• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Banning Edutyn's Bad Calculations AKA The Disastrous Calcs Of Saki K. (OC Do Not Steal)

PhantomØ4

Username Only
Messages
2,248
Reaction score
1,485
Heyo, so basically I noticed that a lot of the Saki K calcs currently used in the profile are rather...questionable. This has been addressed years back but the thread fell through due to interest. I also borrowed the name from a previous thread by Don'tTalk.

I would honestly suggest nulling the user's calcs verse and from making any more calculations at least regarding this verse (but I would not be surprised if their other calcs are equally as bad) as it is honestly astonishing the (at best) just how unqualified they are or (at worst) just intentional misportrayal in the feats and reliance on CGMS overlooking them.

Saiki flies across the world.
Saiki causes an explosion
Saiki disperses a typhoon
0.0X frames per second... in an anime where animators only draw 24 frames per second usually on doubles, even in games they don't generate a fraction of a frame. This should be self explanatory. The person calcing them use SMPTE to justify 0.13 frames by totally misreading the format which is indicating hours, minutes, seconds and frame. This effectively x100s almost every single speed result reliant on frames and x10,000 the kinetic energy. Honesty find it hard to believe this was not on purpose as you have to look up what the format is to know it references frames at all.

More recently he has began misreading the format as hundredths of a second for no apparent reason at all like here:

Saiki kicks limiter into space and deflects a meteor

My best guess is that it's very much intentional as 0.01 seconds is better than 1/24ths of a second (~0.0416 seconds) or 0.16 seconds being much better than 16/24 (0.666 seconds) and his previous 0.XX frames per second raised red flags far too easily as when pressed about finding a tenth of a frame by damage they attempted to play it off by claiming "I think I expressed myself wrong, using Filmora (Video Editor) the line appeared in 0.01 seconds. Then I used that time and the fps from the anime" when he had repeatedly used the last digits as fractions of frames doing things like:

0.01 frames / 24 fps

But since they could not justify it they fell back on tenths of a second. I am saying this is intentional as he had demonstrated knowledge of what the the last two digits in SMPTE format represnted... it's also very obvious in the editing program he uses as 00 only goes up to 24 before changing the second. You'd have to be incredibly forgetful and unqualified to do calculations or be intentionally doing this to elevate results by a significant margin.

Explosion of volcano
Extrapolated distress signals from Japanese warning systems taking from one to twenty seconds to reach receivers upon being sent and people still evacuating to mean the entire volume of calculated pyroclastic flow (which was calculated by treating it the same as a storm... which is also wrong) was released at once at speeds exceeding 1% the speed of light.

Presumes this is an accurate representation of the lava in a volcano exploding outwards. Completely messes up lining up the thing with the planet and proceeds with the calc anyways... and doesn't even bother in understanding how volcano eruptions work or earth is laid out as he then proceeds to take that all of this lava had to travel from edge to edge in the same timeframe as before.


This apparently is also enough for a magnitude 8 earthquake on the Richter scale.

Saiki vaporizes 7 km with a punch
Straight up doesn't even line up the measurement line with what he claims to be measuring, giving up 3/4ths of the way. Ignores the resulting crater being incredibly shallow compared to the radius he used and proceeds to treat it as a semi-cylinder.

Saiki dodges alternate Saiki
Calc staking to the horizon and back from characters to are relative to each other IN ADDITION to calculating the speed of an attack from relative characters like this: Thrown punch -> Evade -> Shockwave then destroys background -> Shockwave must have traveled that distance in the same amount of time it took dodge. He has re-posted this calc several times over 2 years indicating that he truly does not see any issue in this logic.

Typhoon dispersion

Anime canonicity aside... "Low End: 5.1884561e+15kg/0.0036s= 1.4412378e+18kg" based on effects to the mass being shown to start being visible at 0.0036? Force = m * a not Force = m / time
It also maximum elevation of a typhoon's top as the thickness of the typhoon clouds (unsourced so I had to look into what they used too) which are colombinous clouds with are generally accepted to average about half that thickness on vsbw.
As a plus the calculation completely ignored the fact that it is visually obvious the typhoon divides into several sections that have much lower speeds each as the center of the typhoon never reaches the measured distance and the clouds that do reach the measured distance are only the outer edge of the typhoon, this goes beyond the omnidirectional kinetic energy formula.

Saki does standard cloud dispersion

"Thunderstorm mass= 167,702,794,067.00543 kg 167,702,794,067.00543*1,003kg= 1.682059e+14 kg" You cannot be fr right now. The calculation multiplied the mass of the clouds by the density of water to get the mass of the clouds. In addition to that the feat was added by him unto the profile without any CGM approving it.

Saiki K meteor ending and its original version

Measures the luminosity given off by the meteor from an aesthetic shit as if it was meteor itself... conveniently cherry picking shots to get the highest result as the meteor would basically already be impacting planet earth but then they use ang sizing in the space shot to find that the meteor (with an in verse estimated impact time of 2 hours from that point) is actually moving at 1 million meters per second.


Saiki kicks his limiter into space

The timeframe issue aside the assumptions this calc makes are also weird as they assume that the object traveled the total measured distance in the time it took for the object to be out of sight... in addition to matter that if the object is burning up in the atmosphere the perspective of the calc is likely just skewed and it is within the atmosphere and unfit for angular methods.

Saiki K defelcts a metor

It seems they'll just try their luck at what gets past CGMS because they are doing the long way round to directly measure the meteor which is much closer to the camera than the earth using the earth in a non-straightforward way by using angular size. Then suddenly they pull a km/px ratio out of nowhere for the panel height "Panel Height 720px= 31839.4191449m/px" to apply to distance not explaining they actually used the earth as frame of reference for the distance moved no different from using the earth and getting m/px from there... just hidden behind unnecessary methodology.

Saiki K destroys the moon 1

Here they don't explain the shot is actually a still frame and say "it took a second due to the dynamics of the scene", again hoping a CGM that doesn't care enough will come by and approve the arithmetic. They multiply Saki's traveled distance in that one second... just because basically? The reasoning is that Saki's travel path went beyond the moon which at best refers to his his aura which extends a couple of meters behind saki as it is very clear. Anyways, all these issues only to get Saki's travel speed which he then applies to the mass of the missing chunk of the moon (which is also calculated wrong as a whole left in the moon is not a sphere) to get the kinetic energy as if Saki had launched that whole chunk of the moon at that same speed which is visually untrue in the shown frame and the chunks we do see seem to just be small fragments of the moon close to Saki.

Saiki destroys the moon 2 and 3

Does the same timeframe trick here, though this one might be his tamest calc but still calculates a hole in the moon as a spherical object which is wrong.

Saiki erases a country

Calculates a very self evidently small explosion as country level because Saiki calls them a " "nation" " INCLUDING THE PARENTHESIS. This is currently part of the justification in the profile...

Saiki K splits the earth

F = W/s ? From where exactly?

3DS Explosion feat

0.0X frames issue. Also calculates the yield of an explosion on a curved surface based on a flat reference which results in inflated results as the reference gets elongated as it gets further way from the equator. Google earthing point to point yields about 5,000 km instead (~Manilla to the Russian peninsula). Additionally the thing being measured for the explosion formula is no longer is the explosion itself but rocks being raised from the earth's surface that do not even follow the sphere-like are of an explosion that are used as a reference

Kusuke gets yeeted into a wall

Assumed pulverization of steel for a feat very clearly containing 0 pulverization, specially using the large AoE he measured which at best shows fragmentation values... depth value for the crater is simply an unfounded a reach.

Saiki K calls down a meteor

Uses earth curvature line up that makes Hokkaido be larger than California in addition to using the earth as reference to a meteor that is much closer to the camera, resulting in a meteor that is a meter across as seen in the anime to be the size of a small country. This is despite Don't Talk previously advising him against him measuring foreground elements with background ones (and every feat where he has done this is post this comment)

Saiki K flies to America

Uses blatant cinematic timing instead of visual showing of the feat in addition to having the SMPTE format.


^ These are about all of his Saiki K calcs over 2 years that are not something ridiculous and irrelevant and about all of them have at least one large major issue. I do believe that it is a combination of being unqualified and purposely misleading to attain the largest end possible and as such I do think he should stay off calculations pertaining the verse.

I did peek at 5 of his other calcs to see if it was the same for those and as far as I could tell those have a similar pattern but I do not care for them working in other verses.
 
Last edited:
I'll try to look at "wrong calcs" section whenever I get enough free time.

For now "0.0x frames" part of the OP seems fine to me.
 
Heyo, so basically I noticed that a lot of the Saki K calcs currently used in the profile are rather...questionable. This has been addressed years back but the thread fell through due to interest. I also borrowed the name from a previous thread by Don'tTalk.

I would honestly suggest nulling the user's calcs verse and from making any more calculations at least regarding this verse (but I would not be surprised if their other calcs are equally as bad) as it is honestly astonishing the (at best) just how unqualified they are or (at worst) just intentional misportrayal in the feats and reliance on CGMS overlooking them.

Saiki flies across the world.
Saiki causes an explosion
Saiki disperses a typhoon
0.0X frames per second... in an anime where animators only draw 24 frames per second usually on doubles, even in games they don't generate a fraction of a frame. This should be self explanatory. The person calcing them use SMPTE to justify 0.13 frames by totally misreading the format which is indicating hours, minutes, seconds and frame. This effectively x100s almost every single speed result reliant on frames and x10,000 the kinetic energy. Honesty find it hard to believe this was not on purpose as you have to look up what the format is to know it references frames at all.

More recently he has began misreading the format as hundredths of a second for no apparent reason at all like here:
Tbh, i didn't even knew what SMPTE was.

Many of those calculations, mainly the first three and/or iterations thereof, were made when I had little experience with calculations. I simply looked at other calculations to guide me more or less.

In this case, I saw how a calculation of MP100 used 0.01s based on WatchFrameByFrame, so I decided to use the same method with Filmora. Now that I look at them closely, the calculations are really wrong, and I have to redo them and to be honest, I don't even know how I did some things.
Saiki kicks limiter into space and deflects a meteor

My best guess is that it's very much intentional as 0.01 seconds is better than 1/24ths of a second (~0.0416 seconds) or 0.16 seconds being much better than 16/24 (0.666 seconds) and his previous 0.XX frames per second raised red flags far too easily as when pressed about finding a tenth of a frame by damage they attempted to play it off by claiming "I think I expressed myself wrong, using Filmora (Video Editor) the line appeared in 0.01 seconds. Then I used that time and the fps from the anime" when he had repeatedly used the last digits as fractions of frames doing things like:

0.01 frames / 24 fps

But since they could not justify it they fell back on tenths of a second. I am saying this is intentional as he had demonstrated knowledge of what the the last two digits in SMPTE format represnted... it's also very obvious in the editing program he uses as 00 only goes up to 24 before changing the second. You'd have to be incredibly forgetful and unqualified to do calculations or be intentionally doing this to elevate results by a significant margin.
Regarding the first one:

Simply apply the same case I saw with the MP100 calculation, since obviously the feat happened faster than 1/24s. Given that at that moment, Saiki's limiter came off, causing his powers and strength to increase greatly (literally a simple touch of his foot launched his limiter to space).

Although I understand your concerns, I can add a low end using 1 frame.

About the second one:

I simply copied it from an old calculation I made, corrected a FEW things that were wrong, one of them being the timeframe, and another was calculating the size of the meteorite using Ang Size (I even said in the calculation that I thought it was wrong for obvious reasons).
Explosion of volcano
Extrapolated distress signals from Japanese warning systems taking from one to twenty seconds to reach receivers upon being sent and people still evacuating to mean the entire volume of calculated pyroclastic flow (which was calculated by treating it the same as a storm... which is also wrong) was released at once at speeds exceeding 1% the speed of light.
I don't think it's entirely wrong (apart from the timing) how he calculates the mass. Saiki describes the event as one that will lead Japan to ruin, PF will cover the entire country from end to end (in the manga it shows how Japan is completely covered and in the anime it shows how Japan gradually darkens), and naturally, since PF is denser than air, it will fall, and since one of the scans shows that it is still in the air, I simply added them together to get the height.

The only thing I think could be wrong is the density.

Presumes this is an accurate representation of the lava in a volcano exploding outwards. Completely messes up lining up the thing with the planet and proceeds with the calc anyways... and doesn't even bother in understanding how volcano eruptions work or earth is laid out as he then proceeds to take that all of this lava had to travel from edge to edge in the same timeframe as before.

Okay, I admit that this is wrong. I was really tired when I finished the calculation and forgot to check it, so yes, this has to go.


This apparently is also enough for a magnitude 8 earthquake on the Richter scale.

You literally skipped over the fact that I mentioned that the buildings were shaking and that Saiki's house is 485 km from the epicenter of the earthquake, and yet it still suffered damage from it. (Besides, we are in Japan, a country with many earthquakes and whose infrastructure has adapted to them).
Saiki vaporizes 7 km with a punch
Straight up doesn't even line up the measurement line with what he claims to be measuring, giving up 3/4ths of the way. Ignores the resulting crater being incredibly shallow compared to the radius he used and proceeds to treat it as a semi-cylinder.
Simply use the same method as here + never actually finish the calculation.
Saiki dodges alternate Saiki
Calc staking to the horizon and back from characters to are relative to each other IN ADDITION to calculating the speed of an attack from relative characters like this: Thrown punch -> Evade -> Shockwave then destroys background -> Shockwave must have traveled that distance in the same amount of time it took dodge. He has re-posted this calc several times over 2 years indicating that he truly does not see any issue in this logic.
That's called “I copied and pasted” an old calculation and forgot to fix it. Furthermore, Kusuo is declared to be FTL by the author + we have a canon multiplier that says his stats are AT LEAST 100x higher. Alt Kusuo he removed the limiter to beat OG Kusuo. That's because he used x100.

Also, OG Kusuo dodge it via IA

Typhoon dispersion

Anime canonicity aside... "Low End: 5.1884561e+15kg/0.0036s= 1.4412378e+18kg" based on effects to the mass being shown to start being visible at 0.0036? Force = m * a not Force = m / time
It also maximum elevation of a typhoon's top as the thickness of the typhoon clouds (unsourced so I had to look into what they used too) which are colombinous clouds with are generally accepted to average about half that thickness on vsbw.
Yeah, i dont' even kwow what i did there, so this calc is wrong
As a plus the calculation completely ignored the fact that it is visually obvious the typhoon divides into several sections that have much lower speeds each as the center of the typhoon never reaches the measured distance and the clouds that do reach the measured distance are only the outer edge of the typhoon, this goes beyond the omnidirectional kinetic energy formula.
TBH, i didn't notice that
Saki does standard cloud dispersion

"Thunderstorm mass= 167,702,794,067.00543 kg 167,702,794,067.00543*1,003kg= 1.682059e+14 kg" You cannot be fr right now. The calculation multiplied the mass of the clouds by the density of water to get the mass of the clouds. In addition to that the feat was added by him unto the profile without any CGM approving it.
Obviously this calculation is wrong, and if you had really seen other calculations as you said, you would have realized that I redid it (although I have to change the thickness px).
Saiki K meteor ending and its original version

Measures the luminosity given off by the meteor from an aesthetic shit as if it was meteor itself...
I just take the white inner part of the meteorite, since it's the only part that isn't deformed. And tbh, it's really hard to calculate its size.
conveniently cherry picking shots to get the highest result as the meteor would basically already be impacting planet earth but then they use ang sizing in the space shot to find that the meteor (with an in verse estimated impact time of 2 hours from that point) is actually moving at 1 million meters per second.
The calculation is obviously wrong, for that reason I never finished it.
Saiki kicks his limiter into space

The timeframe issue aside the assumptions this calc makes are also weird as they assume that the object traveled the total measured distance in the time it took for the object to be out of sight... in addition to matter that if the object is burning up in the atmosphere the perspective of the calc is likely just skewed and it is within the atmosphere and unfit for angular methods.
Alredy, explained this
Saiki K defelcts a metor

It seems they'll just try their luck at what gets past CGMS because they are doing the long way round to directly measure the meteor which is much closer to the camera than the earth using the earth in a non-straightforward way by using angular size. Then suddenly they pull a km/px ratio out of nowhere for the panel height "Panel Height 720px= 31839.4191449m/px" to apply to distance not explaining they actually used the earth as frame of reference for the distance moved no different from using the earth and getting m/px from there... just hidden behind unnecessary methodology.
Same as above
Saiki K destroys the moon 1

Here they don't explain the shot is actually a still frame and say "it took a second due to the dynamics of the scene", again hoping a CGM that doesn't care enough will come by and approve the arithmetic. They multiply Saki's traveled distance in that one second... just because basically? The reasoning is that Saki's travel path went beyond the moon which at best refers to his his aura which extends a couple of meters behind saki as it is very clear. Anyways, all these issues only to get Saki's travel speed which he then applies to the mass of the missing chunk of the moon (which is also calculated wrong as a whole left in the moon is not a sphere) to get the kinetic energy as if Saki had launched that whole chunk of the moon at that same speed which is visually untrue in the shown frame and the chunks we do see seem to just be small fragments of the moon close to Saki.

Saiki destroys the moon 2 and 3

Does the same timeframe trick here, though this one might be his tamest calc but still calculates a hole in the moon as a spherical object which is wrong.
SAme as meteor redux calc, the calcs are obviously wrong, for that reason I never finished them
Saiki erases a country

Calculates a very self evidently small explosion as country level because Saiki calls them a " "nation" " INCLUDING THE PARENTHESIS. This is currently part of the justification in the profile...
No, you're wrong about this part. The profile explanation talks about him explaining how he "eresed" a country. I tried to calculate that feat based on the explosion you see, but near the end I realized it was obviously wrong and gave up.
Saiki K splits the earth

F = W/s ? From where exactly?
I saw a calc from One Piece that uses this, so I applied the same criteria. Besides, I only calculated this to see the result; the feat is not valid because it is from the opening.
3DS Explosion feat

0.0X frames issue. Also calculates the yield of an explosion on a curved surface based on a flat reference which results in inflated results as the reference gets elongated as it gets further way from the equator. Google earthing point to point yields about 5,000 km instead (~Manilla to the Russian peninsula). Additionally the thing being measured for the explosion formula is no longer is the explosion itself but rocks being raised from the earth's surface that do not even follow the sphere-like are of an explosion that are used as a reference
Yeah, i need to redo this
Kusuke gets yeeted into a wall

Assumed pulverization of steel for a feat very clearly containing 0 pulverization, specially using the large AoE he measured which at best shows fragmentation values... depth value for the crater is simply an unfounded a reach.
That's my fault for not providing context for the scene. Basically, Kusuo gives Kusuke a “gentle” push that sends him crashing into the wall in the process (both in the manga and anime, you can see a lot of smoke).
Saiki K calls down a meteor

Uses earth curvature line up that makes Hokkaido be larger than California in addition to using the earth as reference to a meteor that is much closer to the camera, resulting in a meteor that is a meter across as seen in the anime to be the size of a small country. This is despite Don't Talk previously advising him against him measuring foreground elements with background ones (and every feat where he has done this is post this comment)
Yes, if this is wrong, I will recalculate it using a later scene.
Saiki K flies to America

Uses blatant cinematic timing instead of visual showing of the feat in addition to having the SMPTE format.
Same as above
These are about all of his Saiki K calcs over 2 years that are not something ridiculous and irrelevant and about all of them have at least one large major issue. I do believe that it is a combination of being unqualified and purposely misleading to attain the largest end possible and as such I do think he should stay off calculations pertaining the verse.
No, you're wrong here. These calculations and/or iterations of them are what I did in my first year on the wiki. I had little experience in how to do calculations and simply copied what I saw others doing. I simply abandoned some of the calculations you mentioned because I realized they were wrong, and since I didn't know how to delete blogs at the time, I just left them there and forgot about them. While other calc I tried to remade them but forgot for IRL stuff (college)
I don't think it's fair to ban me from verse for a mistake I made when I was inexperienced, especially since many of them will be turning three years old soon.

If you want, I can try to recalculate everything now that I have more experience and enough free time.

But that will be decided by the staff.
I did peek at 5 of his other calcs to see if it was the same for those and as far as I could tell those have a similar pattern but I do not care for them working in other verses.
Tell me what calcs you saw? Because there is a big difference between the calcs I made three years ago and the ones I made now. So I'm asking you can tell me.

Also, Merry Christmas to all of you! 🎄
 
No, you're wrong here. These calculations and/or iterations of them are what I did in my first year on the wiki. I had little experience in how to do calculations and simply copied what I saw others doing. I simply abandoned some of the calculations you mentioned because I realized they were wrong, and since I didn't know how to delete blogs at the time, I just left them there and forgot about them. While other calc I tried to remade them but forgot for IRL stuff (college)

I went from the first page of your blogs to the last checking re-dos, original versions... I checked the most recent Mob Psycho compilation alongside delta rune calcs, but I do not care much for those with several calc compilation redos being from this very same year.

So yeah. I spent about 6 hours reading and deciphering your calcs as you have a messy workflow that sometimes just pulls numbers out of the thin air... but I basically checked from this year to the first blogs you attempted, this is not just your old blogs.

Over the course of these two years you have not done a single calculation besides the very mild and simple moon feats (that still have mistakes, though mild) that lacked a very obvious arithmetic mistake which inflated the results or demonstrated that you do not grasp the concept behind calcs properly... and thus not apt to be making calcs for the verse at the very least due to consistent untrustworthiness. Specially considering you are a college student.

Proof enough of this being your counter arguments such as:
Simply apply the same case I saw with the MP100 calculation, since obviously the feat happened faster than 1/24s. Given that at that moment, Saiki's limiter came off, causing his powers and strength to increase greatly (literally a simple touch of his foot launched his limiter to space).

Although I understand your concerns, I can add a low end using 1 frame.
You literally skipped over the fact that I mentioned that the buildings were shaking and that Saiki's house is 485 km from the epicenter of the earthquake, and yet it still suffered damage from it. (Besides, we are in Japan, a country with many earthquakes and whose infrastructure has adapted to them).
I don't think it's entirely wrong (apart from the timing) how he calculates the mass. Saiki describes the event as one that will lead Japan to ruin, PF will cover the entire country from end to end (in the manga it shows how Japan is completely covered and in the anime it shows how Japan gradually darkens), and naturally, since PF is denser than air, it will fall, and since one of the scans shows that it is still in the air, I simply added them together to get the height.

The only thing I think could be wrong is the density.
Simply use the same method as here + never actually finish the calculation.
That's my fault for not providing context for the scene. Basically, Kusuo gives Kusuke a “gentle” push that sends him crashing into the wall in the process (both in the manga and anime, you can see a lot of smoke).
I just take the white inner part of the meteorite, since it's the only part that isn't deformed. And tbh, it's really hard to calculate its size.

After 2 going on 3 years and 26 pages worth of calculations you do not understand:
  • The fact that using one frame is not a "low end" it's the lowest unit of time we can measure and you pulling a random number because it's probably less than that is unequivocally wrong. (I also do not believe you genuinely did it for this reason. I think you are lying here given that your justification since 2 years ago linked proof in your editing software misreading the last digit... which before you knew indicated frames but you seemingly forgot and meant seconds after damage called you out)
  • How FPS work
  • How the earthquake formula is ought to be used It doesn't matter if it was a billion kilometers away, the formula accounts for that distance and seeks the magnitude at that given distance. The earthquake at that distance is not more than an intensity 3 or 4 at 485 km with what's shown.
  • Do basic research and use common sense to know how PF works and see why calculating the kinetic energy of the entire mass being ejected at any given speed at once s wrong given that PF ejection lasts tens of minutes to days depending on the size of the event... and no, people evacuating does not denote this is a fast event as you are talking about evacuating 120 million people off an island which is simply an unreasonable ask even over the course of days.
  • Cannot use critical thinking skills to determine a simple shape depicted in a scene and know it's wrong nor can you see that your pixel measurements of the reference are at least 25% off from what you are measuring regardless of if you finished the math or not.
  • Mistake dust kicked off from the ground in front of a character as proof of pulverizing steel behind him that lacks any sort of dust indication and actually very clearly depicts the steel wall having been dented/fragmented.
  • Cannot use logical thinking skills to see that what you measured is the luminosity towards the camera (as the shot is stylized) being given off by the meteorite and not the meteorite itself... no meteorite turns white.
Obviously this calculation is wrong, and if you had really seen other calculations as you said, you would have realized that I redid it (although I have to change the thickness px).

Oops, I meant to link that one too. I did see it. Bear with me, I actually checked all of your calculations' logic and mathematics which took literal hours. This is just one more instance for nulling your calcs:

1. You measured a point which is severely skewed due to perspective as the camera is set at an angle.
2. You used nimbostratus without explanation despite the fact that these are stratocumulus clouds, with them being nimbostratus being made simply impossible by the fact that when the clouds are cleared you can see cumulus clouds floating above... making it a physical impossibility given the expected thickness of nimbostratus and their average elevation compared to cumulus besides their obvious visual look.

I don't think it's fair to ban me from verse for a mistake I made when I was inexperienced, especially since many of them will be turning three years old soon.

The reason I proposed a ban from further calcs (at least relating to this verse) is due to your consistent unreliability in interpreting and applying concepts in the calculations over the period of almost 3 years. Regardless of calc's status as re-dos or not. These are quite literally ALL of your calcs pertaining to the verse and absolutely all have at least one significant issue (minus the moon ones which is have rather mild ones).

It takes hours to check calcs if you check them throughly so CGMs often end up overlooking things if you try again and again with a lot just checking arithmetic, I just do not think you can be trusted for calculating things.

I am happy with just nulling your calculations but I would not trust you to be reliable
 
Over the course of these two years you have not done a single calculation besides the very mild and simple moon feats (that still have mistakes, though mild) that lacked a very obvious arithmetic mistake which inflated the results or demonstrated that you do not grasp the concept behind calcs properly... and thus not apt to be making calcs for the verse at the very least due to consistent untrustworthiness.
Can you tell me which ones you think are wrong (Aside from the Saiki ones)? PERSONALLY, I feel that from mid-2024 onwards, I improved considerably in making calculations.
Specially considering you are a college student.
Actually, I entered college this year. When I did the calcs, I was 15/16 years old.
After 2 going on 3 years and 26 pages worth of calculations you do not understand:
  • The fact that using one frame is not a "low end" it's the lowest unit of time we can measure and you pulling a random number because it's probably less than that is unequivocally wrong.
Technically speaking, feats with times less than 1 frame can be calculated.
  • (I also do not believe you genuinely did it for this reason. I think you are lying here given that your justification since 2 years ago linked proof in your editing software misreading the last digit... which before you knew indicated frames but you seemingly forgot and meant seconds after damage called you out)
To be completely honest, it was genuinely my mistake when reading the editor. When doing the subsequent calculations, I simply carried over the error because I forgot to link the feat to the profile (since I used to look at previous calculations I made and check other users calcs to guide me as I was new).
  • How FPS work
Honestly, I don't understand your point. Could you explain it to me?
  • How the earthquake formula is ought to be used It doesn't matter if it was a billion kilometers away, the formula accounts for that distance and seeks the magnitude at that given distance. The earthquake at that distance is not more than an intensity 3 or 4 at 485 km with what's shown.
Fine? I guest. Although, based on the explanation in the table, I now think that instead of magnitude 8, it may be 5/6.

Felt by all, and many are frightened. Some heavy furniture is moved; a few instances of fallen plaster occur. Damage is slight.
Damage is negligible in buildings of good design and construction; but slight to moderate in well-built ordinary structures; damage is considerable in poorly built or badly designed structures; some chimneys are broken. Noticed by motorists.
Given that Saiki's house seems to be very well designed, i lean toward 6
  • Do basic research and use common sense to know how PF works and see why calculating the kinetic energy of the entire mass being ejected at any given speed at once s wrong given that PF ejection lasts tens of minutes to days depending on the size of the event... and no, people evacuating does not denote this is a fast event as you are talking about evacuating 120 million people off an island which is simply an unreasonable ask even over the course of days.
It's probably due to a misinterpretation. I interpreted the scene as meaning that even Japan's top leadership couldn't escape, even though they should have had the information instantly. But, yeah, you're probably right
  • Cannot use critical thinking skills to determine a simple shape depicted in a scene and know it's wrong nor can you see that your pixel measurements of the reference are at least 25% off from what you are measuring regardless of if you finished the math or not.
Can you explain what feat you're referring to? If it's the meteorite, I understand, but if it's the cloud:
Obviously this calculation is wrong, and if you had really seen other calculations as you said, you would have realized that I redid it (although I have to change the thickness px)
  • Mistake dust kicked off from the ground in front of a character as proof of pulverizing steel behind him that lacks any sort of dust indication and actually very clearly depicts the steel wall having been dented/fragmented
Kusuke's laboratory looks extremely clean, and both the manga (and especially the anime) show that nothing was left of the wall where Kusuke was.

According to wiki standards, this is pulverization.
  • Cannot use logical thinking skills to see that what you measured is the luminosity towards the camera (as the shot is stylized) being given off by the meteorite and not the meteorite itself... no meteorite turns white.
Fine
Oops, I meant to link that one too. I did see it. Bear with me, I actually checked all of your calculations' logic and mathematics which took literal hours. This is just one more instance for nulling your calcs:

1. You measured a point which is severely skewed due to perspective as the camera is set at an angle.
Obviously this calculation is wrong, and if you had really seen other calculations as you said, you would have realized that I redid it (although I have to change the thickness px)
2. You used nimbostratus without explanation despite the fact that these are stratocumulus clouds, with them being nimbostratus being made simply impossible by the fact that when the clouds are cleared you can see cumulus clouds floating above... making it a physical impossibility given the expected thickness of nimbostratus and their average elevation compared to cumulus besides their obvious visual look.
Moments before Saiki dispersed the clouds, it was raining (I'm using manga because I couldn't find a video of the anime). The fact that they look clearer is probably due to animation issues.
The clouds above the storm resemble (at least from what I can see) cirrus clouds more. Wich make since cirrus clouds indicates the arrival of rain.
The reason I proposed a ban from further calcs (at least relating to this verse) is due to your consistent unreliability in interpreting and applying concepts in the calculations over the period of almost 3 years. Regardless of calc's status as re-dos or not. These are quite literally ALL of your calcs pertaining to the verse and absolutely all have at least one significant issue (minus the moon ones which is have rather mild ones).

It takes hours to check calcs if you check them throughly so CGMs often end up overlooking things if you try again and again with a lot just checking arithmetic, I just do not think you can be trusted for calculating things.

I am happy with just nulling your calculations but I would not trust you to be reliable
Calling all calculations bad/incorrect seems harsh to me, but okay.

I'm fine with canceling the calculations and redoing them.

Although if you still want your “reliability” thing, I can ask in the Calculation Requests Thread
 
I'm not gonna engage in a back and forth with you as it is pointless as I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I already got my point across but calling the clouds cirrus is far too much of a reach, you can find one image of 100 that make the cirrus resemble the necessary shape. You are also only thinking about this now because I am questioning you on it.

 
I'm not gonna engage in a back and forth with you as it is pointless as I'm not trying to convince you of anything.
I alredy said that i'm fine with the calcs getting nullified
I already got my point across but calling the clouds cirrus is far too much of a reach, you can find one image of 100 that make the cirrus resemble the necessary shape. You are also only thinking about this now because I am questioning you on it.
No?
 
Back
Top