• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Clarifying Non Combat Versus Threads

Really, drawing on those examples, I do think something like "Who could defeat the most medieval soldiers?" would be ideal. Since that's abstracted, and military-adjacent enough, to hopefully not cause too many bad feelings.
 
Really, drawing on those examples, I do think something like "Who could defeat the most medieval soldiers?" would be ideal. Since that's abstracted, and military-adjacent enough, to hopefully not cause too many bad feelings.
That one does sound way better, but doesn't it still run afoul of not allowing other participants?
 
That one does sound way better, but doesn't it still run afoul of not allowing other participants?
I think it's fine to consider "medieval soldiers" to be a class of non-fictional participant.
 
I think that FinePoint's suggested wording is good, but Agnaa's newest suggestion is also an improvement in my view. 🙏
 
Back
Top