• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The inclusion of "Star Wars: Supernatural Encounters" to the wiki

Messages
198
Reaction score
139
Important note: Yesterday, I made another thread that is equal, word-for-word, as this one. I'm uncertain if the first one could be read by others or not, since it was a "sandbox" thread (something I didn't notice), but if it's readable, as well as this one, apologies, I didn't mean to make two equal threads.

Prelude

It should be noted, first and foremost, that this present discussion is not without precedent, asit has already found consideration in the revision thread"Star Wars Cosmology Revision - Part 1 of 4: Legends Cosmology Overview" (link here). Within that thread, the conceptual framework and interpretive stance which I now seek to articulate were, in broad terms, already proposed and discussed.

While the finer points and terminological exactitude may vary, the general thrust of the proposal here advanced aligns closely with the consensus—implicit or explicit—reached by many participants therein. It is thus with a view toward continuity, rather than divergence, that I wished to develop and refine this position further.

What is "Supernatural Encounters" and is it legitimate?

There has been, as is oft the case in speculative fiction, considerable controversy surrounding the eligibility of "Supernatural Encounters: The Trial and Transformation of Arhul Hextrophon" (henceforth "Supernatural Encounters", "S.E.", or simply "SE") to be employed as a source in powerscaling discussions in this wiki. Detractors have cited its complicated publication history, its unorthodox method of release, and its liminal canonical status as cause for dismissal. Yet upon closer scrutiny of both the legal, editorial, and intertextual dimensions of the work, it becomes increasingly clear that Supernatural Encounters is, in fact, qualified for serious consideration.

To begin, one must lay to rest the common but erroneous assertion that Supernatural Encounters is merely a fanwork. That is incorrect. The work was officially licensed by Lucasfilm, and its publication journey began long before the Disney acquisition. It was initially slated for serialization in Star Wars Gamer, and later Hyperspace—Lucasfilm’s premium content platform—under the editorial guidance of Lucas Licensing. Its author, Joseph Bongiorno, submitted the same W-9 and CA-587 tax documentation required of all official Star Wars contributors (see email correspondence and documentation). The novella’s overview was approved by Lucasfilm staff, and its inclusion within the broader tapestry of Expanded Universe lore was anticipated—before the corporate restructuring rendered the Legends continuity dormant.

The delays surrounding S.E.’s publication were not due to any lack of legitimacy or quality, but rather a confluence of external factors, chief among them being Disney’s purchase of Lucasfilm in 2012. The transition in custodianship effectively locked the gates on all pending Legends content. As a result, S.E. was cast into a kind of editorial limbo. Its contents had been mostly finalized; its connections to existing lore established; and yet, owing to policy, its formal release was suspended. In time, the author released the full work on his own platform and more recently, it was issued in print through Amazon for occasional commercial distribution (link).

Here is an important point of emphasis: the Amazon listing itself attests to SE’s legal status. Were it an unauthorized use of the Star Wars IP, Disney's legal team would have undoubtedly intervened, as they are notoriously swift in striking down infringing materials. Instead, the work remains freely and openly available, marked as an “Expanded Universe book” and adorned with similar aesthetic as other Legends entries (see for reference).
Yet for all this, one must be clear on a critical distinction—Supernatural Encounters is not “canon” to the mainline Expanded Universe, in the sense that the mainline EU stories do not presume SE's framework as binding. Rather, SE operates as an all-inclusive framework, one that incorporates the EU, Disney Canon, and Infinities into its own internal story. The novel treats all three continuities as mytho-historical reflections within its overarching schema, and the fact that the last two continuities are described as "other Universes" in the author's own site is indicative of such. There will be a link at the end of this thread to display this.

As such, SE belongs to its own category of Star Wars literature—works authorized, written under license, and composed by known contributors, yet existing outside the final editorial gatekeeping that would classify it as unambiguously canonical. Nevertheless, many of SE’s ideas and terms have permeated published works. Typhojem, the Left-Handed God of the Sith, appears in Book of Sith by Dan Wallace. Several obscure alien species (such as the Shimholt and Rozzum) first defined in SE are catalogued in The Essential Guide to Alien Species and The Knights of the Old Republic Campaign Guide.

As to the author’s credentials, Joseph Bongiorno is no stranger to the Star Wars literary landscape. He contributed to the Hyperspace webspace, edited Star Wars content for Sequart, and was long involved in efforts to harmonize the EU’s sprawling mythos. More on his background can be found on his Wookieepedia entry.

For those who remain in doubt, primary sources on all the aforementioned contents are available—emails with Lucasfilm, production histories, editorial endorsements, and more—can be consulted here:

Does SE meet the criteria for inclusion in the wiki?

As stipulated under Section: Inclusion of Verses, particularly Point 1, the Wiki accepts self-published works provided that they have attained a demonstrable level of notability. Supernatural Encounters is indeed self-published, yet this in no way undermines its legitimacy, as it is an officially licensed publication bearing the imprimatur of Lucasfilm's prior endorsement and oversight. The work is sometimes distributed commercially through Amazon (cf. Amazon Listing) and freely online in the author's website and has been recognized in the fandom. Its visibility and acknowledgment across various corners of the Star Wars community surpass the minimum bar of notability required of self-published sources.

Under Point 2 of the same section, it is prohibited to admit personal works authored by individuals from within the versus debating community unless said works have been officially published by a reputable entity with widespread recognition. While Joseph Bongiorno is known in fan circles, he has been formally engaged with Lucasfilm for editorial and archival purposes, and his other contributions—such as the Legends timeline and other canonical guides—are documented and verifiable (cf. Wookiepedia Biography). Furthermore, the emails between Mr. Bongiorno and Lucasfilm representatives (cf. Google Drive - Correspondence between them) further affirm the novel’s official licensing, prior editorial collaboration, and intended place within the Star Wars Expanded Universe. These factors distinguish Supernatural Encounters from works prohibited under Point 2, rendering it a legitimate case for inclusion.

Under Point 3, the rules advise a case-by-case evaluation of works from smaller publishers. Once more, it must be noted (since this is literally the most important thing in this whole proposal) that although Supernatural Encounters was eventually published under Joe Bongiorno’s imprint, it was originally sanctioned and greenlit within the corporate infrastructure of Lucasfilm Publishing prior to the Disney acquisition of the franchise. Its publication was delayed due to corporate restructuring and the EU/Canon split in 2014 (Explained in the first three paragraphs of Wookiepedia's article on "Legends"), but this delay does not negate the work’s licensure or its production under Lucasfilm's auspices. As such, Supernatural Encounters surpasses the notability threshold expected of minor-publisher works.

As to the Determination of Notability, Point 2 clearly demands that the work be “reasonably notable or popular outside of the versus debating communities.” In that regard, Supernatural Encounters enjoys recognition beyond powerscaling forums. It is actively discussed on long-standing lore preservation channels, such as Stupendous Wave, who has 1.67M subscribers (Examples found here), and referenced in association with other officially published materials like Book of the Sith, The Essential Chronology, and The New Essential Guide to Alien Species—all of which have incorporated elements from Bongiorno’s work and world-building.

As outlined in Point 4 of the Inclusion of Verses section, works created solely for powerscaling are to be excluded. Very clearly, Supernatural Encounters, is not a verse made for such, it is a "mythopoetic" narrative meant to elaborate the origin of the Star Wars mythos, and was in production far before the creation of the "formal" VS community. The story’s thematic and literary aims lie primarily in mythopoeia and philosophical lore expansion, not in tiering.

Finally, though Supernatural Encounters recognizes the entirety of the Star Wars Expanded Universe, Disney Canon and Infinities as canon to itself, the inverse is not true. The novel is not part of the mainline EU canon, nor does it force its narrative assertions upon the broader corpus. This posture of deferential compatibility ensures it does not introduce inconsistencies or usurp established continuity. As per clarification offered directly by the author and corroborated in FAQ sections and direct correspondence (cf. SNE FAQ), the work takes a "one Canon: three Universes" approach in relation to the verse and thus falls well within the purview of verses that may be scaled from, without contravening existing canonical structures.

Conclusion

Making a summary of all thus now said, Supernatural Encounters adheres to the formal Inclusion Rules laid forth by the VS Battles Wiki. Its formal publication, association with a historically significant franchise, recognition beyond the powerscaling communities, and lack of inherent contradictions with accepted rules of inclusion, render it a just and eligible verse for inclusion within the Wiki’s compendium of fictional universes. It's a singular lens through which a conjuction of the three continuities - Expanded Universe, Disney Canon and Infinities (the author himself considers the last two as part of the story) can be read. It is no more contradictory to the continuity than any other number of entries in the verse. If it has remained obscure, it is not for want of quality or licensing, but due to unfortunate circumstances tied to the corporate reconfiguration of the franchise. Its status is thus best described as meta-official: legally licensed, intertextually referenced, and comprehensive—yet not editorially ratified within the final EU timeline.

It is, as such, proposed that Star Wars: Supernatural Encounters be included in the VerSus Battles Wiki as a different continuity for the Star Wars verse that includes the content from the other two continuities without interfering in them.


Agree (6): god_cat, LordVader30, Kenny McCormick 0v0, ZTG0709, BestMGQScalerEver, TegamiBachi25
Neutral (2): Pluto321, Epyriel
Disagree (1): OTG0001
 
Last edited:
It was a very complicated issue and somebody had to clarify it and I think this explanation is quite adequate, I agree
 
I don't agree. It's basically self-published work that originally never went anywhere within the EU. So basically rn for all considerations, it's fanfiction.

I have some tweets from people who worked behind the EU, but I literally cant find the tweets since one guy privated his account, and the other deleted his tweets and moved to bluesky. So that sucks.
 
I don't agree. It's basically self-published work that originally never went anywhere within the EU. So basically rn for all considerations, it's fanfiction.

I addressed that point in the OP. Self-published works can be included in the wiki if certain criteria, which SE happens to fulfil, are met. I also addressed why it didn't go anywhere in the EU - It's licensed, but due to Disney's acquisition of Lucasfilm it was never approved for the final EU timeline (like many other works tbh). That's why my proposal is to make it a separate continuity that includes the others, not something that exists in the Legends continuity.
 
I don't agree. It's basically self-published work that originally never went anywhere within the EU. So basically rn for all considerations, it's fanfiction.

I have some tweets from people who worked behind the EU, but I literally cant find the tweets since one guy privated his account, and the other deleted his tweets and moved to bluesky. So that sucks.

This is already known; in fact, it has been contradicted. The author clearly shows proof that it was reviewed by the editorial team.
 
I addressed that point in the OP. Self-published works can be included in the wiki if certain criteria, which SE happens to fulfil, are met. I also addressed why it didn't go anywhere in the EU - It's licensed, but due to Disney's acquisition of Lucasfilm it was never approved for the final EU timeline (like many other works tbh). That's why my proposal is to make it a separate continuity that includes the others, not something that exists in the Legends continuity.
This is already known; in fact, it has been contradicted. The author clearly shows proof that it was reviewed by the editorial team.
I really just disagree with usage of something that never went anywhere. Ultimately it's up to Lucasfilms whether this stuff gets published as some sort of official material. This has never happened and it just was self-published independently from Lucasfilms even if initially reviewed like a decade past.
 
I really just disagree with usage of something that never went anywhere. Ultimately it's up to Lucasfilms whether this stuff gets published as some sort of official material. This has never happened and it just was self-published independently from Lucasfilms even if initially reviewed like a decade past.
yknow what take away my disagreement I guess this is a weird fringe case that is technically allowed here.
 
Disagree, I'm pretty sure Joe sent the first draft and it was in the midst of review when the transfer was in place, but subsequent drafts were never approved nor sanctioned by Lucasfilm, and were done solely by Joe.

The first draft would indeed fit the criteria you posted, but the second and third iterations of the novelization would be little more than fan-work, and since the first draft is no longer available to the public, we can't use any of the revisions for scaling.

The emails show that there are interactions between Joe and people at Lucasfilm, but they either got nowhere or were in the midst of approval.
 
Disagree, I'm pretty sure Joe sent the first draft and it was in the midst of review when the transfer was in place, but subsequent drafts were never approved nor sanctioned by Lucasfilm, and were done solely by Joe.

The first draft would indeed fit the criteria you posted, but the second and third iterations of the novelization would be little more than fan-work, and since the first draft is no longer available to the public, we can't use any of the revisions for scaling.

The emails show that there are interactions between Joe and people at Lucasfilm, but they either got nowhere or were in the midst of approval.

Even if that was the case, the work is still eligible for inclusion based on the other points I've addressed.
 
Last edited:
the Amazon listing itself attests to SE’s legal status. Were it an unauthorized use of the Star Wars IP, Disney's legal team would have undoubtedly intervened, as they are notoriously swift in striking down infringing materials.
Hmm, no?

Disney isn't omniscient enough to know about all products sold without a license. We had long verses that were removed even though they were legally/officially sold and published by publishers due to copyright infringement.

One of the arguments made was "since the novels are sold legally and officially by a publisher and never received copyright notices, then they're valid," but no, it's still copyright infringement and breaks the rules.

Furthermore, Amazon isn't omniscient either, since, well, sometimes fan fiction appears there.

And even if Disney allowed the publication and/or allowed the author to sell it, that doesn't mean the product is official or valid. There are, for example, countless fangames, fanfilms, or books based on other works that the copyright-holding companies simply allow.

The most obvious example I can give is the countless books sold by Minecraft YouTubers. They tell their own stories, they are sold legally but obviously they are not official for Minecraft itself, they are still fanfic.
 
And even if Disney allowed the publication and/or allowed the author to sell it, that doesn't mean the product is official or valid. There are, for example, countless fangames, fanfilms, or books based on other works that the copyright-holding companies simply allow.

A similar case to S.E then. No issue there. None of this is an impediment to adding it as a separate continuity to the verse per my argument and proposal.
 
A similar case to S.E then.
If it's a similar case, then it's not valid, as stated in the message.

This work was released after Disney's purchase, so you have to demonstrate that Disney considers this book(s) to be official content from the Star Wars franchise.

Even Legends and even Star Wars Infinite, something non-canonical, not made by Disney, have the Disney symbol on reprints attesting to its official status despite being non-canonical. This is something Supernatural Encounters doesn't have.

Even speaking of licensing, some Legends books on Amazon certify the licensing, something Supernatural Encounters doesn't.
-
-
-
It doesn't really matter if it was supposed to be Legends at the time; if it was supposed to be official, that never happened. The company that owns the IP changed.

Supernatural Encounters doesn't have the Disney/Lucasfilm logo like Legends and Infinites to demonstrate its official status. It's not even listed as a "licensed publication" on Amazon, but rather as something independent.

Being officially sold on Amazon or any other legal website doesn't necessarily mean that a piece of media is truly official (we've had verses deleted from the wiki for the same reason) or that it isn't breaking the rules.

EDIT: And even if Disney were kind enough to just allow the author to release/sell the book, it's still against the wiki's rules and doesn't mean anything about it being an official product. Some fangames, fanseries, and fanbooks have something similar, and it's not something we consider valid for the wiki.

The way S.E. was released is no different from the Minecraft books sold by YouTubers out there, and even though each one has their own story and is officially sold by publishers, they aren't eligible for inclusion on the wiki because they still violate copyright rules.
 
Last edited:
Even if that was the case, the work is still eligible for inclusion based on the other points I've addressed.
No it wouldn't, because further revisions were never reviewed by Lucasfilm, hence it would be outside the boundary of what was discussed in the emails Joe sent, that being the first draft. All other drafts were outside Lucasfilm's scope and delegation.

It's like any other cancelled SW novel, we aren't including Escape from Dagu's content in any medium.
 
If it's a similar case, then it's not valid, as stated in the message.

This work was released after Disney's purchase, so you have to demonstrate that Disney considers this book(s) to be official content from the Star Wars franchise.

Even Legends and even Star Wars Infinite, something non-canonical, not made by Disney, have the Disney symbol on reprints attesting to its official status despite being non-canonical. This is something Supernatural Encounters doesn't have.

Even speaking of licensing, some Legends books on Amazon certify the licensing, something Supernatural Encounters doesn't.
-
-
-
It doesn't really matter if it was supposed to be Legends at the time; if it was supposed to be official, that never happened. The company that owns the IP changed.

Supernatural Encounters doesn't have the Disney/Lucasfilm logo like Legends and Infinites to demonstrate its official status. It's not even listed as a "licensed publication" on Amazon, but rather as something independent.

Being officially sold on Amazon or any other legal website doesn't necessarily mean that a piece of media is truly official (we've had verses deleted from the wiki for the same reason) or that it isn't breaking the rules.

EDIT: And even if Disney were kind enough to just allow the author to release/sell the book, it's still against the wiki's rules and doesn't mean anything about it being an official product. Some fangames, fanseries, and fanbooks have something similar, and it's not something we consider valid for the wiki.

The way S.E. was released is no different from the Minecraft books sold by YouTubers out there, and even though each one has their own story and is officially sold by publishers, they aren't eligible for inclusion on the wiki because they still violate copyright rules.

That argument fails on multiple levels.

Supernatural Encounters was not a post-Disney initiative. It was licensed under Lucasfilm during the pre-Disney era, written with editorial oversight, and intended for release in the official Hyperspace platform. The fact that it was delayed and eventually self-released due to Disney’s acquisition does not retroactively remove the licensing status it already had. Disney’s ownership began after the project was well underway and internally greenlit. Your argument treats the transfer of IP rights as a retroactive erasure of existing agreements, which is simply false.

The Disney logo is irrelevant here. Legends novels published before 2014 didn’t carry a Disney logo — and yet they remain official. Even the “Star Wars Infinites” comics you cite were published by Dark Horse, not Disney, and still count. The presence of a logo in modern reprints does not invalidate the original licensed works that never had them.

The claim that it’s “just like Minecraft fanbooks” is absurd. Those were never tied to internal planning, never licensed by Mojang/Microsoft, and never part of the official canon before a corporate transition. Not at all similar to the case here.
 
That argument fails on multiple levels.

Supernatural Encounters was not a post-Disney initiative. It was licensed under Lucasfilm during the pre-Disney era, written with editorial oversight, and intended for release in the official Hyperspace platform. The fact that it was delayed and eventually self-released due to Disney’s acquisition does not retroactively remove the licensing status it already had. Disney’s ownership began after the project was well underway and internally greenlit. Your argument treats the transfer of IP rights as a retroactive erasure of existing agreements, which is simply false.

The Disney logo is irrelevant here. Legends novels published before 2014 didn’t carry a Disney logo — and yet they remain official. Even the “Star Wars Infinites” comics you cite were published by Dark Horse, not Disney, and still count. The presence of a logo in modern reprints does not invalidate the original licensed works that never had them.

The claim that it’s “just like Minecraft fanbooks” is absurd. Those were never tied to internal planning, never licensed by Mojang/Microsoft, and never part of the official canon before a corporate transition. Not at all similar to the case here.
Yea if stuff is actually officially licensed there's not much issue in it being allowed. Not like a new company invalidates all previous licenses.
 
No it wouldn't, because further revisions were never reviewed by Lucasfilm, hence it would be outside the boundary of what was discussed in the emails Joe sent, that being the first draft. All other drafts were outside Lucasfilm's scope and delegation.

It's like any other cancelled SW novel, we aren't including Escape from Dagu's content in any medium.

Not really. SE's final draft was based on the original Lucasfilm-approved outline and manuscript, with the revisions made to expand the core content that had already been vetted. Unlike Escape from Dagu, which never had editorial oversight or final approval.

On a sidenote, I'm fairly sure the first draft is still online.
 
Not really. SE's final draft was based on the original Lucasfilm-approved outline and manuscript, with the revisions made to expand the core content that had already been vetted. Unlike Escape from Dagu, which never had editorial oversight or final approval.

On a sidenote, I'm fairly sure the first draft is still online.
Your claim that Escape from Dagu never had editorial oversight is completely erroneous, the book was vetted and completed but was dropped for Dark Rendezvous.

In fact, it actually got more approval (if it was completed) than Supernatural Encounters. Also your argument that subsequent revisions that Joe did outside the boundaries of Lucasfilm approval doesn't address the fact that the subsequent releases were never approved. Also Matt Martin and Pablo Hidalgo have vehemently disagreed with SE passing even the most basic stages of approval and have expressed that it shouldn't be used for anything. The higher ups deny involvement and it being anything of substance, that's more than enough evidence to show it's a fan novel and nothing more.
 
Supernatural Encounters was not a post-Disney initiative. It was licensed under Lucasfilm during the pre-Disney era, written with editorial oversight, and intended for release in the official Hyperspace platform. The fact that it was delayed and eventually self-released due to Disney’s acquisition does not retroactively remove the licensing status it already had. Disney’s ownership began after the project was well underway and internally greenlit. Your argument treats the transfer of IP rights as a retroactive erasure of existing agreements, which is simply false.
I didn't say it was a post-Disney deal (unless the translator screwed me over). And of course it literally changes—the owner of the IP changed, and they changed the entire structure of Star Wars.

There's no reason why an agreement made by the previous owner of an IP that was never actually used (a canceled and never released work) should be valid today, especially when the author uses post-Disney elements in their work.

Wookipedia (which you use as a source) states that over the decades, the author expanded/improved/corrected the S.E. (meaning the S.E. of today is not the same as the one agreed upon decades ago), to the point where he used post-Disney elements (SW Rebels) in his book.
Over the subsequent years, Bongiorno continued to work on the Supernatural Encounters novella, beyond its original commission, to add content related to Legends works released since the closure of Hyperspace, such as the novel series Star Wars: Fate of the Jedi, and he has incorporated elements from the canon continuity that followed the acquisition of Lucasfilm by Disney, namely the Star Wars Rebels television series.

The agreement initially made in the early 2000s has nothing to do with what he implemented later. Unless, of course, you have some source from Disney licensing this content for him to use.

The Disney logo is irrelevant here. Legends novels published before 2014 didn’t carry a Disney logo — and yet they remain official. Even the “Star Wars Infinites” comics you cite were published by Dark Horse, not Disney, and still count. The presence of a logo in modern reprints does not invalidate the original licensed works that never had them.
Legends and Infinite now have the Disney/Lucasfilm logo. Do you know why? Because even though they predate Disney, Disney still considers them official, validly licensed, and part of the Star Wars IP.

Legends, Infinite, Visions—all of them either have the company logo or are described as officially licensed. That's why these continuities are valid and S.E. is not.

Yea if stuff is actually officially licensed there's not much issue in it being allowed. Not like a new company invalidates all previous licenses.
Do you think that in the agreement made in the 2000s the licensing agreement included post-Disney/Rebels content even though this wasn't even a thing that existed yet?
 
I agree with those above that is it basically fanfiction and not part of anything official, but I agree with the OP that its publicity as a cult favourite even outside powerscaling communities is good enough popularity wise as its own self published work.

Edit: Put me as neutral for now.
 
Last edited:
is good enough for it to be listed on site as its own self published work.
The problem is that this applies to works that don't violate copyright.

Basically, if I start posting something original on Wattpad and it becomes popular enough to be included on the wiki.

It doesn't matter if the work is extremely popular and even sold officially by a publisher or website. If the work contains characters or content taken from another IP without an official license, it's not permitted.

You yourself agree that it's "basically fanfic."
 
The problem is that this applies to works that don't violate copyright.

Basically, if I start posting something original on Wattpad and it becomes popular enough to be included on the wiki.


It doesn't matter if the work is extremely popular and even sold officially by a publisher or website. If the work contains characters or content taken from another IP without an official license, it's not permitted.

You yourself agree that it's "basically fanfic."
I mean if the issue is just IP license, I imagine the fact that it went through LFL is good enough in that regard for the wiki’s sake?

Lorewise it might as well be fanfiction, but at least did originally get the license to use EU materials. Although I’m not a copyright lawyer.

I guess it depends how ‘official’ the wiki wants for such works. Are there any other cases like this the wiki has ruled on?
 
I imagine the fact that it went through LFL is good enough in that regard for the wiki’s sake?
Are you talking about Amazon? Amazon isn't omniscient, I've already shown that sometimes fanfics are passed through there (I showed one about Frozen), and as I said, even if it were the special case that Disney let the author publish/sell this content, that's not the same as an official license, which is what's needed.

Lorewise it might as well be fanfiction, but at least did originally get the license to use EU materials. Although I’m not a copyright lawyer.
Besides being said to be an old agreement before Disney, the problem is that the version of S.E. agreed upon in the early 2000s is not the same as the one released a few years ago.

Using Wookipedia.
Over the subsequent years, Bongiorno continued to work on the Supernatural Encounters novella, beyond its original commission, to add content related to Legends works released since the closure of Hyperspace, such as the novel series Star Wars: Fate of the Jedi, and he has incorporated elements from the canon continuity that followed the acquisition of Lucasfilm by Disney, namely the Star Wars Rebels television series.

So even if that license were valid, it would be for basically the version at that time, and not for the officially released version.
. Are there any other cases like this the wiki has ruled on?
Are you talking about VS Battle? I remember Blue & White. A huge Chinese verse with its novels officially sold by a publisher/website, but it was removed due to copyright issues. But that situation was basically an extreme of what I'm discussing here. If you want to see the mods' conversation, I can send you the link to its message wall.
 
Are you talking about Amazon? Amazon isn't omniscient, I've already shown that sometimes fanfics are passed through there (I showed one about Frozen), and as I said, even if it were the special case that Disney let the author publish/sell this content, that's not the same as an official license, which is what's needed.


Besides being said to be an old agreement before Disney, the problem is that the version of S.E. agreed upon in the early 2000s is not the same as the one released a few years ago.

Using Wookipedia.


So even if that license were valid, it would be for basically the version at that time, and not for the officially released version.

Are you talking about VS Battle? I remember Blue & White. A huge Chinese verse with its novels officially sold by a publisher/website, but it was removed due to copyright issues. But that situation was basically an extreme of what I'm discussing here. If you want to see the mods' conversation, I can send you the link to its message wall.
Yea I think I disagree with the OP again.
 
Are you talking about Amazon? Amazon isn't omniscient, I've already shown that sometimes fanfics are passed through there (I showed one about Frozen), and as I said, even if it were the special case that Disney let the author publish/sell this content, that's not the same as an official license, which is what's needed.
Not Amazon. LFL stands for Lucasfilm Licensing, the process all SW works go through for initial approval and licensing.

Besides being said to be an old agreement before Disney, the problem is that the version of S.E. agreed upon in the early 2000s is not the same as the one released a few years ago.

Using Wookipedia.

So even if that license were valid, it would be for basically the version at that time, and not for the officially released version.
As far as I’m aware, giving the author the license for works like this is fairly early in development is fairly common?

Technically you could argue the license stays through the buyout as Disney acquired all of Lucasfims (and not just the IP) and kept them in charge of such projects.

Are you talking about VS Battle? I remember Blue & White. A huge Chinese verse with its novels officially sold by a publisher/website, but it was removed due to copyright issues. But that situation was basically an extreme of what I'm discussing here. If you want to see the mods' conversation, I can send you the link to its message wall.
Yes, but I guess I’m hoping for a more similar case of a tangential property with initial licensing permit but no official release.

I guess for now you can put me as neutral.
 
Last edited:
Not Amazon. LFL stands for Lucasfilm Licensing, the process all SW works go through for initial approval and licensing.
That's why I used the argument of logos or Amazon's description.

As far as I’m aware, giving the author the license for works like this is fairly in development is fairly common?

Technically you could argue the license stays through the buyout as Disney acquired all of Lucasfims (and not just the IP) and kept them in charge of such projects.
I mean, besides the implementation of post-Disney stuff that I don't know if was included in the licensing (because I don't think anyone here has the contract).

New versions of the story would still need to go through editorial reviews, something that doesn't seem to have happened?

Yes, but I guess I’m hoping for a more similar case of a tangential property with initial licensing permit but no official release.
Unfortunately, the rules don't address copyright issues very much. There's very little, and everything I'm talking about here is based on reading threads of verses that were deleted for "violating copyright even though they were popular and released by a publisher/website."
 
Back
Top