconsistencies in such a way that that simply has woven nonsense in between the gaps of the Original Manga’s canon.

Citing the Daizenshuu is ineffective, because the Daizenshuu was made before GT.

He (Shin) also claims that the Broly scan literally saying it’s a whole new Broly matters not because it talks about old Broly, but that’s still not comparable. Again, the GT Dragon Book is pretty clear. I’d also be remiss to include the World Of Toriyama Timeline, as it literally has Super and GT co-existing as the same Timeline/History, which is not possible.

The only one that matters to truly “debunk” it is Chouzenshuu, which copy and pasted the Daizenshuu Timeline and added solely the events of Battle of Gods and GT, down to Cooler and Garlic Jr. Which doesn’t make functional sense, as BoG was made with the intent of continuing the “world of the manga,” by Toriyama’s own admission.

This is backed up by a Press Release, citing it is not a Spin-off, Side-Story, etc. and is apart of the official history.

This is especially relevant when you consider the Daizenshuu Timeline itself also makes no sense, since it canonizes Garlic Jr., Cooler, and the Beginning of Eradication of the Saiyans. All things that literally aren’t present in the actual Manga Canon and makes no sense to exist. As I noted before—Lots of contradictions with us to pick up the pieces—To try and make sense of the story.

Also, he operates under the assumption we haven’t altered the canon of Super to more closely align with what we believe—That given the multitude of flashbacks, footage reuse, and more, that Super stands as a continuation of the DBZ: Kai anime rather than the original Manga. This, again, points to a difference in thinking. We strongly believe that repeated cameos and references in this way makes a strong case (and has been accepted), he simply does not.

Moreover, even if I conceded this is all bumpkis, his ‘debunk’ did not cover how all the films connect to each other (as they themselves cite in their Pamphlets, Anime Film Comics, etc.), and thus would be indirectly canonized anyway. Hence why my Blog covered the topic from every angle. The films being connected to such a degree means one being canonized means all are canonized. The anime directly connects itself to all through Fusion Reborn. Film elements on their own repeatedly appear. Etc. Etc.

He goes on to say the Daizenshuu Timeline and appearance of solely Cooler means only Cooler, electing to ignore the actual information from the scan in question—The narrative intent by the creators of GT to have the films be apart of the history of Dragon Ball.

The false equivalence bit seems to be disingenuous to me. Series like DBH/DBXV, and more that fall into those continuities are known for using information from across multiple known to be separate series for their story, as their story exists as a melting pot of all Dragon Ball content. Whether that be the DBS Anime, the DBS Manga, the Z films, DBL, Dokkan, etc. Comparing that to things known to be connected (Z and GT) and the stories known to be connected to each (Garlic Jr., Cooler for Z, indirectly connecting the rest, WotD, FR for GT, indirectly connecting the rest) seems fallacious. Of course DBS Anime Goku can use DBS Manga Goku’s Hakai, there (in SDBH). Because their sense of canon is just “literally everything, regardless of the amount of sense it makes.”

That said, I agree with him in the end—We should not be having proxy battles, connecting to the owner of VSBW for that matter (bothering them with something beneath their purview), nor copy and pasting a person’s blog to post off-site (without crediting until he wanted a ‘debunk’ for himself to use because he was being argued against? To my confusion?) or what-have-you. Frankly, I don’t understand the purpose of doing so. Our Wikis work entirely differently, strive for different goals, and thus cannot be compared to or against each other.
 
Ya know now that I think about it. Goku could had dealt with the stamina issue with SSJ3 after Buu saga. He didn’t have to take a long time to power up for it against Beerus and even going against Trunks it took like 5s for it to happen
 
BlackeJan said:
Ya know now that I think about it. Goku could had dealt with the stamina issue with SSJ3 after Buu saga. He didn’t have to take a long time to power up for it against Beerus and even going against Trunks it took like 5s for it to happen
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure he said he did? Or smth along the lines
 
RedReaper616 said:
Typically Koyama’s Word/Tweets aren’t allowed as full proof of anything on VSBW, hence why Hideki Kamiya literally confirming Mundus made a Universe on Twitter wasn’t enough of a justification for DMC until we found another scan corroborating it, so that’s literally just a difference in allowed information. Two, the tweet he utilizes is doing something we already respect, which is ignoring/not asking for consistency between the films and anime due to the work environment they suffered through.

It’s also for these reasons we rejected the Metal Cooler upgrade thread, as it relied on using contradictions born from the films to attempt to rationalize an upgrade for the character. Furthermore, we do not pretend these plot breaking contradictions make sense. Like we acknowledge with Dead Zone and Revenge of Cooler (as well as Fusion Reborn and Wrath of the Dragon), their plots despite being explicitly to implicitly confirmed to be canon to the Toei Continuity also makes no functional sense due to elements like Garlic Jr’s wish, Gohan meeting the Z-Fighters and knowing Goku is his father, Cooler attacking in the era of peace, etc.

In fact, the intent is to explicitly operate within the confines of the films, their supplementary material, and their relationship to the anime through scaling in ways that only make sense within the anime’s pre-existing logic.

He also doubles down on Pikkon being retconned, when that’s not at all evidenced, as I mentioned before. Whilst yes, it is out of character for Pikkon not to respond to a Hell Riot, him not appearing doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist. It means he simply did not appear within this facet of the story. Also, him appearing would be suspect regardless as this isn’t a standard Hell Riot, and is instead escaping DIRECTLY into the Living World, which isn’t what Pikkon deals with. He deals with attempts to break out within Otherworld.

Also, yes, GT does have a contradiction with Android Ki (of which I only learned yesterday), which we’ve yet to discuss to figure out how to quantify.

The immortality of those in the Afterlife only exists while they’re in their Afterlife, (hence why they can be killed again in Fusion Reborn and GT whilst the Afterlife is broken by the Heroes), with the immortality they have not originating from GT, but Z—Episode 55—And simply part of how inconsistent Toei is, trying to have its cake and eat it too. This is very similar to how we simply gave up trying to reconcile (Anime) Time Skip, in which it displays both Slow and Stop properties with no way of properly putting together the contradictions/inconsistencies in such a way that that simply has woven nonsense in between the gaps of the Original Manga’s canon.

Citing the Daizenshuu is ineffective, because the Daizenshuu was made before GT.

He (Shin) also claims that the Broly scan literally saying it’s a whole new Broly matters not because it talks about old Broly, but that’s still not comparable. Again, the GT Dragon Book is pretty clear. I’d also be remiss to include the World Of Toriyama Timeline, as it literally has Super and GT co-existing as the same Timeline/History, which is not possible.

The only one that matters to truly “debunk” it is Chouzenshuu, which copy and pasted the Daizenshuu Timeline and added solely the events of Battle of Gods and GT, down to Cooler and Garlic Jr. Which doesn’t make functional sense, as BoG was made with the intent of continuing the “world of the manga,” by Toriyama’s own admission.

This is backed up by a Press Release, citing it is not a Spin-off, Side-Story, etc. and is apart of the official history.

This is especially relevant when you consider the Daizenshuu Timeline itself also makes no sense, since it canonizes Garlic Jr., Cooler, and the Beginning of Eradication of the Saiyans. All things that literally aren’t present in the actual Manga Canon and makes no sense to exist. As I noted before—Lots of contradictions with us to pick up the pieces—To try and make sense of the story.

Also, he operates under the assumption we haven’t altered the canon of Super to more closely align with what we believe—That given the multitude of flashbacks, footage reuse, and more, that Super stands as a continuation of the DBZ: Kai anime rather than the original Manga. This, again, points to a difference in thinking. We strongly believe that repeated cameos and references in this way makes a strong case (and has been accepted), he simply does not.

Moreover, even if I conceded this is all bumpkis, his ‘debunk’ did not cover how all the films connect to each other (as they themselves cite in their Pamphlets, Anime Film Comics, etc.), and thus would be indirectly canonized anyway. Hence why my Blog covered the topic from every angle. The films being connected to such a degree means one being canonized means all are canonized. The anime directly connects itself to all through Fusion Reborn. Film elements on their own repeatedly appear. Etc. Etc.

He goes on to say the Daizenshuu Timeline and appearance of solely Cooler means only Cooler, electing to ignore the actual information from the scan in question—The narrative intent by the creators of GT to have the films be apart of the history of Dragon Ball.

The false equivalence bit seems to be disingenuous to me. Series like DBH/DBXV, and more that fall into those continuities are known for using information from across multiple known to be separate series for their story, as their story exists as a melting pot of all Dragon Ball content. Whether that be the DBS Anime, the DBS Manga, the Z films, DBL, Dokkan, etc. Comparing that to things known to be connected (Z and GT) and the stories known to be connected to each (Garlic Jr., Cooler for Z, indirectly connecting the rest, WotD, FR for GT, indirectly connecting the rest) seems fallacious. Of course DBS Anime Goku can use DBS Manga Goku’s Hakai, there (in SDBH). Because their sense of canon is just “literally everything, regardless of the amount of sense it makes.”

That said, I agree with him in the end—We should not be having proxy battles, connecting to the owner of VSBW for that matter (bothering them with something beneath their purview), nor copy and pasting a person’s blog to post off-site (without crediting until he wanted a ‘debunk’ for himself to use because he was being argued against? To my confusion?) or what-have-you. Frankly, I don’t understand the purpose of doing so. Our Wikis work entirely differently, strive for different goals, and thus cannot be compared to or against each other.
Click to expand...
I think that your reasoning makes sense. Thank you for helping out. 🙏
 
Antvasima said:
@RedReaper616

There seems to be a new reply here:

community.fandom.com

Antvasima

community.fandom.com community.fandom.com
Click to expand...
Ant, these are off-sites arguments that almost certainly do not entertain our standards. The user in question did a copy-paste (on which he didn't even give credit to RedReaper) to stirr the pot in another wiki. Continuing to give it attention is a genuine waste of time.

Edit: Correction, he credited Reaper in his second response to the "debunks"
 
Last edited:
Darkmon_cns said:
Dose anyone know where that thread was that connected super to Kia? I would like to read through it
Click to expand...
vsbattles.com

To be canon or not to be that is the question.A Dragon ball Super revision

Well hello everyone I am back with another crt the objective of this crt would be to prove why DBZ Kai is canon to DBS anime First let me lay some base for the argument in Dragon ball Super we can see them using flash backs from the anime for some scenes in super 1)In Dragon ball super...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
RedReaper616 said:
Typically Koyama’s Word/Tweets aren’t allowed as full proof of anything on VSBW, hence why Hideki Kamiya literally confirming Mundus made a Universe on Twitter wasn’t enough of a justification for DMC until we found another scan corroborating it, so that’s literally just a difference in allowed information. Two, the tweet he utilizes is doing something we already respect, which is ignoring/not asking for consistency between the films and anime due to the work environment they suffered through.

It’s also for these reasons we rejected the Metal Cooler upgrade thread, as it relied on using contradictions born from the films to attempt to rationalize an upgrade for the character. Furthermore, we do not pretend these plot breaking contradictions make sense. Like we acknowledge with Dead Zone and Revenge of Cooler (as well as Fusion Reborn and Wrath of the Dragon), their plots despite being explicitly to implicitly confirmed to be canon to the Toei Continuity also makes no functional sense due to elements like Garlic Jr’s wish, Gohan meeting the Z-Fighters and knowing Goku is his father, Cooler attacking in the era of peace, etc.

In fact, the intent is to explicitly operate within the confines of the films, their supplementary material, and their relationship to the anime through scaling in ways that only make sense within the anime’s pre-existing logic.

He also doubles down on Pikkon being retconned, when that’s not at all evidenced, as I mentioned before. Whilst yes, it is out of character for Pikkon not to respond to a Hell Riot, him not appearing doesn’t mean he doesn’t exist. It means he simply did not appear within this facet of the story. Also, him appearing would be suspect regardless as this isn’t a standard Hell Riot, and is instead escaping DIRECTLY into the Living World, which isn’t what Pikkon deals with. He deals with attempts to break out within Otherworld.

Also, yes, GT does have a contradiction with Android Ki (of which I only learned yesterday), which we’ve yet to discuss to figure out how to quantify.

The immortality of those in the Afterlife only exists while they’re in their Afterlife, (hence why they can be killed again in Fusion Reborn and GT whilst the Afterlife is broken by the Heroes), with the immortality they have not originating from GT, but Z—Episode 55—And simply part of how inconsistent Toei is, trying to have its cake and eat it too. This is very similar to how we simply gave up trying to reconcile (Anime) Time Skip, in which it displays both Slow and Stop properties with no way of properly putting together the contradictions/inconsistencies in such a way that that simply has woven nonsense in between the gaps of the Original Manga’s canon.

Citing the Daizenshuu is ineffective, because the Daizenshuu was made before GT.

He (Shin) also claims that the Broly scan literally saying it’s a whole new Broly matters not because it talks about old Broly, but that’s still not comparable. Again, the GT Dragon Book is pretty clear. I’d also be remiss to include the World Of Toriyama Timeline, as it literally has Super and GT co-existing as the same Timeline/History, which is not possible.

The only one that matters to truly “debunk” it is Chouzenshuu, which copy and pasted the Daizenshuu Timeline and added solely the events of Battle of Gods and GT, down to Cooler and Garlic Jr. Which doesn’t make functional sense, as BoG was made with the intent of continuing the “world of the manga,” by Toriyama’s own admission.

This is backed up by a Press Release, citing it is not a Spin-off, Side-Story, etc. and is apart of the official history.

This is especially relevant when you consider the Daizenshuu Timeline itself also makes no sense, since it canonizes Garlic Jr., Cooler, and the Beginning of Eradication of the Saiyans. All things that literally aren’t present in the actual Manga Canon and makes no sense to exist. As I noted before—Lots of contradictions with us to pick up the pieces—To try and make sense of the story.

Also, he operates under the assumption we haven’t altered the canon of Super to more closely align with what we believe—That given the multitude of flashbacks, footage reuse, and more, that Super stands as a continuation of the DBZ: Kai anime rather than the original Manga. This, again, points to a difference in thinking. We strongly believe that repeated cameos and references in this way makes a strong case (and has been accepted), he simply does not.

Moreover, even if I conceded this is all bumpkis, his ‘debunk’ did not cover how all the films connect to each other (as they themselves cite in their Pamphlets, Anime Film Comics, etc.), and thus would be indirectly canonized anyway. Hence why my Blog covered the topic from every angle. The films being connected to such a degree means one being canonized means all are canonized. The anime directly connects itself to all through Fusion Reborn. Film elements on their own repeatedly appear. Etc. Etc.

He goes on to say the Daizenshuu Timeline and appearance of solely Cooler means only Cooler, electing to ignore the actual information from the scan in question—The narrative intent by the creators of GT to have the films be apart of the history of Dragon Ball.

The false equivalence bit seems to be disingenuous to me. Series like DBH/DBXV, and more that fall into those continuities are known for using information from across multiple known to be separate series for their story, as their story exists as a melting pot of all Dragon Ball content. Whether that be the DBS Anime, the DBS Manga, the Z films, DBL, Dokkan, etc. Comparing that to things known to be connected (Z and GT) and the stories known to be connected to each (Garlic Jr., Cooler for Z, indirectly connecting the rest, WotD, FR for GT, indirectly connecting the rest) seems fallacious. Of course DBS Anime Goku can use DBS Manga Goku’s Hakai, there (in SDBH). Because their sense of canon is just “literally everything, regardless of the amount of sense it makes.”

That said, I agree with him in the end—We should not be having proxy battles, connecting to the owner of VSBW for that matter (bothering them with something beneath their purview), nor copy and pasting a person’s blog to post off-site (without crediting until he wanted a ‘debunk’ for himself to use because he was being argued against? To my confusion?) or what-have-you. Frankly, I don’t understand the purpose of doing so. Our Wikis work entirely differently, strive for different goals, and thus cannot be compared to or against each other.
Click to expand...
What do you think of the argument of people arguing against Infinite sized universe for Toei, using the visual of the anime if Heaven being a Planet, or the Kaioshin realm being as big as a good part of the Universe, meaning finite sizes?
 
Ruphas_Mafahl123 said:
What do you think of the argument of people arguing against Infinite sized universe for Toei,
Click to expand...
I personally don’t think the Universe is infinite in Toei, but I’m in the minority.
Ruphas_Mafahl123 said:
using the visual of the anime if Heaven being a Planet,
Click to expand...
I don’t think the fact it’s a planet defies it being universal in size, which is supported in the actual Anime when Videl gives the epitome of exposition in the scene that introduces the concept. Even it being a planet doesn’t stop it from being an infinite size planet. Just like how infinite size universes don’t stop being infinite when viewed as infinitesmal dots in a larger, higher dimensional space. (Not that such applies here). Infinity is an abstract concept that can’t truly be visualized in artistic form. Every page, every frame, every panel, has an end. Hence creative liberty/license for things like that.
Ruphas_Mafahl123 said:
or the Kaioshin realm being as big as a good part of the Universe, meaning finite sizes?
Click to expand...
It being 1/10th of the Universe doesn’t really mean anything, even if it was really infinite. Fictional stories have been known to play with the concept of “bigger” and “lower” infinities all the time. Again, abstract concepts that can’t really be visualized.

Again, though, I disagree with the conclusion itself. I just don’t buy these points being enough to debunk it, because we already accept the conventions of fictional mediums/writers/artists/game engines/etc. in trying to achieve a “picture accurate” infinity.
 
RedReaper616 said:
I personally don’t think the Universe is infinite in Toei, but I’m in the minority.

I don’t think the fact it’s a planet defies it being universal in size, which is supported in the actual Anime when Videl gives the epitome of exposition in the scene that introduces the concept. Even it being a planet doesn’t stop it from being an infinite size planet. Just like how infinite size universes don’t stop being infinite when viewed as infinitesmal dots in a larger, higher dimensional space. (Not that such applies here). Infinity is an abstract concept that can’t truly be visualized in artistic form. Every page, every frame, every panel, has an end. Hence creative liberty/license for things like that.

It being 1/10th of the Universe doesn’t really mean anything, even if it was really infinite. Fictional stories have been known to play with the concept of “bigger” and “lower” infinities all the time. Again, abstract concepts that can’t really be visualized.

Again, though, I disagree with the conclusion itself. I just don’t buy these points being enough to debunk it, because we already accept the conventions of fictional mediums/writers/artists/game engines/etc. in trying to achieve a “picture accurate” infinity.
Click to expand...
Thanks a lot for the answer. I honestly agree with your point. I just asked you becouse I know someone from Discord (who is barely active in the wiki) who systematically complained about it's rating tho.
But yeah, visuals do not always represent the full extent of the stuff we see on screen. On Trinity Seven, a verse I follow, Universes are portrayed multiple times depicted as "Planets", heck you can even see continents on them. Yet that doesn't desqualify them from being Universes, nor being infinite.

Thanks a lot for taking the time to answer my question. Now I feel safer and more calm about this issue.
 
BlackeJan said:
Ya know now that I think about it. Goku could had dealt with the stamina issue with SSJ3 after Buu saga. He didn’t have to take a long time to power up for it against Beerus and even going against Trunks it took like 5s for it to happen
Click to expand...
He didn't need long to power up long vs kid buu at all

He only took that long going ssj3 vs fat buu bc he was stalling for time
 
RedReaper616 said:
Its weird, because in the ToP Goku definitely acts as if SSJ3 is still ungodly draining on his stamina.
Click to expand...
He still recovering after the battle with Jiren, he only got some ki from Frieza before. Using SSJ3 in that state and in a battlefield where he can be targeted anytime by over 10 fighters, is definitely troublesome

Still it is funny that he went SSG after he recovering enough power, so SSJ3 still not worth the effort
 
maybe im blind/dumb, but are you referring to something in specific, or are u just saying it generally
 
XXBenShapiroXx said:
Yes
Click to expand...
e9fe38be27db232cf323bc1a4b2667b11de8e014r1-480-272_hq.gif
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mbpoops
Transcending all Dimensions! the forgotten dokkan profile
Replies
13
Views
1K
AlipheeseXIV
AlipheeseXIV
Broly movie but in GT (GT Goku and Vegeta vs DBS Broly) [1-4-0]
2
Replies
50
Views
955
MannyQ361
Alternate Universe: Haxgon Ball Z
Replies
0
Views
435
ALEPHGOAT
Killerdrone123
  • Locked
Quick GT Goku addition
Replies
24
Views
3K
Vietthai96
Vietthai96
FoxySonicMaster108
Dragon Ball Z: Anime and Movies being one thing?
Replies
2
Views
945
JustANormalPerson01
JustANormalPerson01
Back
Top