Talking with actual Japanese people, it's clear that they don’t make as big a deal about "canon" as many in the West do. For example, it has never officially happened that an author or media outlet in Japan declared “only the manga is canon.” That mindset mostly comes from Western fans. The word canon in the way we use it doesn’t even exist in the Japanese language in the same sense.
yeah, but Hatchijack had an energy signature that could be sensed aswell
fine
I know, I just wanted to point out how that one can fit in, almost entirely with very minor contradictions such as the Cooler and Hildegarn thingy
Trunks sword looking different could be an artistic choice, and there isnt other explanation as of why he has it other than a headcanon.
Yes and nice, doesnt really disprove warth of the dragon from being canon to the anime. If anything, guides can contradict themselves more often than not, and you know primary canon takes precedence over supplementary material. In this case it doesnt have much bearing with the show in question.
The whole thread is right there on Twitter. It’s the second of 3 threads.
oke thanks
They will never let the dbs anime return, atleast not for a couple of years.
Why is an explanation even needed? Again, need I remind you, the sword with the golden hilt Trunks brandishes in exactly one (1) shot in the series opening does not appear in the series itself once. Never is Trunks ever depicted wielding a sword of any shape, size, or color; nor is he ever referencing or alluding to a sword he owns; nor is he ever even suggested to be a swordsmanship of any level of ability. During the events of GT, Trunks and swords never intersect. In fact, I do not even believe the sword is brought up in the Chōzenshū.
Your entire argument is founded upon the idea that Tapion's sword and the Dragon Fist are carried over from Wrath of the Dragon. Tapion's sword does not appear in GT, Trunks never uses a sword during the events of GT, and Chōzenshū 3 confirms Goku developed and first used the Dragon Fist against Super 17 in GT.
Nothing in the source material implies Goku did not develop and first use the Dragon Fist against Super 17. Why is Goku ad libbing a technique such a far-fetched idea to you? He has improvised new moves before; say, for example, the Feet Kamehameha. In fact, when Goku first uses the Dragon Fist, he does not unleash forth a dragon made from energy which ensnares its target and then explodes, like against Hirudegarn in Wrath of the Dragon; he simply charges straight through Super 17, as he once did against King Piccolo, with the image of a dragon guiding him as he unleashes his full power.
Toei Animation produces the anime. Shueisha does not even have the audiovisual rights to the franchise; Capsule Corp Tokyo manages the audiovisual rights.
I thought the problem was that Akio had a fight with Sueshia becouse they own the rights of the DBS canon and Toei can't start the anime production becouse of that.
DBS fans are nervous because there is no sequel to DBS until today anime
... god do I miss that sh*t. at least dont act like pseudo intellectual dicks.
I see
That's Volume 24
A live action movie?
Ssj5 Goku (Ssj4 + Ultra instinct)?
They're going to need to Retcon a lot of things, and also make sure they hire a actual good director
Unironically a real possibility, yet another vegeta L
~~only ones an outlier~~
How dare you suggest anyone is above our CHAMPION, contrary to Goku, he needs no TRICKS
ALL HAIL SATAN
People aren't ready for Satan to unleash his full powermr. satan survived cells full power slap & defeated goku & turned SSJ without saiyan genes and zero training
Batman with prep time aint nothing compared to Mr. Satan
